For messing up the word associations thread tww.gunzz says this is chit chat thread :\
2/25/2008 3:23:48 PM
Second.The post and the motion.
2/25/2008 3:26:08 PM
this is chit chat thread
2/25/2008 3:44:43 PM
NO.
2/25/2008 4:23:53 PM
2/25/2008 4:28:11 PM
2/25/2008 5:12:07 PM
i vote suspenders.
2/25/2008 7:54:38 PM
^^ suspend
2/25/2008 7:58:30 PM
Feel the wrath of my sway, bitch!
2/25/2008 7:59:10 PM
2/25/2008 7:59:40 PM
well, she probably doesn't like me now cause of what i said about souls.
2/25/2008 8:00:28 PM
no, there is nothing wrong with believing that animals don't have souls. That's what you think, whether you are right or wrong.]]
2/25/2008 8:12:43 PM
lol what exactly is a "soul"?
2/25/2008 8:13:54 PM
Animals can't have souls because god put them there for us to skin and eat.
2/25/2008 8:14:20 PM
DnL, that is a very good question.You see, in order to decide who has one or not, you have to define what it is first.
2/25/2008 8:14:47 PM
*leaves thread*
2/25/2008 8:15:20 PM
you create a thread and then leave it?
2/25/2008 8:15:52 PM
If something has a soul, then you feel remorse when you slaughter and eat it.THEREFORE animals can't have souls.]
2/25/2008 8:16:06 PM
yeah these are pretty good points...if animals have souls then most people are going to hell
2/25/2008 8:16:55 PM
Maybe it's you who doesn't have a soul.Think about that.
2/25/2008 8:16:59 PM
ridiculous reasoning, wallswikipedia definition: soul
2/25/2008 8:17:56 PM
Thats because there are cyborgs and aliens that have souls.answer this: how many cyborgs and animals do you see in slaughter houses? ]
2/25/2008 8:18:56 PM
2/25/2008 8:19:18 PM
^ yeah i loled too.let me go look up wikipedia's one sentence definition of god.rofl]
2/25/2008 8:19:45 PM
same thing. because it all leads down to this:
2/25/2008 8:23:43 PM
so which one of us is right?i can believe what i want, but i want to know before i go back in the atrium if i'm eating souls or not.[Edited on February 25, 2008 at 8:25 PM. Reason : then again in the atrium i'm probably not. gg]
2/25/2008 8:25:03 PM
amac884 IS THE DECIDING BODY ON MATTERS SUCH AS THESE
2/25/2008 8:25:56 PM
no. you would be eating flesh. The soul would already be gone. Don't turn this in to a vegetarianism argument.
2/25/2008 8:26:42 PM
Yeah, we wouldn't want this thread to get off topic.
2/25/2008 8:27:31 PM
yeah no one with a soul would fuck up the word associations thread tww.
2/25/2008 8:29:53 PM
I doubt puppies have souls.
2/25/2008 8:30:58 PM
rofl nvm.]
2/25/2008 8:32:13 PM
I'm searching google seeing what I can find. The general consensus is yes, some sites seem unsure, and I just found one that straight-out says "no"the question will never be answered. For now, it is just a matter of opinion.
2/25/2008 8:35:55 PM
Did you check wiki?Make sure you check wiki.
2/25/2008 8:37:41 PM
ok, hold on.
2/25/2008 8:38:11 PM
2/25/2008 8:38:14 PM
okay, I don't really see much that says anything about animals as opposed to only humans on wikipedia.
2/25/2008 8:41:10 PM
i changed my mind guys.http://www.dogshavesouls.com/scripture.htmlthis neutral source proves without a doubt that dogs have souls countless times.
2/25/2008 8:42:08 PM
what? clearly that is not a neutral site. and what do the quoted passages mean?
2/25/2008 8:43:02 PM
i don't understand how that site doesn't convince a nonbeliever that puppies have souls.
2/25/2008 8:44:17 PM
FROM WIKI!
2/25/2008 8:44:33 PM
2/25/2008 8:47:22 PM
Let's get 20 people to sign the suspend puppy thread by tomorrow.
2/25/2008 9:04:13 PM
yeah, right.
2/25/2008 9:04:42 PM
1.DiamondAce2.Spontaneous3.Walls14414.Yoshiemaster]
2/25/2008 9:06:08 PM
puppy, you don't seem to have been making many friends lately.
2/25/2008 9:34:52 PM
2/25/2008 11:18:04 PM