didnt see a thread about this on the first page, but if this thread has already been made, lock it.anywaysi just found out last night that they have now started to tow cars parked on trailwood in front of u woods. not only do you get towed, but you also get a parking ticket. i think this is an awful idea and my friend who got towed last night thinks its the cops trying to cut down partying in u woods....
3/18/2007 3:57:53 PM
well parking tickets werent working everyone would just park there anywayso now they get towed.... not a bad solutionits not a good idea to have a lot of cars parked there when people are trying to drink & drive down that road all night. It just increases the chance of hitting someone and getting a senseless DUI
3/18/2007 4:05:10 PM
theres no reason for that area to be a no parking except to cut down on partying, thats the only reasoni mean that lane is really wide, there is plenty of room for parking
3/18/2007 4:13:31 PM
http://www.newsobserver.com/content/news/crime_safety/story_graphics/20070213_parties.pdf
3/18/2007 4:48:44 PM
thats why you dont live at uwoods
3/18/2007 7:16:52 PM
is it posted as "No Parking" ?
3/18/2007 7:21:19 PM
good about time
3/18/2007 7:26:31 PM
just park in melrose/uvillage and walk to woods.
3/18/2007 7:55:09 PM
they tow over there now
3/18/2007 7:56:19 PM
damn. thanks for the heads up.
3/18/2007 7:57:58 PM
that building pictured in the link is my buildingluckily its not the building with 6 or more calls, i think thats MaximaDrvr's building
3/18/2007 8:00:33 PM
Yes, it's a no-parking zone. Amazing that they'd tow people and give you a parking ticket for parking in a no parking zone. Personally I feel that it's warranted. A lot of people park there for parties, then like to walk across the street to their cars, drunk.
3/18/2007 9:04:31 PM
3/18/2007 9:19:35 PM
there are other reasons why a street would be no parking other than width. Such as speed.
3/18/2007 9:20:20 PM
its down to 35 nowthere is no reason why there shouldnt be parkingyou can parallel park on h-boro and it has a fuckton more traffic at the same speed
[Edited on March 18, 2007 at 9:29 PM. Reason : which is more danergous, volume or speed?
3/18/2007 9:26:04 PM