I think so(minus the wheels)
11/10/2011 5:27:59 PM
11/10/2011 5:34:56 PM
11/10/2011 5:39:17 PM
11/10/2011 6:24:24 PM
11/10/2011 6:37:23 PM
11/10/2011 6:38:23 PM
11/10/2011 6:55:10 PM
Agreethat 458 italia would be at least on the short list, if not #1
11/10/2011 7:22:08 PM
11/10/2011 7:40:30 PM
11/10/2011 8:11:34 PM
At various points in my life:
11/10/2011 8:23:04 PM
11/10/2011 8:38:25 PM
I came here to post the FD, so I'll give another fine example.also, I was in love with the diablo for a long time.
11/10/2011 8:51:42 PM
I divide supercars into 3 types based on morphology:[mostly] aggressive/macho[mostly] feminine/curvy[almost equal] mix of aggressive and feminineThe first category is mostly populated with Lambos, and the Aventador would definitely be among the top choices in the first category, but I might just place the Murcielago equal to or above it, specifically the LP670-4 SuperVeloce and the original Murcielago, and perhaps one of the last iterations of the Gallardo. Not many old cars come to mind in this category, except the Countach, or for that matter, non-Lambos from any era.In the second category you have most Ferraris, Astons, and Porsches. Among modern cars, the F355, Vanquish, Virage (from 90s), DBS, Continental GT, MB SLS AMG, Pagani Zonda, and Carrera GT come to mind. Also Ford GT. Also Porsche 911 991. Also Jaguar XKR. Oh, and also the Ferrari F40! Too many old exotics here, and I am not up to speed with the names of old ones, but I would say many Ferraris, Maseratis, Alfa Romeos, Astons, and perhaps Porsches from the 50s, 60s, and 70s.Third category, I can think of the R8, Viper, Maserati GranTurismo, and LFA. Also Veyron SuperSport. Zonda and F40 sometimes fall in this category, in my mind.And that's just supercars. Lesser beasts (M3, Integra, etc), and luxury sedans (Jaguar XJ, Bentley, etc) are whole different cans of worms, not to mention, classic cars.[Edited on November 10, 2011 at 8:58 PM. Reason : ]
11/10/2011 8:53:59 PM
FD - needs to be lowered. pop-up headlights (when up) suck for looksshelby shooting brake thing? - butt's too bigold school ferrari thing - there's nothing pretty about those proportions458 italia - pretty damn cool. until an aventador shows upred ford race car - there's nothing pretty about those proportions (and that goes for all the rest of the ferraris, lamborghinis, and what-have-you from that era)miura - looks like some kind of frog/newt monster, although is a headlamp redesign away from truly beautifullotus esprit - does not stand the test of time... at allz3 coupe? - there's nothing pretty about those proportions. also suffers from sedan-front-end-stuck-on-a-sporty-profile syndrome240z - pretty damn hot but still has nothing on the aventadorlancia rally car - looks ridiculous. apples to oranges.superbirds - awful proportions, awful wings. chargers look 10x better.diablo - pretty damn hot but still has nothing on the aventador. i may like it more than the murcielago, at least. may.superveloce - has weird droopy mouth look going on[Edited on November 10, 2011 at 8:59 PM. Reason : ][Edited on November 10, 2011 at 9:01 PM. Reason : ]
11/10/2011 8:59:05 PM
11/10/2011 9:01:18 PM
^well the headlamps are huge, the gaping hole in the front fenders is weird, not a fan of the fender-mounted mirrors, the glass is all kinds of funky, the rear is all bulbous. it looks like a car drawn by a kid who can't draw, after watching a bunch of Speed Racer[Edited on November 10, 2011 at 9:03 PM. Reason : ]
11/10/2011 9:03:25 PM
^^^really? is this the worst attempt at trolling ever? for the record, I think that aventador lambo you linked looks like a fisher price tron carhttp://newtechinfo4u.blogspot.com/2011/05/lamborghini-aventador-2011.htmlbut obviously this is completely subjective so who the fuck cares? post more sexies.
11/10/2011 9:08:48 PM
more sexiescar seen in Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade (apparently a Rolls Royce Barker Saloon)the actual car *described* in Indiana Jones and the Last Crusadetop 5, I thinkmuch hotter than the original
11/10/2011 9:43:21 PM
whats that maserati run? nevermindhttp://www.maseratinyc.com/2012-maserati-gt-mc--c-2868.htm?location=manhattan&make=MASERATI&[Edited on November 10, 2011 at 9:59 PM. Reason : found it.]
