http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/21/world/asia/us-soldiers-told-to-ignore-afghan-allies-abuse-of-boys.htmlHorrible, just horrible
9/25/2015 7:21:27 PM
http://www.reuters.com/article/2007/11/19/us-afghan-dancingboys-idUSISL1848920071119This one has quotes from the pederasts boasting about their lechery and perversion... very revolting
9/25/2015 10:44:29 PM
yeah, i don't care how realpolitik you are, this is morally bankrupt.
9/26/2015 11:15:17 AM
We lost the war on terror because terror actually grew during our war. We fought on the side of terror, fertilized it, and even became it.
9/26/2015 8:44:45 PM
I think there are examples of that. I think that, on balance, the opposite is true. Unfortunately, just as an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure, an ounce of poison is also worth a pound of cure.The bigger problem, though, is not what we promoted and actively did wrong, but what we omitted and/or failed to accomplish: stability.
9/27/2015 1:06:14 PM
In Peace Corps Benin, we're told to ignore sexual molestation, harassment, and assault by male teachers against female students. It's ubiquitous, and happens at every school in this country. It's considered appropriate in the local culture, more or less; more importantly, the last time a PCV tried to report it to Peace Corps, she was murdered by the teacher in question.Obviously we find "ignore it" to be a difficult pill to swallow, and I still don't know whether I think it's a good policy. On the one hand, the problem is much too large for us to handle as a whole; in the meantime, we're defenseless if other teachers would rather slit our throats than stop fucking 14 year old students. On the other hand, it's reprehensible and damages individual lives and the country as a whole.The Marine in question wasn't defenseless, of course, but his Afghan allies are packing, too, and they outnumber him. Meanwhile it's hard enough to find Afghan soldiers who aren't secretly plotting the next green on blue attack without also pissing them off by taking away what may be, in their mind, a fundamental right in their culture.Meanwhile the alternative is the Taliban, who may or may not be anti-raping-little-boys but are pro-numerous-other-horrible-things. The problem in both cases is a culture that is unacceptable in its current form. I don't subscribe to the modern idea that cultures can be inferior or superior. At least in some key respects, a culture that condones raping young people is inferior. A few hundred years ago we would have met this problem by eradicating the culture in question, but I do subscribe to the modern idea that genocide is bad. Which leaves us with the bigger problem of "How do you change a culture?" Which requires a more detailed response than, "Raping boys is sick."
9/28/2015 6:49:28 AM
9/28/2015 12:52:26 PM
education changes culture. period. no culture advocates harming children, they just don't know what they are doing is causing permanent harm. We put our boys into youth football which is just as if not more damaging. Its simply because most people don't know that letting little boys bang their heads together is causing permanent harm.
9/28/2015 1:20:09 PM
^ Education falls under "positive engagement"but I o.O at:"We put our boys into youth football which is just as if not more damaging"
9/28/2015 3:10:24 PM
See? Americans are shocked by that statement in the same way Afghanis would probably be shocked to hear about how sexual abuse causes long lasting damage to children. Its all a matter of education just at different levels. The level of education that determines their cultural practices is low, but our high level of culture-determining education could still improve. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/sports/concussion-watch/76-of-79-deceased-nfl-players-found-to-have-brain-disease/http://www.bu.edu/cte/about/what-is-cte/http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/abs/10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.07111774
9/28/2015 4:22:17 PM
I don't think anyone is shocked to hear someone say playing football can cause damage. Claiming that it is "just as if not more damaging" is the problem here.Are you saying that if you took 1000 boys and had them play football for a few years and a 1000 other boys and raped them for a few years that a higher percentage of the boys playing football would have longer lasting ill-effects?Because if that's what you're saying, you're going to have to provide a lot more proof than just evidence that football is bad.But that's of course not the point of this thread, so really football shouldn't be discussed here in the first place
9/28/2015 4:53:31 PM
That's also the highest level, so playing for an additional 5-10 years with only the strongest and fastest colliding. So you've got to rape the kids as hard as possible well into their late 20s and maybe 30s[Edited on September 28, 2015 at 6:10 PM. Reason : Rule #1]
9/28/2015 6:09:54 PM
on the plus side sounds like they whooped the hell out of the perp
9/28/2015 9:02:42 PM
9/29/2015 11:15:33 PM
Youre just proving my point though. The idea that your culture is superior is so deeply entrenched that you are unable to even entertain the idea that something that damaging to kids could be so widely acceptef here. In 50 years when football as we know it has been abolished people will look back on it as savagery. Concussions arent just something that can happen in football they are part of the game.
9/30/2015 12:31:20 AM
You made a point that playing football as a child is as damaging or worse than than being raped.You did NOT originally make the simple point that Americans aren't as sensitive to football injuries. You are trying to make that point now because you've realized your first point is indefensible and most likely incorrect
9/30/2015 10:54:37 AM
9/30/2015 1:56:52 PM
9/30/2015 7:22:50 PM