O hai. This here's the New South. Now y'all might think it looks just like the Old South, but y'see, we're running this place with what we like to call "compassionate conservatism"
1/26/2010 3:48:20 AM
It's South Carolina. He'll just say it's what God told him to say and be elected as Governor in a landslide.[Edited on January 26, 2010 at 7:55 AM. Reason : /]
1/26/2010 7:55:06 AM
it's true.if the government feeds you, why go anywhere else? you'd just come back for more. then these leeches may procreate, teach their offspring the same type of behavior (don't work for yourself, the government will do it for you)... so I don't agree with the "they don't know any better" cause many people sure to know that the government will hand shit out again and again, and these leeches depend on that.
1/26/2010 8:32:11 AM
^We should just kill poor people, shouldn't we?
1/26/2010 8:41:09 AM
B-b-b-b-b-but... they're people. It's their right to breed out of control and have as many babies as they can.
1/26/2010 8:45:24 AM
This isn't fucking Democratic Republic of Congo. We don't have "out of control" breeding. We're a goddamn first world country, act like one.
1/26/2010 8:48:07 AM
1/26/2010 8:51:50 AM
God, I'm not just talking about the United States of America. And way to shit on the proud people of The Democratic Republic of Congo.
1/26/2010 8:58:04 AM
thinly veiled racism
1/26/2010 9:05:03 AM
It isn't really thinly veiled.I mean he should have just gone out and said "Shaniqua with her eight jungle babies at Wal-mart"
1/26/2010 9:05:44 AM
^ it’s veiled enoughIt own’t be too long before someone pops in and says “bbbbbut he wasn’t BEING racist!!”
1/26/2010 9:06:39 AM
Internet-High Five!Luckily overpopulation is a self-correcting problem. Hopefully it won't self-correct until I've checked out.[Edited on January 26, 2010 at 9:09 AM. Reason : .]
1/26/2010 9:08:17 AM
^ i can’t tell if youre joking in this thread or not, but weren’t you the one who admitted to having a horribly racist family? It’s not surprising this type of racism is “normal” to you.
1/26/2010 9:10:11 AM
This wont be done anytime soon but...Hes got a good point. Yes it was understood wrong, but it is a problem, and this is a good way to try to solve it. It would fix a lot of budget issues and also at the very least get crime reduced (drugs) and get parents involved in their kids schools. Thinking more, the government could implement this as its meant to punish the adult, not the kids. They take the kids and put them in foster care (yes I know this causes more issues) but then they cant say they are punishing the kids by taking away what they need, but their parents lose out till they fix themselves.
1/26/2010 9:11:36 AM
Jesus. You people.Do you really think that the poorest kids, who are forced to sign up for the free lunch because they're so poor, get bad grades because they get government handouts? Do you REALLY believe this?
1/26/2010 9:13:32 AM
no... who said that?
1/26/2010 9:15:13 AM
Obviously, the analogy made by the South Carolina lieutenant governor is stupid and wrong. And, apparently, he has already expressed regrets for the remark.http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics/AP/story/1446283.htmlBut why do you have to make it about the South, schmoe? As if there have never been race-related comments and problems in New York, Chicago, Boston, Los Angeles, and so on. And have you heard of Joe Biden of Delaware?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIT3jUrNTX0Or Harry Reid of Nevada?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b8YNIp29r9QAnd so on.
1/26/2010 9:18:21 AM
Ahh, yes. Because making a comment about Indians working in convenience stores is the same as calling poor people animals and saying that they need their benefits cut as such.
1/26/2010 9:21:29 AM
1/26/2010 9:23:02 AM
Plz to explain how me caring about the population of the world = racism?Anyone having too many babies = overpopulation. This is a species problem, not a race problem. It has nothing to do with melanin levels in the skin or imaginary boundaries on the ground.
1/26/2010 9:24:24 AM
1/26/2010 9:28:15 AM
1/26/2010 9:28:53 AM
1/26/2010 9:30:53 AM
1/26/2010 9:30:56 AM
1/26/2010 9:35:22 AM
Sweet, quote war.
1/26/2010 9:36:10 AM
1/26/2010 9:40:32 AM
How does "intelligent family planning" = nazi? I in no way support forced sterilization. I am in support of my taxes paying for voluntary birth control and greatly enhanced sex education and availability of birth control.
1/26/2010 9:50:42 AM
Godwin's Law!
1/26/2010 9:52:23 AM
I imagine that God is just like Gary the preacher, only God believes what he says is true. And it's not only rich white people, my father, who is financially well-off, did not receive institutionalized benefits that provided his level of income. He started off working in a textile mill on 3rd shift. Over the years he worked hard and got promoted. His salary followed. Yet, you lefties call him evil and undeserving and wish to take his hard earned money and distribute it to others because they deserve it more.but let me guess. your excuse is that since my dad is white he was promoted and given an unfairly high salary while the company's big men whipped and beat minorities who they paid by throwing a nickle at them every week? [Edited on January 26, 2010 at 10:01 AM. Reason : ,]
1/26/2010 9:57:57 AM
He is republican and from South Carolina and white! He said something about black poor people! GODDAMN FUCKING RACIST!Thank god all of us college students/grads are educated beyond the point of discrimination!