11/10/2011 9:51:46 PM
as in price?or 1/4 mile?or 0-60 mph?$139,900 MSRP12.2 sex4.5 sex http://www.configurator.maserati.com/cc/?modelName=GTMC&country=1&language=usGo to configure.The special matt paint is a $20,500 option I configured all the way from 139,900 to a max of 181,430 [Edited on November 10, 2011 at 10:11 PM. Reason : ]
11/10/2011 9:59:59 PM
tchenku is just trolling...By the way, that "old school ferrari thing" is an Alfa Romeo Stradale. The front grill should have been a give away on the maker... You should really know WHAT the car is before you criticize it. It's a gorgeous car! Look at all those curves! One thing vehicles today lack are CURVES. The Stradale is so sleek and beautiful... They Daytona posted by sumfoo1 is another favorite of mine. The Ferrari 250 GTO (I believe the originator of this coupe styling) is beautiful, however, the Alfa Romeo is just slightly more voluptuous. A man who can't appreciate curves is pretty imo... You should also learn in what context to use the saying "apples to oranges.."When you get done sucking some Aventador cock, you are welcome to join back in to the discussion.Fender-mounted mirrors are the SHIT. Have you ever driven a car with one? having the mirrors farther forward on the vehicle help with 2 things:1. You don't have to adjust your head from viewing the road ahead to look in your mirror2. No blinds spots.While it may look "funky" it's simply because we aren't used to that adaptation of mirrors. I know that old school Japanese cars had mirrors adapted this way. I don't believe there's a modern day car like this anymore What the hell is beautiful about a box car? That Rolls Royce Barker Saloon is the best-looking car......if you were comparing it to enclosed golf carts...[Edited on November 10, 2011 at 10:17 PM. Reason : .]
11/10/2011 10:04:59 PM
I was with you until you made fun of the Rolls.So you mock someone because they can't see the beauty in cars from the 50s and 60s, but then you go ahead and mock someone because they *do* see beauty in cars from the 20s... and it happens to be the same someone!!!11Awesome.[Edited on November 10, 2011 at 10:38 PM. Reason : ]
11/10/2011 10:37:07 PM
+1 for Ferrari 250 GTO
11/10/2011 10:40:45 PM
^^ You are correct.I apologize tchenku
11/11/2011 12:05:30 AM
+1 240Z+1 AC CobraI like the look of Lambos, but only when they're sitting still or cruising. Something about the design just falls to pieces when its leaning into a corner at speed.
11/11/2011 12:19:28 AM
i dont waste effort trolling. those are my real thoughts on those cars.
11/11/2011 5:40:22 AM
even today when i see one of these, i stop what im doing and drool.
11/11/2011 6:39:57 AM
^ LOL upon LOL, good sir the maserati is indeed pretty bangin.
11/11/2011 7:47:09 AM
Just to let everyone know, the Alfa Stradale is a road car (VERY limited production) and not a race car.From the 60's I'd have to go with a Jaguar MK II. Even better, one with fender mounted mirrors!!!I'm surprised the Old MB Gull wing hasn't been mentioned yet...[Edited on November 11, 2011 at 8:05 AM. Reason : .]
11/11/2011 8:01:20 AM
11/11/2011 8:47:18 AM
^allow me And no love yet for the E Type??Obviously nobody is right or wrong as styling is an opinion. The Italia has some nice curves but I think the front of the car is hideous and ruins it all for me.
11/11/2011 9:01:51 AM
11/11/2011 10:15:08 AM
You guys sure like the fD stance from behind...
11/11/2011 10:18:03 AM
I like the FD but i don't think its top 5.. but probably top 10 I like the LF-A look as well as the FR-S look.. both better then the FD
11/11/2011 10:23:32 AM
^I disagree and also admit that I love the FD. However if we're talking about the best looking Japanese car (that's somewhat contemporary)...
11/11/2011 10:28:52 AM
other cars to consider(contemporary made me think of it) I love the 2000gt (this coming from a '57 t-bird owner i love my bird but it no longer makes me double-take)and this starliner[Edited on November 11, 2011 at 10:39 AM. Reason : oooof ]
11/11/2011 10:35:30 AM
11/11/2011 11:09:00 AM
lol i figured as much that's why i had to give you props for making me think of it.
11/11/2011 11:18:30 AM
11/11/2011 12:46:35 PM
Definitely agree on the 250GTO, the E-Type and Mark II, and the 2000GT.My favorite:I do also like the BMW E9, and its successor E24:
11/11/2011 4:56:32 PM
11/11/2011 5:12:01 PM
I didn't go far enough down the Jag road, evidently. I will see you your XJR Portfolio and raise you an XJ12C:And, for the record, I don't mind the vertical tails on the current XJ.
11/11/2011 5:32:04 PM
^ nice!!! and i can't really compare that with the portfolio and declare a single winner....mine is a gorgeous modern interpretation of the same design, so i don't see them as distinct enough to compare them.
11/11/2011 6:04:10 PM
The new jags look awesome the old ones look like doodoo
11/11/2011 11:45:24 PM
I've seen MkII priced from $35k and up...Oh mah gah...I kinda want one now...[Edited on November 12, 2011 at 7:36 AM. Reason : .]
11/12/2011 7:36:42 AM
I'm not sure how anyone can find the new Jaguar XJ attractive with those atrocious "blacked out" rear D pillars.
11/12/2011 12:05:40 PM
11/12/2011 11:35:29 PM
What year is that? ^Always loved the old Jag Roadsters
11/12/2011 11:41:14 PM