some clerk is refusing to issue the marriage licenses here in marion, fox carolina is here to cover the storyreligious zealots at work already squawking about it. I think im gonna leave early today
9/10/2015 2:45:52 PM
and a double post wtf
9/10/2015 2:46:51 PM
the separation of church and state is a fundamental ideal of our government**Excluding faggotry-Ben Franklin ]
9/10/2015 2:51:08 PM
But we got this: http://www.wral.com/nc-gay-marriage-opt-out-written-to-avoid-kentucky-style-impasse/14874577/*grabs popcorn*
9/10/2015 4:04:13 PM
Here's the only article I could find on it. http://www.citizen-times.com/story/news/local/2015/09/10/mcdowell-magistrates-refuse-perform-marriages/72018392/Its not just a clerk, its all four McDowell County magistrates. Also, because the NC Opt Out Law is in effect, they can't issue licenses to anyone, gay or straight, for 6 months.Magistrates from Rutherford county are having to come in to fill in the gaps.I can't wait for this firestorm to get going. Right now it seems the slackjaws are mainly focused on gay marriage, but if their twisted logic takes root I wouldn't be surprised to see more government employees refusing to do their jobs because of religious beliefs.
9/10/2015 4:28:45 PM
If your religion prevents you from doing the job you signed up to do, then don't job.
9/10/2015 4:58:28 PM
9/10/2015 5:15:34 PM
This whole fucking thing is so retarded and it give me such a headache.I knew this was going to happen. as soon as the bitch in Ky started to get attention i thought to myself "Yeah I could that going down here" and sure enough, a few days later here we are. I knew my backwards ass county wouldn't let me down
9/10/2015 5:18:15 PM
9/10/2015 5:32:01 PM
^I think that's what kills me about the whole thing. The fact that you can't suddenly just allow people to pick and choose what laws they want to obey based on what religion they happen to claim be, seems like such a simple and obvious conclusion. Yet for some people it may as well be light years away.
9/10/2015 5:52:49 PM
^^,^^^^Very few job descriptions mention the requirement of heterosexuality, or the disqualification due to homosexuality. In Kim Davis' case, hers was to issue marriage licenses to those applicants meeting the legal requirements to receive said license. It was never her job to judge, condone, approve, or do otherwise; it was simply to check boxes and give people a piece of paper.
9/11/2015 8:52:28 AM
her beef is with her name being on that piece of paper. just remove the name and allow a stamp for the office title and this problem should go away.
9/11/2015 9:22:59 AM
I feel 0 feels for her. Her role is nothing but an administrative bureaucrat to check boxes on a piece of paper to ensure legal requirements are met. Her signature is provided only to validate that the certificate is legal. Her religion has nothing to do with it, except that she wants to force her beliefs on others. And the last article I read, she wanted more than her name removed - she didn't want the county clerk or clerk's office referenced on certificates at all. Fuck this woman.
9/11/2015 9:27:28 AM
9/11/2015 9:34:57 AM
I don't care if them niggers go to school, just not my kid's schoolI don't care if we help them raghead refugees, just not in my state or with my moneyAMIRITE?[Edited on September 11, 2015 at 9:38 AM. Reason : .]
9/11/2015 9:37:05 AM
9/11/2015 1:44:09 PM
^What law changed?The Kentucky and US Constitutions say the same thing today as they did six months ago.
9/11/2015 2:42:44 PM
Legal interpretation of the law was adjudicated. And that interpretation is enforceable.
9/11/2015 2:46:52 PM
Interpretation is enforceable if the enforcer enforces it. The Supreme Court does not have carte blanche to interpret however it wishes, on anything it wishes, with universal jurisdiction and with no recourse for other branches, lower courts, or states.[Edited on September 11, 2015 at 2:53 PM. Reason : a]
9/11/2015 2:51:57 PM
9/11/2015 3:39:41 PM
No, the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Kentucky still states:"Only a marriage between one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in Kentucky. A legal status identical or substantially similar to that of marriage for unmarried individuals shall not be valid or recognized."The Supreme Court went outside their jurisdiction, and then ruled completely contrary to the clear intent of the laws under question. Some say the law needed to be changed. Fine, then the law should be changed...by a legislature, not a court with invented meanings with complete disregard for jurisdiction or judicial prudence of any kind. That's exactly the kind of thing that states and elected officials exist to prevent.If you want same-sex marriage bans to be unconstitutional, then put on big-boy pants and amend the US Constitution to your liking. You don't get to just wave a magic interpretive wand to get your desired result.[Edited on September 11, 2015 at 4:00 PM. Reason : a]
9/11/2015 3:58:45 PM
Anyone else find the irony that by cites "religious freedom" as an excuse for denying a homosexual couple with the freedom to marry Obviously by signing this marriage certificate, Kim Davis will be forced to enter a lesbian marital arrangement. Perhaps though this will work out then her previous 3 marriages; i'm so glad she is out there to defend the sanctity of marriage. I wonder how Jesus feels about her bastard babies?
9/11/2015 4:11:42 PM
I'm sorry the school system failed you so poorly. You're understanding of the 3 branches of government is troubling.The supreme court struck down the same-sex marriages bans because it denied citizens rights guaranteed to them under the constitution with the fourteenth ammendment.The Governor of Kentucky immediately announced that they would comply and order magistrates and clerks to issue licenses to same-sex couples.The supreme court exists specifically for these cases. Its easy enough to pass laws that discriminate and exploit minority groups and its another thing entirely to get them removed.9 judges, hand picked by past presidents and approved by past congresses voted to overturn an unconstitutional law. Davis, an elected government official, doesn't get to decide which laws she's comfortable enforcing despite Federal AND State officials telling her otherwise.
9/11/2015 4:17:59 PM
Using the 14th amendment in this case is a blatant abuse of language, intent, context, and anything else that ought to inform jurisprudence. It is clear judicial over-reach, and a ruling formed exclusively by the social policy of the justices and is not in any way based on fact or law. The Supreme Court may err on fact or law, but they tossed those completely out the window, along with the dictionary and any notion of boundaries.So, same-sex marriage bans are wrong. That's great. Pass a law banning them. Pass the ultimate law banning them in the Constitution. Do something with a legislature, because you are looking to change the law.The Supreme Court did not even attempt to interpret the 14th amendment. The 14th amendment was a convenient excuse. It amended the Constitution, and it doesn't have the authority to do that.
9/11/2015 4:40:06 PM
Then there is the issue of judges ruling on same-sex marriage bans after performing same-sex marriages themselves. Yeah, no need to recuse on that one...
9/11/2015 4:51:32 PM
K, I get it now....you're just trolling. No one can be this obtuse unless its deliberate.
9/11/2015 4:53:26 PM
9/24/2015 12:33:32 PM
http://roygbiv.jezebel.com/kim-daviss-lone-gay-friend-were-not-actually-friends-1732999815
9/25/2015 3:26:15 PM
9/25/2015 4:39:27 PM
Haha yup pretty much I actually looked at this one when I pasted it and was like...well shit this one isn't a gawker link...guess i only read the first part of that URL I <3 Gawker media.
9/25/2015 5:11:59 PM