Once again in the news for infringing on people's privacy.
6/5/2007 9:53:11 AM
I totally agree with her.
6/5/2007 10:02:27 AM
6/5/2007 10:04:22 AM
I think having a picture of this amount of detail on the web is a little different than 'what you can see while going the speed limit'.She's overreacting a little bit (oh, god, there's a murky picture of my cat!), but I also don't care if streetview were to show that I haven't lined my curtains and they don't hang straight.
6/5/2007 10:08:38 AM
6/5/2007 10:08:39 AM
First, oh no a street view of your house? However will you survive?Second, she lets the New York times print her street address and a photo taken inside her house. ATTENTION WHORE.
6/5/2007 10:13:46 AM
It was taken from a public street. Get over it.
6/5/2007 3:05:41 PM
I still agree with her
6/5/2007 3:08:08 PM
To both of you: it's a public street. Get the fuck over it.
6/5/2007 3:14:22 PM
is it still a public street when I'm standing at someone's apartment window staring in?
6/5/2007 3:15:19 PM
6/5/2007 3:21:01 PM
Those views can be seen from the street. Get curtains.
6/5/2007 3:22:16 PM
6/5/2007 3:30:42 PM
ridiculous, the woman's complaint that is.
6/5/2007 3:41:35 PM
its not like they put a webcam inside her housemaybe i should stand in my front yard and yell at every car that passes by to "stop looking at me!" cause i want privacybuy 5 acres and build a house away from teh road if you want privacyhowever its kind of funny that, to my knowledge, the Street View feature is only available in maybe a few dozen locations anywhere...she happens to be in one
6/5/2007 3:45:41 PM
6/5/2007 3:50:27 PM
I tried this, and it doesn't zoom that far...although I did it with my ex g/fs house and I could see my truck in her driveway. ^^ I was wondering why I didn't see that option for any of the locations I typed in, granted they were all in NC, and they probably don't have that option here yet. [Edited on June 5, 2007 at 4:12 PM. Reason : ^]
6/5/2007 4:07:48 PM
how is a still picture "watching someone"???
6/5/2007 4:12:05 PM
^^yeah again, its a picture that i doubt they would update often...if you havent used the feature its pretty neat...basically a panoramic view of the particular intersection/addressalso now we all know that people might be watching us, so there goes the "without their knowledge" part
6/5/2007 4:49:08 PM
anyone found any hookers in vegas yet?[Edited on June 5, 2007 at 5:37 PM. Reason : http://www.streetviewspotting.com/ has some cool stuff]
6/5/2007 5:34:09 PM
http://www.streetviewspotting.com/mtree/people/in-their-house.html
6/5/2007 6:42:47 PM
a) the pictures are over a year oldb) you have no expectation of privacy in plain view from a street (no matter how close you are to the window)c) Google allows users to request that photos be taken down from the site due to inappropriate or personal informationgoddamn, I wish journalists would layout the whole story and not just the "OMG, they're spying on us"edit: what a goddamn, useless fucking title for this thread. I mean, at least go with "Google's spying on us" or some bullshit[Edited on June 5, 2007 at 6:47 PM. Reason : .]
6/5/2007 6:46:08 PM
lol...she saw that image and thought. "ding! a way to get my 15 minutes of fame"
6/5/2007 6:48:04 PM
6/5/2007 8:00:59 PM
please, if it is public now via google, that means the gov't has been doing it for quite some time, like in the 90s when Clinton released the military's GPS satellite capability to general public use when it had been around since the 70s
6/5/2007 8:59:34 PM