was listening to jim rome and heard that if you look at the history of line maker's odds and how often they are right it is beyond astonishingexample: last nights laker vs. spurs line was lakers by 7 1/2 pointswith seconds left lakers were up by 5, spurs quit playing and some moron went and took a 3 pointer at the end of regulation and made it and they covered the point spread, wtfso i wonder how is it that fat lazy vegas punks know more about sports than the rest of us including analysts and sports talk posterswhen they get the lines right which is more often than not it is astonishingly precisehow is it possible? here are some possibilitiesfirst consider what gambling is. its a multi multi billion dollar business with huge profitsother multi billion dollar businesses which use think tanks or heavy research like google, microsoft, and other orgs like NASA or defense dep. have at their core vastly superior and secret technology that we will not see for many years if everso what is the core of gambling odd makers that makes them so successfullresearch and analysis?advanced computer hardware/software used to analyze probability?fortune tellers/spiritual seers/ect?[Edited on May 30, 2008 at 7:49 PM. Reason : .]
5/30/2008 7:26:14 PM
sports almanac?
5/30/2008 7:32:49 PM
^oh snap, i seriously forgot about thatif time travel was possible im sure that someone would come back and start betting, easiest way to make money
5/30/2008 7:41:03 PM
i believe that is the plot to back to the future II.
5/30/2008 7:41:57 PM
^dddurrrrr
5/30/2008 7:43:01 PM
5/30/2008 7:44:10 PM
^thanks for that completely irrelevant picture
5/30/2008 7:45:32 PM
it's almost relevant.almost.
5/30/2008 7:52:44 PM
5/30/2008 8:52:22 PM
Usually experienced handicappers will come up with the lines and then submit them to a superior who compares the submitted line to what they would recommend. If the lines are off much they enter deeper discussions and further analysis before coming up with a trial line.They usually have a book of a few heavy bettors who they will call with this trial line. They'll monitor the action they receive and potentially adjust the lines a little before releasing them to the general public.It's not an exact science or anything its just with 1000's of games to draw from you get the idea of what a "fair" line will be and in the long run the "fair" line is an accurate enough predictor that a decent percentage of games fall around that number.
5/31/2008 2:54:02 PM
It's not like the lines are 100 percent on all the time.Off the top of my head, for example, what was the OSU/Fla nat'l title line?[Edited on May 31, 2008 at 2:57 PM. Reason : k]
5/31/2008 2:56:42 PM
5/31/2008 3:33:03 PM
The key point to remember about odds-making is it's not about trying to figure out the final score, it's trying to make the money bet on each side of a line 50/50, cause the bookie/house is guaranteed to make money when the money bet on each side is 50/50. And for that you have to take into account size of fanbase of each team, the normal amount of money bet on each team, and also a team's history against the spread.There are of course some times where if the bookmaker thinks the public is bandwagoning and dead wrong on the outcome of a game, they won't adjust the line and just take the big money.[Edited on May 31, 2008 at 7:26 PM. Reason : /]
5/31/2008 7:23:03 PM
Because they chase rabbits around during the hot Florida summers. Does wonders for agility and quickness.
6/3/2008 12:10:07 PM
barefooted when the fields are on firei read that story sometime back, shit was awesome
6/3/2008 12:16:36 PM
lmao at the irrelevant picture
6/3/2008 12:21:00 PM
When you get down to it there are basically 10 guys in a room. The 'leader' says a line and the people raise their hand according to which side they would bet. The line is modified until there are 5 on each side. Now you have a line.
6/3/2008 12:37:47 PM
if I see a staggering lean in the public betting trend i'll bet against them the majority of the timeit seems the bookies know something we don't on those too good to be true lines
6/3/2008 12:38:18 PM