User not logged in - login - register
Home Calendar Books School Tool Photo Gallery Message Boards Users Statistics Advertise Site Info
go to bottom | |
 Message Boards » » RIDICULOUS pro-diversity claptrap from Queen Eliz. Page [1] 2, Next  
salisburyboy
Suspended
9434 Posts
user info
edit post

We've heard it a thousand times...the typical "celebrate diversity" and we'll all live in a multi-racial paradise propaganda we've had shoved down our throats from the Jewish-controlled corporate media and the government-run schools & universities all our lives.

But check out this laughable leftist, pro-multiculturalist drivel. This bullshit just isn't flying anymore. I think the internet and alternatives to the PC/pro-multiculturalist MSM are to blame...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6440039.stm

Quote :
"Queen wants diversity celebrated

Monday, 12 March 2007

The Queen will urge people to celebrate diversity and find it a cause for strength and unity in her annual Commonwealth Day message.

She will call on people to try to respect and understand each other better in a "difficult" world.

The Queen also praises the Commonwealth in her message, saying its shared beliefs and values result in greater security and prosperity.

The speech forms part of the Observance service at Westminster Abbey.

Other speakers will include the Bollywood actress Shilpa Shetty, who won Channel 4's Celebrity Big Brother earlier this year after suffering alleged racism on the show.

Ms Shetty is due to be presented to the Queen at the service.

The theme for this year's Commonwealth Day celebrations is "The Commonwealth - respecting difference, promoting understanding".

By respecting difference and promoting understanding, the future will be a better one for us all

The Queen's Commonwealth Day message

The Queen will focus on the benefits of the Commonwealth, which she sees as being a collection of villages.

"In close-knit communities like these, there are beliefs and values we share and cherish," she will say.

"We know that helping others will lead to greater security and prosperity for ourselves.

"Because we feel this way, our governments and peoples aim to work even more closely together.

"And as individuals, we find that taking part in Commonwealth activities can be inspirational and personally rewarding.

"In today's difficult and sometimes divided world, I believe that it is more important than ever to keep trying to respect and understand each other better."

'Thriving community'

She will also say that people should see each other as being individuals who are special.

"The more we see others in this way, the more we can understand them and their points of view.

"In what we think and say and do, let us as individuals actively seek out the views of others, let us make the best use of what our beliefs and history teach us.

"Let us have open minds and hearts and let us, like the Commonwealth, find our diversity a cause for celebration and a source for strength and unity."

The speech concludes: "This is a thought worth bearing in mind as we gather on Commonwealth Day. We are a thriving community, we value our past, we make the most of our present and we are working together to build our future.

"By respecting difference and promoting understanding, the future will be a better one for us all.""


How can anyone even say that crap anymore with a straight face? What an absolute fucking JOKE. Forcible integration of vastly different races, cultures, and religions leads to "strength" and "unity"???

Ethnic Britons are about fed up with massive non-white immigration to the U.K. I guess this is the Jewish establishment's idea of effective propaganda to promote the multi-racial agenda and continued massive non-white immigration to England.

3/14/2007 2:50:07 PM

State409c
Suspended
19558 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
""So, salisburyboy, whats your rationale for ignoring my response?

You ignored it completely so that you could reply to something else by cutting and pasting something that you have already cut and pasted dozens of times.""



You ignored it completely so that you could reply to something else by cutting and pasting something that you have already cut and pasted dozens of times."[/quote]
Quote :
""So, salisburyboy, whats your rationale for ignoring my response?

You ignored it completely so that you could reply to something else by cutting and pasting something that you have already cut and pasted dozens of times.""

Quote :
""So, salisburyboy, whats your rationale for ignoring my response?

You ignored it completely so that you could reply to something else by cutting and pasting something that you have already cut and pasted dozens of times.""

Quote :
""So, salisburyboy, whats your rationale for ignoring my response?

You ignored it completely so that you could reply to something else by cutting and pasting something that you have already cut and pasted dozens of times.""

