interesting trends.


lee fowler took over in 2000.

11/10/2009 4:48:14 PM

If only every year was 1974

11/10/2009 4:58:04 PM

edit: never mind - conf. only graph.

Might as well make the post somewhat meaningful. Red dots represent conference championships.

[Edited on November 10, 2009 at 5:10 PM. Reason : -]

11/10/2009 4:58:56 PM

oh, snap! what's the slope of the last two points? extrapolate and find this year's awesomeness.

11/10/2009 5:08:11 PM

man, 93 was rough

11/10/2009 5:12:01 PM

^ Lakista McCuller, Ricky Daniels, Curtis Marshall, Mark Davis...a team for the ages

11/10/2009 5:18:26 PM

look at sendek's slope vs. lowe's...

11/10/2009 5:44:42 PM

Hey! We're at the same point we were at right before 72/73! A sign of good things to come?!?!?!

11/10/2009 6:01:50 PM

Don't get your hopes up.

11/10/2009 6:18:07 PM

Quote :

"interesting trends."

what trends?

11/10/2009 9:33:11 PM

4 of sendek's final five years we were over .500 in league play; not too shabby

11/10/2009 9:38:22 PM

this graph is dumb

11/10/2009 9:42:19 PM

Quote :

"lee fowler took over in 2000."

this is completely irrelevant b/c he hasnt made a bball related decision since he got here, and didnt even have to pretend to until after sendek left.

11/10/2009 10:03:09 PM

i would be interested to see a side by side comparison of all ACC teams.

It seems that minus a few spots here and there that we are very inconsistent. The graph is up one year, down the next, back up, back down, etc.

11/11/2009 2:25:56 AM

Quote :

"Red dots represent conference championships."

So we won a conference championship with a below .500 winning % in 1987, or I'm color blind?


So you're saying we've sucked forever, good call, captain obvious.

11/11/2009 2:34:56 AM

^

Quote :

"In 1987, after a sixth place finish in the regular season, NC State made another surprising run through the ACC Tournament. In the championship game, they defeated rival North Carolina, who had gone undefeated in conference play. It was the program's last ACC championship to date."

11/11/2009 3:09:41 AM

am I the only one who cant seeany graph or link to one?

11/11/2009 7:36:18 AM

am I the only one who cant seeany graph or link to one?

11/11/2009 7:36:18 AM

Yep, you're also the only tard who double posted.

11/11/2009 8:14:06 AM

meaningless graph.

11/11/2009 8:27:53 AM

I think I made that graph a long time ago.

At any rate:





Trendlines added. 2nd degree polynomial

11/11/2009 9:20:22 AM

Now I get it

11/11/2009 9:31:57 AM

So the only two coaches who consistently trended upward were V and Sendek?

11/11/2009 9:37:58 AM

Depends on how you format the trendline.

3rd power polynomials give them both a peak right before their time at State ended. Case also heads up towards the end and Les does worse.

11/11/2009 9:51:51 AM

bring back Les! I've never seen such amazing consistency.

11/11/2009 10:26:05 AM

Divided by coaches. Eyeball approximation for best line fit:

11/11/2009 11:06:30 AM

INTERESTING TRENDS

11/11/2009 11:32:19 AM

11/11/2009 11:56:01 AM

INTERESTING TRENDS

11/11/2009 11:57:24 AM

11/11/2009 12:00:13 PM

nice.

11/11/2009 1:19:10 PM

11/11/2009 1:35:25 PM