How about we rename "The Soap Box" to "salisburyboy's Hate Rant Forum" ? Seriously, do we need all of these "I hate Democrats", "I hate Arabs/Muslims", "I hate Catholics", "I hate Atheists", "I hate evolutionists", and etc threads?

And why on Earth can we not keep one thread for each of his hate rants? On 4/5, he created a thread called "The Democratic Party - America's Socialist Party ". The same day, he created another beauty called "today's Democrats-fascism and power at any cost". And again, you guessed it, the same day he created a wonder named "Democratic Party - a pawn of Satan". Why do we need all of this in one area? That is blatently against the rules.

Of course, he has the right to make threads on whatever he wants. Every website needs an evil Ned Flanders to destort all details and to claim he is holier than thou. . . but can we try to keep it under one roof?


Oh, and for those of you who are already ready to flame me, I will save you the trouble:

"Cry me a river."
"Stop your bitchin."
"Would you like a little cheese with your whine?"
"stfu"
"Go and eat some pie."

I think I will .

4/6/2003 4:22:28 PM

Go and eat some pie

4/6/2003 4:41:31 PM

i like pie

4/6/2003 4:41:51 PM

I do try to eliminate threads if there are multiple threads on the same topic, but it's hard to catch them all.

Also, unless the threads are blatantly against the posting guidelines (like personal attacks on a user, or the thread obviously belongs in another section) then it's difficult to decide what to eliminate because I don't want to cross the line into censoring what people are posting.

[Edited on April 6, 2003 at 7:19 PM. Reason : .]

4/6/2003 7:19:02 PM

SalisburyBox

4/6/2003 11:55:33 PM

^agreed. Your name is better.

4/7/2003 12:49:14 AM

Ah, cool. Someone knows how to spell "atheist" correctly. Thank you.

4/7/2003 10:44:54 AM

I agree with the thread topic.

You people won't hesitate to block me from posting threads, etc., but you have no urge to moderate users like salisbury and steve, whose information is unknowledgeable, ignorant and uninformed 99 percent of the time.

And I know for a fact that other users state how blatently unmoderated shit like this won't suffice on other messageboards...

[Edited on April 7, 2003 at 2:43 PM. Reason : moderation does not equal censorship]

4/7/2003 2:42:40 PM

Quote :

"but you have no urge to moderate users like salisbury and steve, whose information is unknowledgeable, ignorant and uninformed 99 percent of the time. "

THe other end of the spectrum has the same problems in SoapBox, it ain't just them 2.

4/7/2003 3:01:54 PM

The other end?

I don't understand.

There is no "other" end.

These are two morons.

4/7/2003 3:08:17 PM