Very odd circumstances surrounding the abrupt departure of Vikram Pandit today. Just a day after Citi reported one of its best quarters in years the CEO is out. He maintains that it was his choice to leave, word on the street is mixed.What say you, Soapbox? Is Pandit's departure good for Citi? Could it result in Citi pulling back from its previous goal of being the bank of the BRIC and move back to a more focused domestic business model? How does this potentially impact Citi's 260k employees?
10/16/2012 2:18:18 PM
Citi lost 88% of it's value and this bastard is walking away with $260 million. If only we followed Iceland's lead.
10/16/2012 4:54:51 PM
I don't think Citi's failures had a lot to do with Pandit. Had more to do with his predecessors who got the ball rolling. I think he did have some issues with the board, ultimately because of the stock price. I think all boards around the US focus too much on the stock price, specifically in the near-term. I listen to the politics of the importance of private business over government jobs and I think they're right when they're talking about truly private businesses. Publicly traded companies..? Ehhhhh..
10/16/2012 10:44:20 PM
crash verrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrry imminent
10/17/2012 2:36:03 AM
10/19/2012 10:52:13 AM
10/19/2012 11:05:14 AM
^ yes.
10/19/2012 9:01:17 PM
10/20/2012 4:34:57 AM
10/21/2012 6:31:40 PM
10/27/2012 1:43:29 AM
^^ I'm flattered (I think). One of our education systems greatest failings is our lack of focus on financial education.
10/27/2012 2:36:38 PM
10/27/2012 4:11:29 PM
its all a conspiracy, they are doing it on purpose!
10/27/2012 5:02:28 PM