First off, i mean no disrespect. this isnt a "why christianity is wrong question" this is me being curious and rather than google id rather read responses from real people and their thoughts. i have never heard a good explanation of this so i will try again. basically as i read the bible in my quest for spiritual enlightenment i keep running into the age old paradox.How is Jesus the son of God and God at the same time? Jesus in the bible is referred to as the son of god, as well as god sacraficing his only son....but christians also proclaim he is lord. and i understand the God in man form thing but if that were the case than why did he cry out on the cross "god has forsaken me", why wouldnt he have known what god knew?this is only directed at christians with real answers, not to the "bible is made up" crowd.
3/27/2007 9:44:28 PM
::hiss::
3/27/2007 9:46:20 PM
I'm pretty much an agnostic by practice/belief though I did go to church/sunday school a dozen or so times when spending the weekend with my grandparents as a kidHowever my main point is that in general, ie Christian, Muslim, Buddhist, etc....no religious text is correct word for word
3/27/2007 9:49:51 PM
obviously, so much has been lost in the countless translations.....but i do think this is a basic point of the religion aside from translationim knda agnostic too, raised jewish but not jewish now. im just trying to expand my quest for spiritual knowledge[Edited on March 27, 2007 at 9:52 PM. Reason : .]
3/27/2007 9:51:59 PM
The holy trinity is there so that Christianity is not a polytheistic pagan religion.
3/27/2007 9:53:17 PM
yeah i have heard that one before too
3/27/2007 9:54:03 PM
Jesus is the human, incarnation of God. He is "fully God and fully man." When he was on the cross, he became the embodiment of sin. That is, he took into himself the sin of all men. By doing so, God "turned away" or "forsook" Christ in that instant because of his hatred for sin. Shortly after having been forsaken, Christ proclaimed "It is accomplished" and then he died.There are a lot of things God hasn't revealed to us, and a lot of things we can't seem to understand. Our minds, our created beings exist in three dimensions (four if you include time). I can grasp things that exist beyond those dimensions. That's my take, and I hope it helps.
3/27/2007 10:07:45 PM
thanks, i appreciate the human approach instea of random goole.wikipedia stuff
3/27/2007 10:15:34 PM
My Irish priest used to relate it to a clover; three petals, one stem.For whatever that's worth
3/27/2007 11:00:20 PM
the trinity is encapsulated in the verse Matthew the thirteenth chapter English Standard Version (ESV)
3/27/2007 11:26:26 PM
It's a throwback from the polytheistic pagan beliefs that Christianity is partially based on.It's like how in Hinduism all the gods they have are really just one god.^ That seems to be like in Deep Space 9 with Odo, and the Great Link is god, but Odo is part of the great link, even when he is out of it, yet he is also his own self.[Edited on March 27, 2007 at 11:30 PM. Reason : ]
3/27/2007 11:27:44 PM
because jesus is magicdon't you have cable?
3/27/2007 11:29:18 PM
you arent going to find "trinity" in the bible. the idea of the holy trinity comes from an interpretation of the new testament. im not saying that its an incorrect interpretation, only that no verse explicitly spells it out. in the new testament paul uses christ, god, and the holy spirit interchangeably. many verses (like those mentioned above) are used to further develop this idea of god in three persons. the verse i used to remember the trinity as a kid was "May the grace of the Lord Jesus, and the love of God, and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit be with you all" (although ive forgotten where its from, paul wrote it somewhere). im not really sure what you are asking, are you asking how physically this can exist? on a side note, lots of people have the same problem you do and thats why we have people like jehova's witnesses who have a much different view of the trinity and christadelphians who dont believe the trinity at all
3/27/2007 11:45:56 PM
The answer lies in the Godhead. [No Christian]
3/28/2007 12:58:53 AM
Part of being omnipotent is being able to defy human logic
3/28/2007 2:22:29 AM
mathman basically answered the question the way I would have. Did his response answer your question?
3/28/2007 7:59:36 AM
I didn't read some of the other responses, but I wanted to add this in case no one else hasn't.At the time of Jesus, it was customary for many Jews to recite passages from Psalms in their daily lives. Be it a psalm of sorrow or one of worship. "My God, my God, why have you forsaken me" actually appears directly in Psalms. It could have been just a reciting of a sorrowful Psalm.I don't think Christ was actually wondering why his father had abandoned him. But, when woeful times came over the people of the time, they would recite poems, often to themselves.
