http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/meast/05/03/iraq.conference.ap/index.htmlSo it was bad when Pelosi did this but now?
5/3/2007 2:18:15 PM
well, the idea is that the executive branch should be making these sorts of decisions.the kicker is though, that the administration knew about pelosi's visit WELL before she took it and didn't say anything.
5/3/2007 2:29:07 PM
5/3/2007 2:29:23 PM
They did know about it for a while, and they did ask her not to go, but she did anyways. There is a distinct difference: Pelosi, as important as she may be, is not a member of the State department nor is she speaking on the behalf of the government since she did not have their approval.If you need a contrast, about a month or so afterwards, another group of Democratic politicians led by Bill Richardson went to North Korea, another country with which we have rocky relations with. He did so with the blessings of the State department and the entire trip was but a blip on the national news radar.
5/3/2007 3:51:13 PM
wrong. they did not try to stop her.she also had members of the state dept with her.
5/3/2007 8:39:56 PM
I don't see the connection between this visit versus Pelosi's visit... Please make sense. Thanks.
5/3/2007 9:28:57 PM
This thread is predictable and stupid.Nice work.
5/3/2007 9:31:26 PM
Did any of you see this link on CBS News?http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/04/iraq/main2760338.shtml
5/4/2007 2:42:31 PM
pelosi doesnt work in the bush cabinet or whatever department rice is in
5/5/2007 2:44:38 AM