Bolton is in
3/23/2018 12:48:28 AM
Bolton has a weird relationship with Russia, recently was featured in one of their videos.Russia is marginally aligned with Iran (anyone have the details on this?)Bolton hates Iran, and is drooling to go to war with themBolton likely would support a preemptive strike on NKBolton would also likely not oppose the use of nuclear weapons-- at which point all hell would break loose if other countries didn't keep their cool.I'm wondering if this is Trump's way of signaling that if he goes down, he'll take everyone with him??Trump surely knows about Bolton's ideas, couldn't get his staff to agree to Bolton last year, but seems to be in YOLO mode the past few weeks kicking out anyone with a shred of rationality to surround himself with completely unqualified sycophants.
3/23/2018 12:51:59 AM
So whats new? The leadup to war with Iran has been long in motion. The destabilization of Syria and war in Yemen are to create a buffer against Iran. Some even argue Afghanistan and Iraq were as well. Lets not act like its a Bolton thing. We've always been at war with North Korea. No one is going to come to their defense against an American nuclear attack.
3/23/2018 12:57:12 AM
Neither obama nor Hillary would have been interested in war with Iran. Bolton is a potentially significant development.
3/23/2018 1:01:37 AM
Then why did Obama undermine Assad and facilitate Saudi Arabia's proxy war in Yemen?https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/09/yemen-saudi-arabia-obama-riyadh/501365/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-syria-obama-analysis/syrias-civil-war-to-mar-obama-legacy-idUSKBN14228SI take it this was to weaken Iran's leverage against attack and ability to project force on our allies in the scenario of a war.
3/23/2018 1:05:51 AM
Why did Obama return billions of dollars to them and relax sanctions? It's absurd to suggest he was angling for war.
3/23/2018 1:26:45 AM
3/23/2018 1:29:47 AM
hes only a genius at the game that is our political system. winning elections and running a country are two different things.[Edited on March 23, 2018 at 2:45 AM. Reason : that divorce has nothing to do with anything and is sick to bring up]
3/23/2018 2:40:23 AM
Next week on The Apprentice, DC Edition...It is obvious he's trying different names from the hat until he gets himself surrounded by yes men and women.
3/23/2018 7:23:18 AM
No, he's hiring Fox News people and firing those who've said anything critical about Russia. If it were just random people it would about 10x better than what he's actually doing.
3/23/2018 2:44:26 PM
Thread title is dumb.Should be a Bolton thread.
3/23/2018 2:49:26 PM
There were news reports earlier yesterday that an "unknown" group was bombing bases in Syria, media couldn't get anyone to take creditReports out now that it was Israel doing the bombingseems abnormal Israel would be bombing Iranian-backed bases and no one knows about it?
4/9/2018 2:54:09 AM
so maybe they are the ones doing the chemical attacks then
4/9/2018 3:22:51 AM
Netanyahu ripping a page from Trump’s book and bombing Syria to distract from his various scandals.
4/9/2018 5:50:53 AM
Well and pretty much any other President ever who faced a scandal..
4/9/2018 9:06:51 AM
Russia now condemning Israel for massacreing Palestinian protestors last week, after Israel bombs Syrian bases they are allied withWe have Russia-Iran-Syria ratcheting up with Israel nowAs Trump publicly says he wants a withdrawal, but military leadership says we need to stay.But Trump says he wants to terminate the Iran deal which is coming up for renewal in august again, just before midtermsJohn Bolton officially starts this week and supposedly has already gathered several meetings, we did see trump publicly name Putin in condemning Russia for gas attack too (with a tweet obviously not written by trump).
4/9/2018 12:02:25 PM
Judging from his comments right now there will absolutely be a military response overnight.And I’m sure the dumb media will fawn over him for 24 hours like every time bombs get dropped.
4/9/2018 12:08:32 PM
4/9/2018 4:52:40 PM
To the topNato/Ukraine/Taiwan vs china/russia/iran/North KoreaLets do this
9/30/2024 8:03:36 PM
10/1/2024 3:20:40 PM
If I ever get drafted or volunteer, I'll post updates to TWW for you guys
10/1/2024 3:34:27 PM
welp....
10/1/2024 3:58:27 PM
Kamala puts her statement outhttps://www.threads.net/@kamalahq/post/DAmIodCKZoO/?xmt=AUFiTWdvMFpITXBvQXExUWtnUVFTbmFURUR6b1NMWWMzaDUxWk9xVWVBeTdtI’m just a casual armchair news reader but this was a response to Israel putting troops on the ground in Lebanon. Normally that would be called an invasion. I don’t see how she can say with a straight face that Israel is just defending itself. I feel like this statement will hurt her, because most people can see that Netanyahu created this problem and now America is being dragged into it, and she’s not addressing that aspect of things.
10/1/2024 5:11:30 PM
Consider her opponent.
10/1/2024 5:31:02 PM
^^Can you not even pause that video? Holy shit threads sucks.
10/1/2024 5:34:32 PM
^ you have to click and hold on the timeline
10/1/2024 6:15:28 PM
10/1/2024 6:18:39 PM
10/1/2024 7:22:16 PM
10/1/2024 9:31:06 PM
10/2/2024 10:54:18 AM
I'm not sure if the IDF and their spokespeople are the best source of unbiased info about the situation
10/2/2024 11:15:45 AM
yeah well I listen to white house press conferences when there are important matters related to US security too. take the IDF messaging with a grain of salt, fine, but if at the end of the day the words they say are true, then that's what matters.
