http://www.cnn.com/2012/09/15/world/meast/embassy-attacks-main/index.html?hpt=hp_t1

Why the fuck are we letting them tell us what to do, yet they cant wont do as we ask and provide security of their own?

Maybe Im wrong, but I thought most countries viewed embassies as sovereign territory to the occupying country. Which is why wikileaks dude is having fun in England still...

NOTE: Im not trying to make this political. Just logical and rational. Yes there are US political tones in this discussion, but there are also international ones, which is why Im not making this in soapbox.

9/15/2012 11:38:54 PM

Perhaps the linked article has changed, but I don't get the impression that we are letting them tell us what to do at all. It sounds to me like a couple of self interested Yemeni politicians pandering to their uninformed base. They blow up the idea of a marine fast company being sent in to augment security as foreign occupation while neglecting the fact that a marine security guard detachment is posted there 365 days per year.

9/16/2012 5:31:36 AM

How do embassy's and wiki leaks guy have anything in common?

Who's embassy is he at ?

9/16/2012 6:02:21 AM

Wiki leaks guy holed up in the Ecuador embassy in England. England courts ruled hes viable for extradition for crimes. English police wont remove him from the embassy.

9/16/2012 11:17:23 AM

^^embassies, whose

9/16/2012 11:27:06 AM