http://www.topgear.com/uk/photos/20yearsofcars-mag-promo?module=best&utm_expid=12261766-9.n3UKns_sT6uGHKlagvv2qg.1#34 represent!...but rather weird list
9/16/2013 2:17:11 AM
# 1 2005 Bugatti VeyronDamn car is already 8 years old, about to be 9. My how time has flown!
9/16/2013 3:09:25 AM
No M3, but prius is #11
9/16/2013 3:56:12 AM
9/16/2013 5:45:59 AM
Itt magazine racers will brag/complain about their purchases and this list.
9/16/2013 6:11:29 AM
Lol yep
9/16/2013 9:12:26 AM
#37 & 21 [Edited on September 16, 2013 at 10:14 AM. Reason : k]
9/16/2013 10:11:37 AM
woot! #34 and #16
9/16/2013 11:25:44 AM
Lol I have 0 cars on this list. Mainly because 100% of my cars were never sold there but... You know that's just. A small reason the Rest is they are all rough around the edges to say the least.Why kill someone with a scalpel when you can beat them with a hammer ?[Edited on September 16, 2013 at 12:29 PM. Reason : Lol I thought they might have a soul... I guess not.]
9/16/2013 12:25:55 PM
Surprised the land rovers made it there considering they only hold value for 5 or so years
9/16/2013 1:00:09 PM
What a weird list.I can't afford a Veyron, so I'll have to go with the #2 best car of the last 20 years; the 2005 VW GTI.
9/16/2013 1:03:49 PM
Seems like they were selected by readers/subscribers... that would explain some of the weird choices, but still doesn't explain the Fiat Multipla I remember going crazy over the Lancia Delta Integrale as a child... I still love that car.Surprised the 911 they chose is from 93... Was that really the best 911? And the Boxster from 96. What about newer Porsches aside from the Carrera GT?List also needs Land Cruiser and Lexus LS400. Aside from the Prius and Hilux, the few Japanese cars that did make the cut are all small sports cars. What about NSX, Supra, 300ZX, RX-7, 3000GT?MB G-class also deserves a place, IMO.McLaren F1???[Edited on September 16, 2013 at 1:35 PM. Reason : ]
9/16/2013 1:34:40 PM
I'm not sure those cars are numerically ranked. Could just be a "list".
9/16/2013 2:09:09 PM
#45 says 1999 BMW X5 but shows a pic of a 2009 BMW X5
9/16/2013 2:15:13 PM
The photo of the Boxster is wrong as well. A 986 is listed, but a 981 is shown
9/16/2013 2:30:12 PM
9/16/2013 2:30:20 PM
INTEGRA!
9/16/2013 2:32:28 PM
#22
9/16/2013 3:44:26 PM