I just got done test driving both. I think the mdx is the better deal on paper (size, technology, etc) but the q5 is a way funner drive. And I thought the mdx was supposed to be sporty. And that was the four cylinder q5. But to make it comparable to mdx costs like 10 - 15k, which would be comparable in price but obviously not size. And the maintenance costs will probably be higher. I need a fourth opinion. Which would you get?

9/6/2010 5:59:32 PM

BMW X1

P.S. Put your flame suit on for wanting an SUV!

P.P.S. And I bet the Infiniti EX37 (or FX37) is funner than the four-pot Q5, but comparable in price, maybe even cheaper.


[Edited on September 6, 2010 at 7:33 PM. Reason : ]

9/6/2010 7:22:47 PM

Toyota 4Runner

9/6/2010 7:29:06 PM

acura = ugly as sin

and isnt the audi the segment leader?

9/6/2010 8:04:45 PM

crossovers are retarded, pointless, ugly, and not good at anything.

9/6/2010 9:09:51 PM

SUV =/ sporty

9/6/2010 10:14:13 PM

PORSCHE MAKES ONE. YOU TAKE THAT BACK CRIPPLE>

9/6/2010 10:18:17 PM

Q5 looks much much better imo

9/6/2010 11:58:03 PM

Q5.. if you want sporty X5M

9/7/2010 8:31:41 AM

if you want sporty, get a fucking car

if you want to haul or tow anything, get a truck (or truck-based SUV)

if you want to look like a complete locker-room faggot who spent more to own less, in the form of an utterly pointless, useless neo-minivan (except that minivans are practical and, somehow, more suitable for a self-respecting man to drive), buy a crossover.

9/7/2010 5:19:57 PM

^

9/7/2010 11:44:48 PM

i drive a 95 ford windstar, lol. IM A MAN

9/8/2010 7:26:27 AM

I'm about to buy a reliable beater/hauler/tower/off-roader/daily-driver/gas-saver used Subaru Forester. The original ass-ugly mommy crossover. I may be a complete locker-room faggot, but at least I'll have the most practical vehicle ever

9/8/2010 10:00:45 AM

subarus are OK (although that is my least favorite model)

9/8/2010 10:17:35 PM