"There are approximately 52,000 species of vertebrates, which include the largest organisms ever to live on the Earth."What's wrong with this statement?
12/17/2007 7:48:24 PM
include(s)?
12/17/2007 7:49:29 PM
not THE EARTHit's THE U
12/17/2007 7:50:44 PM
Last time I checked sequoias don't have vertebrae.
12/17/2007 7:54:34 PM
http://www.infoplease.com/spot/fungus1.htmlthis is fairly cool
12/17/2007 8:00:31 PM
12/17/2007 8:01:18 PM
unless 52k is wildly inaccurate... i don't see the problem with that statement?
12/17/2007 8:02:45 PM
^^^Hmm, interesting.^Seriously? I mean, maybe the largest walking land organism, and largest swimming organism...[Edited on December 17, 2007 at 8:03 PM. Reason : merf]
12/17/2007 8:02:51 PM
Maybe he has a different opinion of what consitutes a living organism.
12/17/2007 8:34:09 PM
At least he did not botch the spelling of organism and imply something more Freudian.
12/17/2007 8:38:50 PM
12/17/2007 8:39:17 PM
ZOMG CATS!
12/17/2007 8:43:47 PM
werent dinosaurs pretty big?
12/17/2007 9:10:51 PM
whales have a spine, right? their pretty fuggin huge
12/17/2007 9:19:23 PM
Blue whales are thought to be the largest animals to have ever lived.[Edited on December 17, 2007 at 9:28 PM. Reason : But sequoias are probably larger, and also that fungus thing.]
12/17/2007 9:26:52 PM
12/17/2007 9:27:30 PM
12/17/2007 9:29:42 PM
no, he's saying that there are trees and shit (which are classified as organisms, but not vertebrate) that are bigger than any vertebrate
12/17/2007 9:30:05 PM
"There are approximately 52,000 species of vertebrates, which includes the largest vertebrate to ever live."
12/17/2007 9:32:45 PM
so whales are huge + are vertebrates = kinda works with the prof's statement because there can't be _that_ many other organisms that large, so it is included as 'one of the largest' because there are so few things bigger...wait wat?
12/17/2007 9:32:54 PM
12/17/2007 9:33:46 PM
you godamned communist heathen
12/17/2007 9:35:22 PM
12/17/2007 9:35:43 PM
Why did twin buttfuckers end up in my thread?
12/17/2007 9:37:53 PM
12/17/2007 9:38:06 PM
this is pilgrimshoes and his brother
12/17/2007 9:42:36 PM
well omarbadu said i cant post it againi figured that'd be fun for at least more than 5 posts
12/17/2007 9:43:30 PM
you're the worst kind of faggot
12/17/2007 9:47:25 PM
nice workif you're going to quote me from the chatterboxthen do it
12/17/2007 9:48:14 PM
loser. you want in. sorry, i reject you.
12/17/2007 9:52:42 PM
that just doesnt even make sense
12/17/2007 9:53:45 PM
like you do? whatever, b.
12/17/2007 9:55:13 PM
Just because someone is a professor or has a PhD/doctorate doesn't really mean they know what they're talking about.
12/17/2007 9:58:55 PM
correction, the fungus that you are talking about........actually is single celled organisms and the colonization of them forms the large fungus which covers all that land, so its not considered one organism........just a bunch of little ones.and so if you want to base your information like thatAspen trees are larger than that because they are a bunch of genetically identical trees linked by one single root, so in a sense, they are the same as the fungus but just measured in different parameters.the great barrier reef though, if you want to think of biggest living thing is the largest because of its size. but thats not genetically identical but neither are sequoias, because just like humans, trees have their own genetic variabilitydepending on how you measure, whether by volume, mass, length, or height....it could be a number of things. the largest animal is the blue whale while the sequoia is the largest living organism by volume and mass[Edited on December 17, 2007 at 10:38 PM. Reason : .]
12/17/2007 10:37:22 PM
send him a response with nothing but a fail pic
12/17/2007 10:46:36 PM
I think that comma is unnecessary
12/17/2007 11:04:55 PM
36,000 sexes?How is this possible?
12/17/2007 11:39:18 PM