old thread is deadI thought it was actually pretty good. Sure it gets by mostly on all the boobs in it but Dane Cook actually gets some funny lines and Jessica Alba was amazing...ly hot! Much much better than that shitty Employee of the Month.I will say the film has a "downer" part like most comedies do towards the end, that's expected.I know most everyone has jumped on the hate Dane Cook train... but in my opinion it's worth a student or matinee ticket.opinions?
9/21/2007 2:40:15 AM
dane cook...the new ryan reynolds
9/21/2007 3:29:18 AM
^thats too much of an insult to ryan reynolds
9/21/2007 12:36:27 PM
What's Up gave it 1 and a half starsme and What's Up are BFF and trust it
9/21/2007 2:02:10 PM
I saw it Wed., and went in expecting a romantic comedy after seeing the previews, but man that movie is raunchy, haha.His buddy (guy from Balls of Fury) is hilarious though.Yeah I'd say 1.5 is probably about right.
9/21/2007 2:49:27 PM
shouldve been calledWe made a movie with two attractive leads and make them fall down and stuff
9/21/2007 2:52:29 PM
Haven't seen this yet, though Dane Cook was great in "Mr. Brooks." That movie, oddly enough, had more laughs than "Employee of the Month."
9/21/2007 2:55:41 PM
dane cook: comedy for people who don't know comedy
9/21/2007 3:08:37 PM
This looks terrible.The only think keeping it afloat is Jessica Alba.
9/21/2007 3:23:53 PM
9/21/2007 4:02:44 PM
Its another stupid movie where the studio puts an attractive actress in a film and hope that she's funny. Of course, she's not funny so they just make her fall down.Sandra Bullock and Julia Roberts film previews taught me one thing: if a woman falls down in the preview then its not going to be worth seeing.
9/21/2007 4:36:21 PM
9/21/2007 6:59:19 PM
9/21/2007 7:16:33 PM
9/21/2007 9:09:39 PM
thought it had several funny parts... but dang it was almost a soft porn... waste of money to me
9/22/2007 4:08:41 AM