1/26/2010 10:06:45 AM
Kids get bad grades because they have horrible parents. Not everyone is qualified to be a parent. Yeah, I know BridgetSPK et al believe that everyone has the right to 5 kids and the government should pay for all of them. Some people just aren't good at raising children, and they're too stupid to understand the consequences of their actions.People will say, "we shouldn't punish children for the actions of their parents." If you don't understand the concept of moral hazard, you will never be able to come up with good policies. As long as we have a system that rewards irresponsible behavior, you'll have a lot of people acting irresponsibly. Modern liberals reject the concept of moral hazard, for the most part. They think the people will simply behave the same no matter what government policies are. They think people will save and borrow at the same rate, regardless of interest rates. They think people will never take advantage of welfare if it's available, and that it will only benefit the "most needy," and the "less needy" will just work hard and not attempt to use welfare.There is a balance that exists in nature where every animal must determine and evaluate potential threats. Fear of death and the will to survive have been guiding animals for millions of years. Fear overrides every instinct we have. The current system attempts to remove the component of consequence from human behavior. This distorts the economy horribly. People need to be fearful, because it drives them to act responsibly and prepare for unexpected events. When there is a safety net, people will act less responsibly and prepare less.
1/26/2010 10:09:07 AM
The Republicans are responsible for all things Nazi!--Keith Olbermann and God
1/26/2010 10:20:08 AM
1/26/2010 10:22:33 AM
1/26/2010 10:31:50 AM
1/26/2010 11:13:11 AM
It would be far better to spend the extra money to properly educate their "excess" children now. It would cost more, but eventually their children will put more into the system then they take out. Combine that with the fact that they'll be better able to provide and foster their own childern, and you'll breed out the problem in a few generations.
1/26/2010 11:19:18 AM
No, see, becausefuck you, got mine.
1/26/2010 11:22:48 AM
Then you run into the problem in poorly educated communities where "learning" isn't cool. It's very rare for a kid to push themselves in school. It takes parents that are going to make them attend school, force them to do homework, and communicate with teachers. I went to Apex High, and as I'm sure was the case in most Wake County schools, the teachers were fine. There were still students that weren't interested in learning; they were there because they had to be there. Having good teachers, books, and facilities will never be enough. Education is not fun, and there has to be someone in a kid's life pushing them and holding them accountable.
1/26/2010 11:25:40 AM
1/26/2010 11:27:58 AM
^^Its going to require alot of work to get in there and fix those schools. Its probably going to require non-standard teaching methods and maybe other financial support for the families of the children. It can be done though. By far the biggest problem is going to be resistance from local government who dont want to give up control over their fiefdom.[Edited on January 26, 2010 at 11:29 AM. Reason : ^^]
1/26/2010 11:28:42 AM
1/26/2010 11:29:05 AM
You can give a man a fish and feed him for a day. You can teach a man to fish and feed him for a life time.
1/26/2010 11:36:11 AM
i wonder how long it will take until when someone brings up possible solutions to population problems and intelligent family planning without someone mentioning nazis. i think it will be the same time the small mustache is acceptable.
1/26/2010 11:51:29 AM
1/26/2010 12:16:30 PM
whether you agree with what he said or not, can we all agree that he is without a doubt a bumbling idiot for making those statements in public? if i were a SC voter, i wouldn't vote for him strictly on grounds that he doesn't think before he talks, and will likely make my state look like it's full of a bunch of backwards hicks.i mean, anyone who agrees with these comments was likely going to vote for him anyway. no way these statements won him any new votes...
1/26/2010 12:19:49 PM
1/26/2010 12:22:41 PM
The best way to handle overpopulation is through individual responsible decision-making about procreation. If someone is incapable of this, and they pop out more babies than they can afford, the state should and does take the children. However...Right now, if they pop out more babies than they can afford, they get welfare money -- or additional welfare money if they already received it. This. This is total bullshit. If your irresponsible ass has kids when you shouldn't -- you should lose the kids at the first sign of trouble. You should NOT be "rewarded" with more "free money". Period.
1/26/2010 12:29:56 PM
yous best not be tukin my babies. i be workin hard since 15 to make my foo babies by time ize 22[Edited on January 26, 2010 at 12:32 PM. Reason : h]
1/26/2010 12:32:24 PM
If you can't afford to raise and support your children properly, then you shouldn't have children. Really want children but can't afford it? Well there's your incentive to work harder and elevate your standard of living.Unfortunately a lot of people are lazy and since the gov't is more than happy to provide money to them they don't care about improving their lives.Is this a generalized statement? Sure, there are exceptions.
1/26/2010 12:34:03 PM