I heard a bit of this on BBC radio the other night and thought that it might be fodder for discussion here.
12/6/2009 7:20:47 PM
i had never heard of this until I saw this picture set last week. http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2009/11/25th_anniversary_of_the_bhopal.htmlamazing what you can get away with if you have a little bit of money....
12/6/2009 7:31:32 PM
The BBC also has a podcast about this:http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/podcasts/worldservice/docarchive/docarchive_20091203-1545b.mp3Haven't listened to it yet, though.With regards to Dow--when one company buys another, assets and liabilities are generally both included, including any legal liabilities.
12/6/2009 7:33:39 PM
it's a shame that India decided to just place all the blame on Union Carbide and fail to realize that the vast majority of the fatalities could have been avoided if they had set up zoning districts for residential and industrial use. It was a bunch of local idiots that decided to leave the scrubber tanks empty while the plant was operational, not Americans.
12/6/2009 7:58:33 PM
Well, in reality their exposure to natural carcinogens is so much higher than this RAWR RAWR RAWR.
12/6/2009 8:01:39 PM
Another complication for liability:
12/6/2009 8:01:45 PM
12/6/2009 8:26:53 PM
Union Carbide Corporation and Union Carbide India Limited are not unreasonable candidates for liability. I wouldn't expect their successors to be unreasonable candidates for liability either. Eveready may also be liable for damages, depending on how the liabilities were divvied up when Union Carbide India was sold.I'm curious about the corporate relationships--Eveready was at one point owned by Union Carbide.-----http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhopal_disaster#Settlement_fund_hoaxThe Yes Men played Bhopal pretty much the same way they just played the US Chamber of Commerce.
12/6/2009 8:30:58 PM
^^so you're saying that if the workers at a Toyota plant in the U.S. were to accidentally vent cyanide gas into the local community, it would all be Japan's fault and they should pay us for the incompetence of our own citizens?
12/6/2009 8:38:09 PM
It wouldn't be Japan's fault, it would be Toyota's fault.
12/6/2009 8:39:05 PM
lol, my dad used to work for union carbide developing pesticides. The entire AG division was bought by the company Rhone Pulounc after this disaster. I dont think RP bought any liability though as the parent company of Union Carbide was still around.
12/6/2009 9:46:54 PM
12/7/2009 5:17:49 AM
I have not read up on this exact case, but from my understanding of Indian industrial policy back in the 80s, foreign firms doing business in India were required to do business partnered with a native Indian company. Therefore, while Union Carbide was liable for the disaster, the chain of authority over the equipment in question probably never left India. Even if UC thought safety standards were being sacrificed in the plant, their only means of complaint would have been to either bribe their involuntary partner or abandon the plant and pull out of India all together.
12/7/2009 10:30:03 AM
I found the NPR piece interesting because it focused its wrath on Union Carbide while letting the Indian government off lightly over this incident. Yes, Union Carbide screwed up big, but the Indian government deserves a share of the blame for how they handled the incident, particularly in letting Union Carbide off so lightly (by the article's standards at least) and shutting down any further appeal attempts at the national level. Given how strongly it was shut down by their courts, I don't think there's any chance of the issue being resurrected by their government barring a complete toppling of the Indian government.So how does the liability work? If the subsidiary that caused the accident was sold to Eveready but the larger mother company, Union Carbide, was purchased by Dow, who is responsible? Both?
12/7/2009 4:45:53 PM
Interesting follow-up:
6/20/2010 4:15:46 PM
6/20/2010 4:32:20 PM
Actually:
6/20/2010 6:23:42 PM