3/28/2007 8:11:40 AM
going out on a limb here, I'd say that in a work of fiction, anything is possible.
3/28/2007 8:31:34 AM
OH MAN YOU ARE SO CLEVER
3/28/2007 8:33:06 AM
Have you ever analyzed a work of fiction for an English class? Even if you believe the Bible to be incorrect and fiction, can you still not analyze it? Why do you have to be such a mindless idiot?OK GUYS, QUIT READING DON QUIXOTE AND MOBY DICK! DIRTYGREEK IS RITE![Edited on March 28, 2007 at 8:34 AM. Reason : .]
3/28/2007 8:34:03 AM
ask God
3/28/2007 8:35:27 AM
3/28/2007 11:55:47 AM
i dont really see how either of those verses are in conflict with what he said. could you extend your explanation a little?
3/28/2007 11:59:19 AM
Those two verses don't apply (this is off topic from the original question, which I answered)I don't buy that God "hated" the sin that was Jesus at the moment he uttered "My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?"The act of the crucifixion was a sacrifice of LOVE not HATE. He was killed so that the sin of mankind can be forgiven over the blood spilled by the one who is sinless.
3/28/2007 12:07:44 PM
I think Abbott's Flatland: A romance of many dimensions does an interesting job of showing how one entity can exist as three distinct beings to a lesser realm. Basically, a 3d person is talking to a being in a 2d universe (Flatland). He pokes his finger into the plan and miraculously appears before the Flatlander as a circle. He then pokes two other fingers into the plan, showing up as 3 different circles in Flatland yet he is one entity in his own dimension. A Flatlander is unable to understand height or what it means to look up because of the limits to his existence in the second dimension.
3/28/2007 12:18:46 PM
I think the water analogy is much easierICEWATERSTEAMAll are H20, yet all are different and display different characteristics.
3/28/2007 12:20:28 PM
^or any other molecule as well, although the overall temp range required to sublimate a solid would be greater!
3/28/2007 12:28:32 PM
The water analogy accounts for different states but does nothing for explaining existence of three different entities that are in fact one entity... An iceberg and a glass of water are different states but not the same H20.
3/28/2007 1:02:33 PM
I didn't say it was perfect. If it were, it would no longer be an analogy and would thus exist as the Holy Trinity itself.
3/28/2007 1:21:58 PM
Flatland though leaves nothing special about the number 3, you could just as easily stick 4 or 5 fingers in. And I know omnipotent beings by definition can do anything, but it seems like the 3 in the trinity should be more fundamental than a whim about how many fingers you want to stick in.Atleast the water example maintains 3 as a fundamental element, so they both have good aspects, but neither is sufficient to explain it.
3/28/2007 6:13:21 PM
I guess I can finally speak the truth on the matter.Look, we're not the same person. We're two people. I do have Jesus's password though so I can log onto his username and post under him when I want. He has my password too, so sometimes he posts under my username. Got it?
3/28/2007 6:26:40 PM
[/thread]
3/28/2007 6:27:31 PM
bring back the arian heresy.
3/28/2007 6:29:54 PM
3/28/2007 8:56:21 PM
Water is not a being though... kind of an important aspect. Hell, we shed countless skin cells, hair, nail clippings, etc. but that doesn't mean they represent a separate but equal existence as a being.
3/28/2007 11:18:45 PM
did we ever say they did?
3/29/2007 7:28:54 AM
Dudeagainit's an analogy.Clearly it falls short of being exactly like the thing we are comparing it to.
3/29/2007 8:30:24 AM
Its a mystery.How can God exist outside of time? How can he have created the universe... what was there before there was anything?
3/29/2007 8:54:17 AM
Or herself?
3/29/2007 10:39:21 AM
]
3/29/2007 10:57:00 AM
^^^1. I would instead ask how can you limit God to the human concept of "time" ?2. (Implicitly) Why do you assume that the universe is all that there is ?3. God was there before there was "anything"For the purposes of this comment lets interpret "anything" to mean matter/energy etc.. bound by the laws of physics as we know them or could extend them given more data.
3/31/2007 3:49:24 PM
3/31/2007 4:41:46 PM
^seriously, gtfo.
4/2/2007 10:12:24 AM