I figure if the R's are afriad that obama will win they and israel and others will try to push for a war before bush is out.also you would think iran would just chill until this occurs but
5/7/2008 1:30:17 PM
apparently the us and russia signed some nuke deal yesterday...its a reversal of us policy and they experts are saying it shows that the US now thinks russia is on its side when it comes to the iran nuclear situation
5/7/2008 1:38:49 PM
5/7/2008 1:43:04 PM
RAWR RAWR RAWRKING DOUCHEBAGE JR HEREREPUBLICAN ARE WARMONGERING MURDERERSRAWR
5/7/2008 1:48:41 PM
i wouldnt call them warmongering murderers but they are a bit hawkish
5/7/2008 1:56:06 PM
there are hawks and there are those who aren't afraid to pull the trigger. i prefer the latter when necessary
5/7/2008 1:59:16 PM
just leave the military up to the republicans guys, you can have the oval office for a couple years here and do your damage to the health care and education systems, but let's keep the hippies away from that which keeps us all safe.k? we cool wit dat? thx
5/7/2008 2:02:37 PM
I dunno, dropping a 'weed bomb' which makes a nation stoned and too apathetic to fight a war is much better than wiping half of their population out in my opinion.
5/7/2008 2:03:45 PM
Any sort of military action against Iran would require a major change in the situation on their end -- eg, a successful nuclear bomb test.
5/7/2008 2:09:01 PM
well at some point our stance needs to change...iran just keeps enriching...
5/7/2008 2:12:48 PM
yeah, a 3 front war with an already overstretched military isn't a bad idea at all....D-R-A-F-T anyone?
5/7/2008 2:46:11 PM
Cause we FUCKED the middle east and gave birth to a deamon
5/7/2008 2:47:17 PM
5/7/2008 2:55:28 PM
5/7/2008 3:13:32 PM
omg, I will never be safe if we establish diplomatic ties with Iran. I will be much safer with Bush or Hillary threatening them with nuclear warfare.
5/7/2008 3:23:44 PM
5/7/2008 4:20:23 PM
^yeah, but the country's prospects look bleek with or without war, i think war would be for longterm economic stability and is bush's version of an energy policy
5/7/2008 5:27:32 PM
i thought our main military action toward iran was gonna be tactical nuclear strikes
5/7/2008 5:28:37 PM
Do you really think there that a comparison of the country going to war with Iran and not going to war with Iran is similar at all? Doing this would dramatically alter the future of the country in a negative way. Saying something like, "Well, we're already fucked so we might as well invade this country." is completely retarded. We might not be entering a period of American prosperity but we'll certainly be better off by not invading Iran.If Bush's long term energy policy is to procure more oil then it has already failed miserably.
5/7/2008 5:32:00 PM
^if oil prices continue to rise and we have to compete for oil with asia then having an iran as a supplier would be a huge benefit,maybe worth the cost of war, who knows, im just speculating
5/7/2008 5:39:00 PM
Oh you mean kinda like how Iraq supplies us with all that oil? Wait...Just cuz they have it doesn't mean we would get it cheap if we take them over. If we went over there and just decided to take it they would overrun the oil fields with suicide bombers and we wouldn't get shit.
5/7/2008 5:50:39 PM
They could spend the next 4 years talking up the WMDs in Iran, a war would still have HORRIBLE public support. I mean, that credibility of the executive branch for saying a country having WMDs isn't great to begin with, and the entire lip service now is complete crap.I would outright protest a war with Iran.
5/7/2008 5:57:17 PM
why cant we just get the jews to fight iran for us
5/7/2008 6:10:38 PM
oops forgot to mention that the biggest reason that we invaded iraq and why we may invade iranis because both countries were trying to swith their oil trading from using dollars to using euros and also encourage other countries to do the sameif that occurred we'd be in the stone age overnight
5/7/2008 6:29:43 PM
^^ because it's the other way around, yo
5/7/2008 6:32:07 PM
How would that put us in the stone age? I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm just saying I completely don't understand what you're thinking. It's possible you're completely correct.
5/7/2008 6:40:08 PM
because these oil countries use the dollar for trading oil it creates a cycle of petro, goods, and dollars that is very beneficial to the US bankscurrently there are trillions of dollars of oil money sitting in new yorkif they switch currency the cycle would break and appearantly thats very badsearch for "petro dollar blah blah" video onlinehere it ishttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1oPEfa9Lws&eurl=http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=petro%20dollar%20iraq%20war&sourceid=ie7&rls=com.microsoft:en-US&i[Edited on May 7, 2008 at 7:20 PM. Reason : .l]
5/7/2008 7:15:56 PM
wow... i didn't know lafta was a genocidal maniac.
5/7/2008 7:24:38 PM
^haha, so you take my posts as a support for the war, no mani think the whole idea is evilunless you look at it as everyone is out for their survivallike people on an island with nothing to eati in no way think this is moral, its is evil, but i doubt the govt is just gonna sit there and let this country fall apart
5/7/2008 7:40:16 PM
http://news.yahoo.com/nphotos/Jenna-Bush-Crawford2C-Texas-President-Bush-Andrews-AFB2C-Md/ss/events/us/042408jennabush/s:/ap/20080509/ap_on_go_pr_wh/jenna_bush_wedding/im:/080508/480/c97d7314051549a7af567b459ea481e0/;_ylt=AmM31YWGrR.LoJFg7u7vJsYGw_IE#photoViewer=/080501/480/544a332124ec4ee0bc5fea50640418f6
5/9/2008 2:44:42 AM
haha, win
5/9/2008 2:45:32 AM
durka durka durka
5/9/2008 2:47:41 AM
nvm[Edited on May 9, 2008 at 2:57 AM. Reason : late]
5/9/2008 2:57:27 AM
i'll chuck this right here -> "It is generally inadvisable to eject directly over the area you just bombed." - U.S. Air Force Manuallol.
5/9/2008 9:18:40 AM
worst idea ever
5/9/2008 10:35:59 AM
Chuck Norris ejects wherever he wants to though.
5/9/2008 10:37:29 AM
If we go to war with Iran; I am moving to Canada
5/9/2008 12:31:32 PM
here's another one from the same air force manual ->"If you see a bomb technician running, follow him." - USAF ammo manual
5/9/2008 2:20:02 PM
lol
5/9/2008 2:20:25 PM
I totally respect and acknowledge the viewpoints of someone that refers to Republican's as 'R's.'
5/9/2008 3:38:23 PM
5/9/2008 4:05:09 PM
War with Iran: bad idea.
5/9/2008 9:47:54 PM
^ but my politicians say differently. How can this be?
5/9/2008 9:57:12 PM
5/9/2008 10:48:13 PM
don't fuck with iran. just forget about them.got enough problems as it is in the US
5/11/2008 3:03:55 AM
if a dem wins, once the repubs win again they'll prolly invade iran
5/11/2008 3:05:54 AM
haha, i called it, http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1210668683139&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
5/20/2008 8:29:59 AM
There is no way Congress would ever let him do that.
5/20/2008 8:32:21 AM
^Congress is irrelevant. He can just claim that the authorization to use force in Iraq allows an attack on Iran, too. Who's going to stop him?
5/20/2008 10:15:38 AM
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid.LOLHonestly though I think you'd see a pretty swift impeachment if BushCo launched an unauthorized, unprovoked attack on Iran.
5/20/2008 10:18:53 AM