http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/obama-warns-u-must-iran-152753460--election.html....after Moumoud says on national TV that he has no clue what he is going to do with 1 nuclear weapon against the United States has 5600 trained on him. He is not even attempting to build a nuclear weapon.http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7422940nAhmadinejad: “You see, we did shut down all of the nuclear installations once. But not only the wishes and limitations [of the U.S.] did not decrease, but they were multiplied. Despite all of this we’re still holding a dialogue and we have set forth all of this very sound proposals to the 5 plus 1…..”http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/post/an-interview-with-irans-president-mahmoud-ahmadinejad/2012/09/23/2a645816-05d3-11e2-afff-d6c7f20a83bf_blog.htmlWhen will you believe me that the United States is running on a script that is going to lead up to war regardless of the truth?
9/25/2012 2:30:47 PM
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/09/20/1992-breaking-news-netanyahu-says-iran-close-to-nuclear-weapon/ 1992: Israeli member of parliament Binyamin Netanyahu predicts that Iran was “3 to 5 years” from having a nuclear weapon. 1992: Israeli Foreign Minister Shimon Peres predicts an Iranian nuclear warhead by 1999 to French TV. 1995: The New York Times quotes US and Israeli officials saying that Iran would have the bomb by 2000. 1998: Donald Rumsfeld tells Congress that Iran could have an intercontinental ballistic missile that could hit the US by 2003.
9/25/2012 2:35:22 PM
How long do we have to not be at war with Iran for this to be a failed prediction?
9/25/2012 2:36:47 PM
However long it takes for Ron Paul to become President!
9/25/2012 3:09:45 PM
http://edition.cnn.com/2012/09/24/world/meast/iran-ahmadinejad-interview/index.htmlClarification of the oft repeated "Israel must be wiped from the earth" line by U.S. war propagandists:
9/25/2012 3:10:22 PM
9/25/2012 3:25:27 PM
9/25/2012 3:37:04 PM
It seems to me they'd be pretty dumb TO build a bomb, seeing as how they've signed the NPT and they stand to lose a lot if we get actionable intelligence to suggest they actually are creating nuclear weapons instead of peaceful nuclear technology. They only need to look next door to see what happened to a guy who wasn't actually doing it but the world thought/was duped into thinking that he was.Of course, that's assuming they are rational actors, and not a doomsday cult that thinks a mushroom cloud over Jerusalem is some fulfillment of prophesy.I'm just wondering why anyone thinks his "clarification" of the "wiped off the world" comment is better. They openly want to eradicate Israel, who is currently for better or worse one of our allies. I don't care for Israel, how it was created, or our current political relationship with them, but his comments are still pretty clear.[Edited on September 25, 2012 at 3:43 PM. Reason : .]
9/25/2012 3:37:20 PM
9/25/2012 3:38:45 PM
No, he's a politician, so he's scum like the rest.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahmoud_Ahmadinejad_and_Israel#Translation_controversyRead. Let the knowledge sink in. Yeah, I know you all get your jollies from shouting down the libertarians, but fucking learn something for god damn once.
9/25/2012 3:44:16 PM
I've seen this before, yes, perhaps he was misinterpreted.M point is why do you trust what his words anymore than the us propaganda?
9/25/2012 3:47:52 PM
I don't trust his words. I think he would have to be incredibly stupid to initiate war against any country, especially the U.S. or Israel, but I don't think he is necessarily being any more truthful than other politicians.My point is that the U.S. media distorts his words. It's an easy thing to do since he doesn't speak English and most Americans are too lazy to do anything remotely resembling research, even though "research" takes 15 seconds of googling.
9/25/2012 3:49:50 PM
How is "must vanish from the page of time" or "must be eliminated from the pages of history" any different than "be wiped from the Earth?"They seem like idiomatic approximates to me. <shrug>
9/25/2012 3:52:24 PM
and his discussion about the anti-islam film doesn't make him look any better.
9/25/2012 3:53:15 PM
^^Why are you omitting a critical part of the sentence? What should be wiped from the earth? Jews? Israel?No, he was saying that the regime (that is, the individuals currently running the government of Israel) should be removed from power. It's not much different than saying Obama/Romney should not be President.[Edited on September 25, 2012 at 3:58 PM. Reason : ]
9/25/2012 3:55:56 PM
^^^ exactly.I've red tons of articles about the "mistranslation" but the gist was that Ahmedinjad would have been happy with Israel not existing. It's not too different than our president putting them in the Axis of Evil, or the countless other people in our country that have said we should nuke Iran, but there's no rationalizing that Ahmedinijad's sentiment wasn't much different than saying they wanted to destroy Israel.[Edited on September 25, 2012 at 3:57 PM. Reason : ][Edited on September 25, 2012 at 3:57 PM. Reason : ]
9/25/2012 3:57:35 PM
I mean, that's not what this thread is really about, but colloquially speaking when someone says "Amadinnerjacket said he wants to wipe Israel off the face of the Earth", are they really insinuating that he wants to kill every jew on the planet? We all know he thinks Israel is an occupying regime (not saying I totally disagree with him there) and that's what he's referring to. That's my point. I don't think his clarification changed anything, but maybe I'm listening to different people talking about it.And functionally speaking the dissolution of the Israeli government would quickly be the destruction of the Jewish people in Israel so it isn't really isn't that different.[Edited on September 25, 2012 at 4:04 PM. Reason : .]
9/25/2012 3:59:00 PM
I'll take Ahmadinejad seriously once he starts doing something about victims of rape and domestic violence getting stoned and thrown in jail.
