Article:http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/05/30/wmissile130.xml
6/1/2007 6:48:28 AM
i think what our country needs most is a proper war between Russia or China - it will do two things:1) It will remind the pacifists that appeasement never wins2) It will remind the chicken-hawks that war does, actually, suck
6/1/2007 7:46:26 AM
Overcome any planned shield/defense system huh?Thats a pretty bold statement. How are they supposed to know what kind of shield/defense system we'll come up with next.
6/1/2007 7:55:55 AM
hello Rosenbergs
6/1/2007 8:20:23 AM
Seriously, what are they supposed to say? "umm, yeah, we just tested an ICBM that is old technology and will be swiftly destroyed the the american's new missile shield"
6/1/2007 8:51:30 AM
our shields aren't that effective as it is, so it's not that bold.
6/1/2007 10:57:50 AM
Nope. Sorry. We're still more interested in blowing up brown people.
6/1/2007 11:03:22 AM
we just want russias oil
6/1/2007 2:26:35 PM
The Russians just want some attention... I kinda feel sorry for them.
6/1/2007 2:37:52 PM
Well, in reality our missile shield would not be able to stop a russian missile attack anyway; the "threat cloud" of actual warheads plus decoys that are also launched from the missile would easily overwhelm our limited system, so their statement is technically true. However I doubt that this new missile has new technology designed to actually defeat a missile shield, Im pretty sure they are bluffing on that.
6/1/2007 3:16:51 PM
Why do we need to waste billions of dollars in bases in foreign countries like Poland anyway.
6/1/2007 3:31:37 PM
the cold war ostensively revolved around our differing ideologieswithout those it's really just two asshole states staring each other downof course... that is was caused WWI, right?sucks
6/1/2007 3:49:29 PM
I'm still all for children being heads of state.. . . oh wait.[Edited on June 1, 2007 at 4:00 PM. Reason : eh]
6/1/2007 4:00:08 PM
sweet! about damn time.
6/1/2007 4:28:49 PM
We never new, any of us, how close we came...to annihilation, in October, 1962.This was the "height" of what is now referred to as "The Cold War".John F. Kennedy stood up to the Soviet Union.You must remember, the times we are speaking of.In October, 1962.. the world almost came to and end.Do not think.. for a moment, this could not happen again
6/1/2007 8:00:25 PM
man, Kennedy sucked at spelling. 'we never new?'
6/1/2007 10:42:34 PM
ha, we came a lot closer than the Cuban missile crisis. Thanks to the patience of Soviet Generals, there was no WWIII. There were many ( ie a shit load) of false positives on the Launch Detection system that the soviets were using, but thankfully, ever single commander of that base waited for confirmation that a missile actually touched down before firing.
6/1/2007 11:45:23 PM
nuclear launch detected
6/2/2007 8:09:22 AM
Putin is as fucking desparate as Ahmedinejad it seems:http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070602.wputin01/BNStory/International/homehe knows he's on his way out, and that the only thing he can do to retain any kind of domestic political clout is to rattle the sabre against the 'evil empire'.and there's also the way he locked up that oil exec in a Siberia prison, so that he could someday be head of that company. this guy is basically a thug.
6/3/2007 9:36:13 PM
pretty much.... problem is he isn't going after the organized crime so much as he's in their pocket...our 'missile shield' is for the iran's, china's, and n. korea's of the world... guys that at most could lob less than a dozen at us.... not for russia which could launch more than a few dozen simultaneously....plus if we did expand it, the expansion would be obvious....[Edited on June 4, 2007 at 10:13 AM. Reason : s]
6/4/2007 10:11:21 AM
Im not really convinced the missile shield could stop even 2 ICBMs launched with full countermeasures. It damn sure could not stop a russian barrage of missiles
6/4/2007 3:04:32 PM