...to just design something way better for just the normal part of his job
1/24/2018 4:58:55 PM
frequent catered meetings don't pay for themselves
1/24/2018 5:18:55 PM
This cost $226k. Which was a bigger waste of money?
1/24/2018 5:25:24 PM
according to math, 250 > 226
1/24/2018 5:30:35 PM
The first is essentially an existing logo that just go repurposed. The Raleigh one isn't great but at least it's new.
1/24/2018 5:31:38 PM
city of, uh... whatever kind of tree this clipart is. nailed it.[Edited on January 24, 2018 at 6:44 PM. Reason : the raleigh logo is much worse than the state logo]
1/24/2018 6:44:13 PM
...to switch to Geico?
1/24/2018 8:19:44 PM
I like the raleigh logo...The unc system logo looks weird without the text but I think the idea that each side represents a school is a good one and I could see the logo growing on me...
1/24/2018 10:31:52 PM
could have just went on fiverr and got the same thing[Edited on January 24, 2018 at 10:37 PM. Reason : ]
1/24/2018 10:36:20 PM
1/24/2018 10:45:26 PM
http://www.newsobserver.com/news/local/education/article196364254.html
1/24/2018 10:56:17 PM
Oh, that's pretty cool. For some reason I was envisioning the right and left sides of the state, not each section of the perimeter of the state.
1/24/2018 10:58:47 PM
We all know which school the long side represents.That logo is wack.
1/24/2018 10:58:57 PM
Yeah, I mean I appreciate the fact that we don't have a well representing 16 of 17 schools that don't give a shit about that but that is just dumb with the 17 sides nonsense
1/24/2018 11:01:29 PM
#sources close to the situation have told me the alternative/second option that they didn't go with for logo re-design was much worse. my source also doesn't like this new logo.
1/25/2018 6:58:25 AM
1/25/2018 8:03:27 AM
yeah the raleigh logo is so real dumb bullshit. shoulda just gone with something like this. it's more accurate and not any less shitty than the current one.
1/25/2018 10:20:57 AM
Isn’t the new raleigh logo a big oak tree leaf though?
1/25/2018 1:34:26 PM
The dollar figures that are being cited...is that just for the design? Or does that also take into account all of the retooling that needs to be done with letterheads, signage, etc? Because if that is the case, then yea, I can certainly see how it would cost that much.
1/25/2018 1:53:01 PM
[Edited on January 25, 2018 at 1:57 PM. Reason : nevermind. misread. ]
1/25/2018 1:56:47 PM
1/25/2018 2:38:27 PM
I think they were going for "City of Oaks meets RTP technology" since the right side leaflets look digital. But the overall product looks like the logo for some pharmaceutical that you'd see a commercial for on TV.
1/25/2018 2:41:07 PM
Ask your doctor if Raleigh is right for you. Side effects may include frequent urination, insatiable appetite, and even death.I actually like the Raleigh logo if it's supposed to be an oak leaf and not an oak tree. Stump ain't brown...my money is on oak leaf.
1/25/2018 3:06:36 PM
Except it looks nothing like an oak leaf
1/25/2018 3:19:39 PM
my flag proposal was second runner up
1/25/2018 3:22:17 PM
1/25/2018 3:30:30 PM
I thought it was supposed to be a tree. And the green shapes all around it are the tree’s leaves. Either way nothing about it screams “oak”. I don’t even dislike the logo itself. There’s just nothing oak about it
1/25/2018 4:10:44 PM
Someone explain this and the UNC-school system. is it the same thing?
1/25/2018 4:33:20 PM
they aren't the same. just two separate things where lots of money was spent to produce a shitty logo.
1/25/2018 4:52:31 PM
That Raleigh Tree looks like a Bradford Pear,they should have put "stink lines" coming off of it and some watery eyes and a runny nose in the background
1/25/2018 5:19:50 PM
good logo for a discrete porn company
1/25/2018 8:27:15 PM
^^also they should have a version where half of it has broken off and fallen down in a slight breeze
1/25/2018 8:33:57 PM