[user] [/user] get's annoying to have to type out

2/8/2003 10:26:08 PM

agreed. and also, just because, i really want a [no] tag enabled that could call up the no guy... it'd prolly be overused, but still

2/8/2003 10:37:11 PM

I want them to fix the tag buttons that exist. I posted this somewhere else, but I am sick of when I push the button, the curser goes to the begining of the post. I also want the tag to go where ever the curser is and not automatically at the end.

That is all.

2/8/2003 10:58:43 PM

bttttttttt

2/10/2003 1:17:44 PM

[]yes[/]

2/10/2003 1:40:05 PM

I thought about posting a thread like this, but I kinda reasoned it out and user names are usually one word whereas the text you would bold, underline or italacize would be much longer. It'd be neat to have, but I don't know how convenient it would be and whether it would be worth the trouble it would take them to incorporate it.

2/10/2003 3:12:11 PM

Well, it's mostly just one word that's underlined when it's use, and I for one would be willing to sacrifice strikethrough, since it's in a dead heat with for least used button.

2/10/2003 7:34:48 PM

Yes please some user tags.

2/10/2003 8:20:18 PM

Quote :

"I want them to fix the tag buttons that exist. I posted this somewhere else, but I am sick of when I push the button, the curser goes to the begining of the post. I also want the tag to go where ever the curser is and not automatically at the end. That is all."

I believe CrazyJ mentioned this once before, but it would be too hard to implement the code (if it could be done without a plugin or something) to do it. Just don't worry about it.

(See, I used the user tag and it didn't hurt me!)

2/10/2003 8:20:34 PM

s and are both used more than u

2/10/2003 10:54:58 PM

I've never used till right now... I'd rather have teh underlined words... user tags would definately be teh wins though

2/10/2003 11:49:16 PM

please?

2/12/2003 2:59:05 AM