10/2/2024 11:35:39 AM
That seems to be missing a few more than salient details of the Israeli situation, but ok...
10/2/2024 11:48:05 AM
yeah I didn't say it maps 1-1. it's an analogy that draws attention to particular forces that are at work in the middle east that Israel has to contend with[Edited on October 2, 2024 at 11:51 AM. Reason : i think we can at least all agree the less religious fanaticism a society has within it, the better]
10/2/2024 11:50:04 AM
I wouldn't dare say that Islamic fundamentalist is in no way a driving force here, but to ignore Israeli aggression and outright ethnic cleansing in the West Bank makes that a hard sell. I'd say that Israelis are far more guilty of that "birthright" explanation than anyone else in the region at this point
10/2/2024 12:15:02 PM
10/2/2024 12:31:58 PM
10/2/2024 1:03:15 PM
as far as "Israeli occupation of the West Bank" goes, we can talk about related UN resolutions, but the reality is it is disputed territory. And if the PLO/PA had ACTUALLY ACCEPTED a permanent peace plan and complied with a cessation of hostilities at any point between 1967 and today, we wouldn't have to still be talking about this. But they didn't, because they don't actually accept the right of Israel to exist. that's on them. not to mention that the West Bank was occupied by Jordan for 2 decades. It should have been properly annexed into (Trans)Jordan back then if the majority Arab population there couldn't stand the thought of being part of a multi-ethnic Israeli democratic state.and as far as the Nakba goes, once again, it was the Arab populations who started the war. It's not like that was the first time in human history (or that decade even) that hundreds of thousands of people of a particular ethnic identity were forced to leave their homes and resettle somewhere else because of war. A terrible shame of course, but don't start none won't be none.
10/2/2024 2:02:23 PM
index forward, middle upward, ring and pinky curled down. thumb off to the side
10/2/2024 2:13:59 PM
There's a lot going on in qntmfred's post, and it's hard to know where to begin. There's the facile comparison between Jewish immigration to Palestine and immigration to the United States, in particular creating a false equivalence between the response to those immigrants. There's not a Guatemalan Irgun equivalent blowing up civilians in California so they can re-establish the Viceroyalty of New Spain, and if the United Nations told us we had no choice but to let California become New Spain, we would quite understandably react with military action.There's also the talk about how Palestine just needs to accept "a permanent peace plan" with "some international borders," when in reality what Palestine would have to do is accept Israeli proposals that would strip them of further territory and leave them without real sovereignty in their own territory. It's the "If you stop fighting back we won't have to fight anymore" argument that Putin fans use for Ukraine.I think I was most angry at "A terrible shame of course, but don't start none won't be none." As though the entire Arab population, man, woman, and child, started the war. As though there wasn't an international consensus and laws of war saying you shouldn't just kick civilian populations out of areas or seize the property of refugees.But really all the dwelling on historical narratives obscures the current reality we actually have to deal with:Israel exists. It is a Jewish state. There is no way to change either of those facts without resorting to genocide and/or ethnic cleansing.Palestinians exist in Gaza and the West Bank. There is no way to change that fact without resorting to genocide and/or ethnic cleansing. Even if neighboring Arab states - who I acknowledge have a long historical record of being shitty on Palestine - even if they welcomed Palestinians with open arms, making them move would be an act of ethnic cleansing.Perhaps this is a normative statement rather than a fact, but I'm going to go ahead and say "Genocide and ethnic cleansing are bad."From those premises - you can't get rid of Israel or Palestinians without genocide and genocide is bad - the only solution involves the creation of a Palestinian state, which Netanyahu's government and a substantial portion of Israelis reject.Which brings us to the nuts and bolts of our current reality, which are the government or pseudo-government actors causing this crisis. These entities are far more important than quotes from long-dead Emirs, and most of them are shitty.The present Israeli government has a few motivations, none of which are really laudable. Clearly it isn't about getting hostages back. There's a revenge element, which I can understand if not condone. There's pretty clearly a drive to expel Palestinians from all or much of Gaza. In order to get political cover to "finish the job," they want Donald Trump to win. Netanyahu has all but said as much. I am increasingly suspicious that recent Israeli escalation is timed and in part designed to create a crisis to hurt Harris' chances, and if open conflict with Iran begins before the election I will be sure of it.There's also an element of Netanyahu's personal need to retain power, which has no doubt driven some of these decisions.Iran gave the green light to 10/7 in order to disrupt Israel's integration into the Saudi-led bloc of its opponents. The goal is understandable for a geopolitical perspective, though obviously the means are inexcusable. Subsequent Iranian actions suggest that, having accomplished their goal, they are averse to further escalation. That's why the first Iranian missile attack was carefully choreographed to fail.Hamas wanted to make the price of maintaining the status quo unacceptably high to Israel, and to galvanize Palestinian opposition to Israel via Israeli overreaction. Mission accomplished, which is why they're willing to go with a ceasefire.Hezbollah's motivations are a little hazier to me and I assume they're mostly acting at Iranian direction.
10/10/2024 8:41:42 AM
10/10/2024 11:25:07 AM
And the conclusion to be drawn from all that is: Israel is really the only actor with the means to stop the current conflict. They're not doing it, because their government is only interested in preserving its power and furthering its expansionist aims.I'm not sure that's something we as the United States can stop; if we cut them off tomorrow, they'd just court Russia or China. But we sure as shit don't have to support it, especially when they're so transparently meddling in our domestic politics.
10/10/2024 2:14:34 PM
10/11/2024 11:36:51 PM