http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/music/article3261591.ece
1/28/2008 10:29:20 AM
well ok, 5 minutes later I read this:http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/01/28/downloading.music.ap/index.html
1/28/2008 10:33:42 AM
This is... weird... I wonder what kind of files they are using. I'm just so paranoid of these guys at this point that I wouldn't be surprised if I installed their software and it searched my computer for illegal mp3s then reported back to the RIAA for a lawsuit.
1/28/2008 11:40:47 AM
why would they endorse this if it was truly free? they'd have to be making money somehow
1/28/2008 11:46:15 AM
RTFA, advertising via jukebox on their website
1/28/2008 11:58:24 AM
1/28/2008 11:59:11 AM
here are some more subtle details:http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/01/27/midem_qtrax_launch/
1/28/2008 12:33:19 PM
shit i put up with advertisement banners on torrent sites alreadyi still dont see how the record companies could do anything but lose a ton MORE money on this but fuck em
1/28/2008 12:51:02 PM
The record industry just needs to start paying the talent less and pass the savings onto consumers. If you are going to overpay average talent to produce a cd with 1 decent song on it and charge 15 dollars what do they expect?
1/28/2008 1:11:15 PM
perhaps you misunderstand where most of the money from a cd sale goes.
1/28/2008 1:32:13 PM
yeah ~ 2/3 of that $15 goes to the record labelrecord labels have been fucking over artists since long before consumers started downloading music for free
1/28/2008 1:34:51 PM
I'm perfectly ok with having some advertisements as well as only being able to play files from my PC if they are free. This means I have quick access to check out artists I havent heard of and if I like their stuff then decide on buying their actual cd.
1/28/2008 1:39:45 PM
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,23121891-1702,00.html
1/28/2008 2:22:17 PM
you forgot:
1/28/2008 2:27:24 PM
sounds like ruckus...
1/28/2008 5:20:26 PM