LOLed - laugh out loudedLedOL - laughed out loud thoughts?
3/28/2008 11:57:04 AM
I think you wasted your thread
3/28/2008 11:57:25 AM
i think LOLed looks a lot more intuitively correct
3/28/2008 11:57:27 AM
10/10
3/28/2008 11:57:31 AM
ibStillFuchsia[Edited on March 28, 2008 at 11:58 AM. Reason : -]
3/28/2008 11:57:55 AM
LOLLOLedLOLing
3/28/2008 12:13:59 PM
message_topic.aspx?topic=518457
3/28/2008 12:42:25 PM
Technically, the joining of the intialism LOL and the suffix ed, for example, would necessitate a hyphen. (e.g. LOL-ed). I posit that at least the suffix rule applies and probably the compound-element rule.But since posts on TWW are not intended to be academic offerings--or even formal--one can simply choose LOLed or LedOL. Widespread use and tradition will dictate usage more than any definitive syntactic rules.
3/28/2008 1:07:56 PM
lawld
3/28/2008 1:08:52 PM
lol'd
3/28/2008 1:12:49 PM
^ Apostrophes do show omission or possession. But since the ed suffix is not a stand-alone word, such as what would be seen in a contraction, I wouldn't use the apostrophe in that way.
3/28/2008 1:21:52 PM
loloredlawlered[Edited on March 28, 2008 at 1:22 PM. Reason : l]
3/28/2008 1:22:32 PM
laughed out louded
3/28/2008 1:23:51 PM
Initialisms and acronyms have a life of their own--separate from the words they represent. And a warning: These abbreviations create ambiguity as identical letter groups multiply.Witness the entries from just the first page of LOL from Acronymfinder.com:
3/28/2008 1:43:54 PM
lawled
3/28/2008 2:06:26 PM
lawldlol'dloloredlawleredloledlawled
3/28/2008 2:41:27 PM
Laugh On-Line
3/28/2008 3:51:25 PM
NIFOC
3/28/2008 3:52:47 PM
present tense of FAILhttp://www.thewolfweb.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=520468
3/28/2008 3:52:49 PM
i lol'd
3/28/2008 3:56:00 PM
geLOLt (auf Deutsch)
3/28/2008 3:59:58 PM
lol'ded
3/28/2008 4:21:33 PM
3/28/2008 4:31:13 PM
LedOL looks like come strange new electrical part
3/28/2008 6:17:17 PM
nice
3/28/2008 6:17:45 PM
^^^that's hilarious
3/28/2008 6:49:52 PM