out 11/22/13latest EW issue has new pictures from the set, check some out here!http://www.ew.com/ew/package/0,,20419951,00.htmltalk amongst yourselves[Edited on January 15, 2013 at 10:57 AM. Reason : link]
1/15/2013 10:57:01 AM
iop1
1/15/2013 12:27:36 PM
Dang I must be the only one who cares. Ah well
1/15/2013 1:32:43 PM
...?
1/15/2013 2:23:02 PM
^^no, there just isn't that much to talk about at this point
1/15/2013 2:30:13 PM
Hopefully this movie continues the precedent set by the first one of watering down the core themes of the book to make sure it doesn't provoke any thoughts or offend anyone.
1/16/2013 9:59:27 AM
There has been plenty of talk about this one in the thread for the first movie.
1/16/2013 12:41:27 PM
well i made you a new one
1/16/2013 12:50:06 PM
I wasn't complaining, just pointing out that people do care
1/16/2013 1:05:47 PM
i am so excited! the second book was my favorite of the 3 so i am interested in seeing how it comes out as a movie.
1/16/2013 1:26:02 PM
Once a trailer is out I'll get more excited. Then I'll also begin to get excited for casting for the third movie. Which I guess I need a refresher on new characters in 3 vs 2.
1/16/2013 1:26:59 PM
1/16/2013 1:33:17 PM
1/18/2013 10:20:04 PM
I read them all back to back so I guess that's why I don't really have a favorite. But am really looking forward to seeing how the clock thing turns out.
1/18/2013 10:44:50 PM
The movie will be a disappointment
1/18/2013 10:49:14 PM
Not expecting much, honestly.[Edited on January 18, 2013 at 11:52 PM. Reason : f]
1/18/2013 11:52:21 PM
OMFG SPOILERS JESUS
1/19/2013 2:59:41 PM
new trailer out http://movies.yahoo.com/video/hunger-games-catching-fire-trailer-211105191.html, looks good to me[Edited on July 21, 2013 at 12:02 PM. Reason : $$$]
7/21/2013 11:56:42 AM
Thad Castle making an appearance.
7/21/2013 6:46:30 PM
Not technically about Catching Fire, but some of y'all might be interested:http://www.eonline.com/news/452591/mockingjay-casting-stef-dawson-joins-hunger-games-franchise-as-annie-cresta
10/7/2013 5:42:39 PM
New trailerhttp://insidemovies.ew.com/2013/10/27/final-catching-fire-trailer-world-series-game-4/
11/3/2013 8:12:12 PM
That's the first trailer I've seen that actually made part 2 distinguishable from part 1.
11/4/2013 12:04:53 PM
It was really fucking good
11/23/2013 3:40:47 PM
i know no one that will go see this with mewho wants to sit through it with me? I promise not to talk like I usually do[Edited on November 23, 2013 at 3:43 PM. Reason : ]
11/23/2013 3:42:10 PM
I really liked it, but I wish they had spent more time on showing what happened in the arena.
11/23/2013 7:39:44 PM
If they can create living monsters out of nothing, than why not just create cattle, chicken, turkeys etc for agriculture and food. Those god damn monsters in the first one were so fucking retarded. It killed the movie for me.See what happens when you let a woman write a story about a dystopian future, oppressive government, and future military technology.
11/23/2013 8:14:37 PM
Better than the 1st? Like TDK wich is better than batman begins
11/23/2013 8:25:38 PM
^^ in the book they did not come from nothing^ I liked the first one, and I thought this one was even better[Edited on November 23, 2013 at 8:38 PM. Reason : $$$]
11/23/2013 8:37:59 PM
11/24/2013 1:58:11 AM
I really wish it stood on its own more. I haven't read the books. So as someone just walking in and not knowing to expect it to just end without any conclusion, it was a major detractor as far as me saying that this movie itself is "good". It was a good part of something bigger. But it didn't even feel like a great cliff hanger. It felt more like a place I'd decide to put a book down for the night to go to bed, expecting to pick it right back up tomorrow (not a year from now). Not a situation where I can't wait for the next part. But just "well, this is a good break in everything". I.E. I'm not clamoring to see what's left due to anticipation or desire to know what happens next. I want to see the rest simply because I feel like i'm only about 1/2 - 2/3 through this movie.For what there is of it, I did generally like it as much as the first, and it may have even been better. But it just doesn't stand on its own as a movie. Perhaps that doesn't/won't bother others as much as me.I've since learned that the book itself pretty much just stops. I'd be just as bothered by that. It's bad/cheap writing imo unless the second part is going to be released very shortly thereafter.
