If any of you guys have been following the status of the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter that was launched last month, NASA just released some pictures that it recently took of the Moon's surface. If you look close enough, you can see the Apollo lunar modules still there. Pretty awesome.http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/multimedia/lroimages/apollosites.html[Edited on July 17, 2009 at 1:47 PM. Reason : moar]
7/17/2009 1:41:31 PM
cooool
7/17/2009 1:44:19 PM
Take that conspiracy moonbats!
7/17/2009 1:56:41 PM
...i can tell by the pixels.and having seen quite a few photoshops in my day.
7/17/2009 1:59:23 PM
lol at lame attempt. Crank that lens up a few thousand more times for me
7/17/2009 2:06:18 PM
lol they could just point to random dots and nobody would be the wiser
7/17/2009 2:13:51 PM
Big DealShow me a 40 year old fossilized Neil Armstrong turd and I'll be impressed
7/17/2009 2:33:54 PM
I like how the moon was NASA's personal landfill. awesome.
7/17/2009 2:35:19 PM
There are no hippies on the moon.Thas why Da moon rulez #1.
7/17/2009 2:38:35 PM
Those have to be some of the worst places to lose your keys.
7/17/2009 2:54:14 PM
Obviously a photoshop. Richard Hoagland will shortly apply his intellect to prove it. He can tell by the pixels. See some of his previous work for examples of how he's going to expose this conspiracy:
7/17/2009 3:56:33 PM
Those were just the images taken as the LRO reached orbit. Once it reaches it's optimal orbit which will be closer to the surface, it should be able to take some pictures with a lot higher resolution.
7/17/2009 4:28:39 PM
Pixels have feelings too
7/17/2009 4:39:47 PM
Photoshop!
7/17/2009 4:49:27 PM
7/17/2009 5:02:25 PM
Oh sure, they can shoot something into space, but throwing a 10MP camera on there?Out of the question![Edited on July 17, 2009 at 5:40 PM. Reason : (I think it'll actually be pretty cool once they get some better shots)]
7/17/2009 5:39:45 PM
pretty neat. maybe they can finally put this issue to rest. ok so i know that can never happen. why would anyone NOT want to BELIEVE?
7/17/2009 6:13:56 PM
what about Apollo 13?? yeah see oh wait
7/17/2009 6:57:19 PM
7/17/2009 7:26:08 PM
in no way is that convincing. sorry.
7/17/2009 8:16:21 PM
show me the flag!
7/18/2009 2:14:10 PM
I didn't wanna start a new thread since this one is so closely related, but for all of you non-space nerds out there, today marks the 40th anniversary of Apollo 11's landing on the moon!
7/20/2009 8:43:43 AM
landing in 7 hours, 10 minuteshttp://wechoosethemoon.org
7/20/2009 9:07:49 AM
7/20/2009 9:45:49 AM
Wraith, made a thread about it this am.
7/20/2009 10:50:38 AM
Hey Wraith son, we never landed on the moon, so this is impossible. So seriously, how do the moon conspiracy people explain this away? I guess it is pretty simple if you're that convinced. You can just be like, "Oh, those are fake" and go about your day. ]
7/20/2009 10:56:55 AM
I'm not one of those conspiracy nuts........but what's this crap about NASA losing the original high quality moon-landing video footage?How do you lose that?
7/20/2009 11:06:25 AM
They needed blank tapes to record Alf... and tapes aren't cheap.
7/20/2009 11:14:00 AM
^^ the originals were beamed to and recorded in Australia first, before being transmitted to the US. And they probably had thousands of reels that took up huge storerooms, mixed in with thousands of reels of other types of data. It's hard to believe, but not totally out of the realm of possibility that the reels were just mixed up or were mislabeled or something.
7/20/2009 11:48:55 AM
i just heard how NASA DESTROYED the original tape, and that the recently "remastered" tapes were from old CBS tape and the like
7/20/2009 12:07:43 PM
I just saw the video from a couple years ago where Buzz punched that dude in the face for calling him a liar and a cowardfucking hilarious[Edited on July 21, 2009 at 7:46 AM. Reason : .]
7/21/2009 7:45:44 AM
On the topic of Buzz Lightyear...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTKedyQQkZQ
7/21/2009 9:01:15 AM
Whoopi Goldberg sees through the NASA conspiracy.http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2009/07/20/whoopi_goldberg_entertains_moon_landing_conspiracy_theories.html
7/21/2009 1:38:42 PM
What a fucking idiot. Doesn't the view have that lady on it who said she wasn't sure if the world was round or flat?
7/21/2009 1:42:15 PM
god. yes. she's fucking stupid. whoopie, in some of the scenes I've seen with that retard, is usually smart. Her stuff about the moon here has been shot down so many times it's not even worth of response.[Edited on July 21, 2009 at 3:57 PM. Reason : .]
7/21/2009 3:48:24 PM
ITT I disprove theories that suggest the Moon landing was a hoax.As Whoopi pointed out:- Who filmed Armstrong and Aldrin getting out of the capsule and moving around?The camera that recorded the first steps was mounted to the outside of the capsule. It was pointed directly at the ladder for the sole purpose of catching the first steps. Since it was one of the most important achievements in history, NASA figured it might be cool to get it on film. Other shots were set up by mounting cameras to tripods/other equipment. Not too hard to figure that one out, Whoopi.- Why was the flag "rippling"?Aside from a regular flagpole holding it up, it had one across the top to keep it from slouching down so that it always remained upright. Even slightly nudging the flagpole would cause the flag to sway back and forth. In the Earth's atmosphere, this would damp out pretty quickly. The moon has no atmosphere though, so it acted almost like a pendulum, damping out only under the friction of the flag against the pole.
7/22/2009 1:00:37 AM
Durr...why can't I see any stars in any of the pictures? Why are the shadows messed up? Why is there a C on that rock? durr durr durr
7/22/2009 9:13:03 AM
ask Buzz Aldrin about thathttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOo6aHSY8hU
7/22/2009 6:16:17 PM