Do they have anything similar to NCSU's grade distribution reports? Link anyone?TYIA
5/12/2009 3:59:52 PM
i'll let someone google that for you
5/12/2009 4:02:47 PM
I must be bad at googling, did not find it...
5/12/2009 4:06:28 PM
Generalities:http://www.unc.edu/faculty/faccoun/reports/2003-04/R04EDP1.htm
5/12/2009 5:23:42 PM
it's pretty bad when you come out and say "we're too embarrassed by our inflated grades"
5/12/2009 5:50:30 PM
^^l-o-fucking-lI don't see any reason why the grade distribution of a public university should not be available to the public.
5/12/2009 6:33:58 PM
Wow
5/12/2009 6:39:56 PM
lawl i'm not even sure how to look at this scenario
5/12/2009 6:56:01 PM
wow that's pretty bad
5/12/2009 6:57:15 PM
5/12/2009 6:59:16 PM
Wasn't there an article in the N&O recently saying that 83% of all grades given at UNC were As?
5/12/2009 9:49:32 PM
According to that report I linked above, in the spring of '03, 40% were As and roughly another 40% were Bs.Couldn't find the same type of data for State, just the course-by-course numbers. Seems pretty high, but I'm not really sure how it compares to other schools.
5/12/2009 9:53:14 PM
if that includes grad courses, then it's not really that big of a deal
5/12/2009 9:54:51 PM
nope, undergrad only
5/12/2009 9:57:25 PM
I teach math at a large public university we have very lenient admissions standards, but this semester I gave out (I believe) 3 A's and 8 F's in a class of 37 peoplemaybe at Carolina it's the other way around...hard to get into, but easy once you're in]
5/12/2009 10:04:41 PM
Here we go:http://www.newsobserver.com/opinion/columns/story/1416322.htmlfrom the creator of http://www.gradeinflation.com/
5/12/2009 10:08:07 PM
^I would assume that's usually because there isn't much to argue about on an objective exam. If you got the answer wrong, it's wrong. There's not really anything to talk about unless you thought the exam was "unfair" in some way, but this is usually very rare because everyone knows exactly what material they are expected to know.V agreed.[Edited on May 12, 2009 at 10:20 PM. Reason : .]
5/12/2009 10:13:19 PM
5/12/2009 10:13:30 PM
if there is a discrepancy, its probably more likely due to different subject matter than anything else. at ncsu, i'd have to try hard to get less than a C in a humanities course. if you look at the distribution for eng331/eng101, for example, most students are in the A-B range:http://www-records.ncsu.edu/cgi-bin/grddist3.pl?semyear=108&curr=ENG&num=331http://www-records.ncsu.edu/cgi-bin/grddist3.pl?semyear=108&curr=ENG&num=101so i'm not sure why anyone would be up in arms at unc doing the same.in contrast, i handed out pretty flat grade curves for unc's equivalent of csc116 (i.e. equal A's, B's, C's and D's). The other grad instructors gave similar grades, although theirs tended to be more bimodal (e.g. lots of As and lots of Fs). compare that to ncsu's distribution, where it's dominated by As and Bs:http://www-records.ncsu.edu/cgi-bin/grddist3.pl?semyear=108&curr=CSC&num=116i understand that unc and ncsu are "sports rivals" but its silly to harp on the idea that unc students have "inflated grades" compared to ncsu (or other stupid lounge-talk claims like "ZOMG UNC CAUSES DEPRESSION!1"). both schools are pretty much the same: they reward you for minimal effort, devaluing the worth of a degree. the only difference i've noticed is that unc has a higher concentration of breasts.
5/13/2009 1:08:54 AM
5/13/2009 1:19:51 AM
http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=178&f=2515&t=4324335
5/13/2009 1:24:39 AM
5/13/2009 9:46:47 AM
5/13/2009 9:52:15 AM
5/13/2009 10:05:19 AM
5/13/2009 10:05:50 AM
5/13/2009 10:08:31 AM