Scientology international headquarters seeks ban on HIV+ protesters
1/13/2009 3:38:58 PM
Typically I try not to post Gay issues, but this amazed me. Peaceful protesters in front of the Church of Scientology were not only hassled, but two of the men, who were HIV+, had their HIV status disclosed publicly.I'm not 100% certain on the legality of it all, but it states clearly that the "Church" found their status illegally.This is only a case of two men, but now, not only have they publicly announced their HIV status, they are seeking a ban on the protesters due to being HIV+.First amendment anybody?
1/13/2009 3:39:37 PM
Yeah, this should have hit Soap Box sorry, I'll wait on the move to prevent a double post.
1/13/2009 3:44:23 PM
Do I smell a law suit?
1/13/2009 3:46:08 PM
What amazes me is how some people think of those with HIV as second class.Just change HIV+ to Black and the headline would spark so much interest and action from people.I hope this blows up in the media, and I feel sorry for those two guys.
1/13/2009 3:49:00 PM
eh, the difference between being black and having hiv+ is the fact that people are born black. its possible that they were raped and got HIV, but you can't really make that comparison in general.your argument has failed.I'm Big Business and i approved this message.
1/13/2009 3:50:57 PM
^BECAUSE ANALOGIES ONLY WORK IF EVERYTHING IS EXACTLY THE SAME!!!!..........THEREBY DEFEATING THE PURPOSE OF MAKING ONE IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!!!111 (analogies were removed from the SAT because people like you are too stupid to learn how they work.)
1/13/2009 4:01:42 PM
bait takenI'm Big Business and i approved this message.
1/13/2009 4:03:17 PM
1/13/2009 4:06:11 PM
disclosing personal health information...well hell, thats why clinton signed HIPAAthose two need to sue scientology
1/13/2009 4:07:17 PM
1/13/2009 4:08:00 PM
careI'd love to hate on scientology but you've got to give me more than this
1/13/2009 4:17:35 PM
^^ have you actually read there beliefs etc. in details. seriously bat shit crazy people. I wonder if there are any scientologists on tww.
1/13/2009 4:24:41 PM
their, THEIR, goddamnit woman the word is THEIR.
1/13/2009 4:29:30 PM
I love Scientology [Edited on January 13, 2009 at 4:31 PM. Reason : ]
1/13/2009 4:30:38 PM
1/13/2009 4:31:53 PM
ALkatraz I think so... people tend to write off HIV+ issues as gay only still. However the disease can infect anybody (though this issue is gay oriented).GoldenGirl, that they are, that they are! Seriously, makes you question a friendship when you find out somebody is a Scientologist.gunzz you are awesome +1!Aficionado the kicker is that Scientology is not a health provider, I don't know if HIPAA applies here. I know it would apply to the medical offices that provided the information to the Church.
1/13/2009 4:46:21 PM
1/13/2009 4:53:28 PM
1/13/2009 10:59:51 PM
[Edited on January 14, 2009 at 1:59 PM. Reason : []
1/14/2009 1:59:16 PM
even though they've never actually done the slightest harm to me or my family/friends.i don't think i could possibly despise the Church of Scientology any more than i already do.i wonder why? it's so irrational.Don't get me wrong: i have plenty of scorn and ridicule for, say, Mormons and other goofy cults ... but the CoS? man, they just damn near infuriate me.[Edited on January 14, 2009 at 6:59 PM. Reason : ]
1/14/2009 6:55:49 PM
Southern California is a really fucked up place. This is hardly a Scientology issue. Seriously, it's a SoCal issue. It's just not a place that should exist, in its current state. It drags down the rest of California, it drags down humanity. I propose a reverse civil war -- can we voluntarily "secede" them?
1/15/2009 4:22:20 AM
wut?
1/15/2009 3:07:57 PM
Fun fact: The Church of Scientology (tm) threatened to sue me for buying http://www.scientlology.com because the word "Scientology"(tm) is a registered trademark. I hope they don't threaten to sue me for telling people that they threatened to sue me.
1/15/2009 3:12:08 PM
interesting. as in "it's interesting that you would attempt such a thing" because you know, you can't appropriate someone else's registered trademark. they have every right to sue over that. I mean, why not just register a site, "www.wal-mart.com" and post a bunch of anti walmart propaganda?theres literally a ton of shady practices that the Church of Scientology engages in that should be ridiculed. But this is not one of them. So I'm kind of annoyed to be in the position to defend the CoS :-\[Edited on January 15, 2009 at 3:18 PM. Reason : ]
1/15/2009 3:15:22 PM
More like if you registered walolmart.com....But then there's the issue of a "religion" trademarking the name of the religion, copyrighting every piece of written information associated with said religion, and suing the pants off of anybody who so much as makes a peep about it.
1/15/2009 3:22:50 PM
Scientology makes me wish there was such a thing as BATMAN
1/15/2009 6:01:28 PM
1/15/2009 7:17:18 PM
who says John Travolta and Tom Cruise are smart?Although....., I hear Beck is into it. ..... maybe I'll give it a try
1/15/2009 7:32:33 PM
^^^^ aha... i missed the LOL you're right. i agree with you.
1/15/2009 8:12:42 PM
^^^ The majority of the scientology "lore" that's out there regarding the crazier things (like the B52 bombers) I don't think has ever been officially confirmed. For all we know, that might be completely false, and the Scientologists just don't care to correct it. It is puzzling though how otherwise reasonable people could buy that, if that is what the actual beliefs are.
1/15/2009 8:22:01 PM
we dont need to have the B52s.Lord Xenu hiding in the volcano is enough.
1/15/2009 8:23:39 PM
Lord Xenu isn't hiding in the volcano, he dropped his alien prisoners into the volcano, and now their spirits are flying around making people feel sad feelings.[/what scientologists actually believe]
1/15/2009 8:31:17 PM
1/19/2009 9:54:02 AM
^ that is correct. whoever said that is confusting the two .Scientologists don't belief in "psychological problems"... for them, everything is due to aliens in volcanoes.
1/19/2009 11:11:40 AM
^, ^^ - the two of you are agreeing on contradictory statements. Here was my original quote (in full)
1/19/2009 6:19:19 PM
1/20/2009 12:21:06 AM
^ lol
1/20/2009 12:47:19 AM
1/21/2009 4:59:25 PM
that's an awesome album.i should pirate buy a replacement copy for my CD that was stolen.
1/21/2009 7:00:27 PM
i'll side with Vince from ShamWow over Scientology any dayeven though they both sell crap
1/21/2009 7:06:27 PM
what about Spence?
1/21/2009 7:14:37 PM
Spence is in the executive branch ]
1/21/2009 7:15:41 PM
touche
1/21/2009 7:28:52 PM
1/21/2009 9:50:02 PM