Some review books (Princeton Review) say that 99% of the geometry questions on the GMAT exam will involve circles and triangles. However, the official GMAT review book covers a much broader range (polygons, etc.). Any advice/comments?Thanks!
1/15/2008 10:51:11 AM
Is there really a problem with those two conflicting reports? It's not like you'll study up and nail those triangles, then get hit by a dumptruck when a trapezoid shows up. Know the basics of angles, sides, and geometric terminology and I don't really think you can go wrong.
1/15/2008 11:53:39 AM
Anyone that has taken the exam notice the ratio of triangle/circle probs to other geometry problems?
1/15/2008 1:41:12 PM
Chief - No, but I'd rather concentrate on studying for material that will be tested the most rather than try to memorize properties of stuff that I won't be tested on (or as much).
1/15/2008 1:42:22 PM
i actually dont remember. nothing stood out to me as being used over and over again, but i dont see why the princeton review would just make something like that up. if you're really concerned, take one of the practice GMAT tests you get when you sign up for it and make a note about how often those kinds of questions come up.i think chief's point was that if you understand the basics well enough, it won't mater what kind of geometry "shape" you get.
1/15/2008 1:45:10 PM
^exactly. Normal stuff like polygon's interior angles, basic symmetry, areas or volumes of standard shapes.Hell, I looked to see if they provide basic area and volume equations and I found this. This should help tremendously, if you didn't know them already. They're not gonna throw some crazy-ass calc 3 or diff. eq. shit at you that takes half an hour for one problem.
1/15/2008 5:04:19 PM
My thanks
1/15/2008 5:26:50 PM
"I wanna be a triangle"
1/16/2008 7:17:50 PM