11/24/2013 2:09:28 AM
^I thought it was pretty common knowledge that this was part of a trilogy. I read the first two but haven't read Mockingjay so it follows the books. Part one was about developing the love triangle and Katniss' fame in the districts. Part two told much more about the individual districts and them starting to rally, and how the Capital will stop at nothing to hold power. Book three, I assume, will be about the rebellion itself. The end of the movie makes sense because Peeta is being held at the Capital and they're on a hovercraft to district 14, which was assumed until now to be destroyed, to raise an army.
11/24/2013 3:45:36 AM
^^ that post makes absolutely no sense.
11/24/2013 10:14:02 AM
Catching Fire was better than Hunger Games IMO.Also LOL at the new cat. Well played for the book fans.
11/24/2013 8:27:11 PM
The Hunger Games (movie) was poorly directed and filmed, and I don't think I could stand watching it again. I mean, my whole group of friends came away feeling Peeta was some master deceiver who played Katniss the entire time and was planning on not eating the berries and tricking her into it. It really felt like a "young adult" watered down version of Battle Royale.Catching Fire felt like a much better movie. It actually dealt with social aspects of the games and felt like the plot was purposefully leading somewhere. The random traps and environmental hazards also felt legitimately interesting, especially since they were timed and predictable and thus exploitable. The first movie hazards . . . just dumb and ridiculous and at the whims of the masters. I enjoyed this movie.[Edited on November 25, 2013 at 12:14 AM. Reason : ]
11/25/2013 12:11:47 AM
11/25/2013 1:39:16 AM
[Edited on November 25, 2013 at 3:06 AM. Reason : d]
11/25/2013 2:42:22 AM
saw it last night. thought it was ok. will never watch again.
11/25/2013 7:04:13 AM
^^^i can sort of understand that sentiment, especially if you haven't read the books. It does stop rather abruptly (although the ending was exactly the same as the 2nd book), but I would argue that it does tell a full story. This one is all about 2 things, the seeds of a revolution and the quarter quell, and by the end we see both of those followed all the way through. She survives the quarter quell, through a giant act of defiance (shown to everyone in Panem) with contributions from members of multiple districts, and even the capital, and this pushes things over the edge to full blown revolution, and whether she likes it or not, katniss is the symbol of that revolution. It wouldn't make much sense to get into the next part of the story in this one[Edited on November 25, 2013 at 8:05 AM. Reason : $$$]
11/25/2013 8:04:41 AM
It read like you were drunk, and you contradict yourself a couple times, but I was employing some hyperbole there.
11/25/2013 9:38:16 AM
Jennifer is damn hot like catching fire.
11/25/2013 9:43:59 AM
I just saw the movie and really likes it. I read the books and liked the first one ok but I wasn't blown away, thought this one was much better. The casting in both has been superb.
11/25/2013 6:56:28 PM
Saw it last night and enjoyed it. I didn't feel like there needed to be more time in the arena. Also agree that the casting was done well. Love me some Phillip Seymour Hoffman. Sounds bad...but whenever he shows up in a movie, I'm like..."oh, this movie is legit now."What's the time table for the third movie?
11/26/2013 9:41:50 AM
11/26/2013 9:58:48 AM
11/26/2013 10:05:06 AM
when it comes to the time in the arena, the pacing and how much was shown was, i thought, just the right amount. not to do this, but even in the book there isn't much time spent in the arena. that is mostly because of the events as we saw in the movie with the physical destruction of the arena.PSH is awesome; i totally forgot he was in this until i saw him which was a really nice surprise.Part 1 of Mockingjay is Nov '14 and Part 2 will be Nov '15and regarding Peeta and the whole love thing. this is a game, albeit a nasty one with death, but a game nonetheless. you play to win and exercise any strategies possible. Peeta was smart enough to know to appeal to the audience and therefore sponsors, which are the difference between life and death. and Haymitch was spot on after Katniss flipped at Peeta for declaring he had a crush on her. whether real or fake, the intention was to make her likable and appealing and that's what Peeta did.[Edited on November 26, 2013 at 10:30 AM. Reason : .]
11/26/2013 10:26:52 AM
^ fair enough
11/26/2013 10:34:17 AM
Am I the only one who thinks that J-Law and Josh Hutcherson have horrible on-screen chemistry??
11/26/2013 10:51:41 AM
Eh...its kind of the point for the majority of the movie. He's in love with her, but knows she doesn't feel the same way...then flip that on her side. It's suppose to be "awkward".
11/26/2013 10:56:50 AM
Yeah I get that. I know their "love" isn't genuine so there's supposed to be a degree of awkwardness...but I have a hard time believing the situation in general. Maybe it's because Josh Hutcherson comes off as really young to me...I still picture him as the kid in Little Manhattan.
11/26/2013 11:01:45 AM
the awkwardness works for meso i'm ok with it
11/26/2013 12:59:32 PM