9/25/2012 4:24:49 PM
I don't see how Ahmedinjad's rhetoric is any worse than Netanyahu's bellicose rhetoric about acting unilaterally to prevent Iran from attaining nuclear weapons. It's a ridiculous double standard that the US and Israel put on the rest of the world. We have people who are high ranking US officials saying they want to "bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb bomb Iran" and people running for the presidency who say they would support Israel unconditionally. Apparently we're allowed to flex nuts, but our adversaries are not. Stupid.MEK has been de-listed from the US terrorist list, by the way:http://www.aljazeera.com/news/americas/2012/09/201292285758789844.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/sep/23/iran-usa
9/25/2012 4:27:53 PM
Look, they signed the NPT. They're on board with the "no more nukes for anyone" plan. Surely they should be held to it.Israel, however, can eat a bag of dicks as far as I'm concerned for not signing it.
9/25/2012 4:31:37 PM
the only way Iran will ever convince Israel to eat a bag of dicks would be to get a nuclear weapon.
9/25/2012 4:35:52 PM
9/25/2012 5:59:30 PM
the spain thing is going on right now... live stream http://thegic.org/
9/25/2012 6:01:03 PM
9/25/2012 6:06:24 PM
9/25/2012 6:08:26 PM
9/25/2012 6:28:08 PM
I think what Geniusboy is getting at is that we should exterminate all the Jews before their plan for complete and total world domination is complete.
9/25/2012 6:56:25 PM
He's just a loon. And he derails more threads in TSB than I can count.I listened to 15 minutes of NPR at lunch today and they mentioned the Spanish austerity discussion and potential for protest in Madrid. It's not some censored story like he wants people to believe.For fuck's sake, it was a lead story when I was working on the Bloomberg today.For posterity here is the bloomberg article (updated 6:01PM):http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-09-25/catalan-leader-calls-early-elections-in-challenge-to-rajoy.html[Edited on September 25, 2012 at 9:35 PM. Reason : x]
9/25/2012 9:12:50 PM
9/25/2012 9:34:26 PM
You guys are so fucking narrow minded it makes me physically want to throw up."I don't see shit about it on the news." should not be taken literally. it should be taken relative to the shit you see about a fucking film about islam.Have a nice day dumbshits.
9/25/2012 10:41:29 PM
From the Reuters story
9/25/2012 10:57:01 PM
9/26/2012 12:24:43 AM
The new world order accuses Ahmadinejad of pushing a new world order....The theater of the absurd!! http://news.yahoo.com/ap-interview-ahmadinejad-pushes-world-order-235145610.html[Edited on September 26, 2012 at 1:13 AM. Reason : .]
9/26/2012 1:12:20 AM
Outrageous. He's saying what we all (should) know to be true. Empire building should cease. There should be no one super power that shits on whomever they please. Even so-called "liberals" support this policy of imperialism.
9/26/2012 11:34:01 AM
http://news.yahoo.com/greek-government-faces-first-big-anti-austerity-strike-074143311--business.html[Edited on September 26, 2012 at 12:52 PM. Reason : .]
9/26/2012 12:49:46 PM
Ahmadinejad's full speech transcript:http://gadebate.un.org/sites/default/files/gastatements/67/IR_en.pdfThere's some pretty wise stuff in there. This is the kind of talk that makes him a high priority enemy of the U.S. government. Of course, when the rabid U.S. media gets a hold of it, the only thing that will be mentioned is "The New World Order". There will be no discussion on the meat of the speech - the (correct) assertion that Western powers (primarily, the U.S.) have allowed moral decay and consumerism to take root.
9/26/2012 2:46:50 PM
So is this just the link posting thread?
9/26/2012 2:50:36 PM
Wait, it's the governments job to prevent consumerism and select the morals for the people?
9/26/2012 6:13:34 PM
You aren't dumb enough to believe that I was making that assertion.The fact that morality in the U.S. has declined or disappeared is made clear by the peoples' tolerance for policies that destroy lives. We live in a country where the future of unborn children is sacrificed so we can kill and destroy in other countries for the benefit of a select few. It doesn't get much worse than that.The people not only support these policies, but they celebrate and are proud of them in many cases.
9/26/2012 7:19:43 PM
Americans are no more or less moral than any other people.Anyone who's spent time in another country/culture must surely realize this...The only reason poor countries aren't consumerist are because they're poor. If/when they become more developed, they'll be just as consumerist as we are.If I had to choose between societal decadence, or a muslim/christian theocracy, i'll take the former.Although I can see why the latter is appealing to some.[Edited on September 26, 2012 at 7:33 PM. Reason : ]
9/26/2012 7:32:08 PM
It's a fact our morality has declined? Please support with evidence.
9/26/2012 7:33:50 PM
9/26/2012 7:36:48 PM
9/26/2012 7:43:42 PM
How is it a fact that our morality has decreased? By what metric?
9/26/2012 7:46:32 PM
^I agree. We've been a sociopathic nation since the beginning. Nothing has changed except technology and the groups of people we take advantage of.[Edited on September 26, 2012 at 7:55 PM. Reason : .]
9/26/2012 7:54:55 PM
That's a fair point. I think the point I was trying to convey is that the United States is a thoroughly immoral nation. Whether it was any better in the past is largely immaterial; currently policies reflect a culture that has experienced a severe degree of moral decay.
9/26/2012 8:04:41 PM
I guess the Constitution that was written was secretly a ploy to enslave all people and to start endless wars.
9/26/2012 8:56:40 PM
I can never tell if geniusxboy is being sarcastic or not
9/26/2012 10:03:46 PM
9/26/2012 10:42:48 PM
9/26/2012 10:51:55 PM