Quote :
""So, salisburyboy, whats your rationale for ignoring my response?

You ignored it completely so that you could reply to something else by cutting and pasting something that you have already cut and pasted dozens of times.""

Quote :
""So, salisburyboy, whats your rationale for ignoring my response?

You ignored it completely so that you could reply to something else by cutting and pasting something that you have already cut and pasted dozens of times.""



[Edited on March 14, 2007 at 2:54 PM. Reason : [quote]"So, salisburyboy, whats your rationale for ignoring my response?]

3/14/2007 2:53:25 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148446 Posts
user info
edit post

salisburyboy how do you deduce anything about forcible integration based on what you posted? sounds to me like some lame politically correct speech...so what...and why would the "Jewish-controlled corporate media" want to push what you're claiming? Does the MSM really want integration with Muslims?

what exactly in that passage mentions anything about anyone being forced to do anything?

3/14/2007 2:57:07 PM

salisburyboy
Suspended
9434 Posts
user info
edit post

"Celebrate diversity people! Hold a diversity party! It will bring us stength and unity, as well as security and prosperity! Diversity brings ALL GOOD THINGS!! It makes us all richer! And even protects us from al Kaida! So cherish diveristy!! Celebrate it!

DIVERSITY IS SOOOO WONDERFUL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

3/14/2007 2:59:51 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148446 Posts
user info
edit post

what exactly in that passage mentions anything about anyone being forced to do anything?

"Celebrate isolationism people! Hold a KKK rally or a Black Panther party! Nothing good can be gained by diversity! All people should be segregated! Closing off your lives to anyone not like you is great!!!

THE KKK AND NATION OF ISLAM ARE SOOOOO WONDERFUL!!!!!!!!!!
"

3/14/2007 3:00:21 PM

salisburyboy
Suspended
9434 Posts
user info
edit post

Anyone with half a brain can see that the white western nations are being forced to accept massive non-white immigration into their lands. ~95%+ of the indigenous populations don't want it, but their hijacked and controlled governments force it upon them.

3/14/2007 3:01:48 PM

State409c
Suspended
19558 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Anyone with half a brain can see that the white western nations are being forced to accept massive non-white immigration into their lands."


Is this a problem? I'd love to see more Brazillian and hot Indian chicas walking around this piece!

3/14/2007 3:04:23 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148446 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"~95%+ of the indigenous populations"


indigenous = native american indians? they're probably pissed about all the non-white immigration being forced on them

^yeah that too

3/14/2007 3:04:35 PM

salisburyboy
Suspended
9434 Posts
user info
edit post

Question....if this "diversity" (ie, more non-whites in white countries) is such a great, magnificent, and all-wonderful thing, why do we have to be TOLD to celebrate it???

3/14/2007 3:06:06 PM

State409c
Suspended
19558 Posts
user info
edit post

No one has told me to celebrate anything.

Last I checked, I don't live in the UK.

Furthermore,

If fathers are so great, why do we have to be told to celebrate that

If mothers are so great, why do we have to be told to celebrate that

If veterans are so great, why do we have to be told to celebrate that

If 8 lb 6 oz baby jesus is so great, why do we have to be told to celebrate that

If the earth is so great, why do we have to be told to celebrate that





[Edited on March 14, 2007 at 3:12 PM. Reason : e]

3/14/2007 3:08:50 PM

salisburyboy
Suspended
9434 Posts
user info
edit post

“Diversity” always means fewer whites and more non-whites into formerly majority or all white countries/areas.

Why don't non-white countries need "diversity"?? For example, doesn't Japan need to import tens of millions of...say...black Africans to increase it's diversity? And wouldn't it be a good idea for Mexico, for instance, to import tens of millions of Chinese to increase it's diversity??

But no....only the white nations need to be invaded and settled by non-indigenous populations.

3/14/2007 3:12:55 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148446 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"ie, more non-whites in white countries"


i think you forgot to comment on the indigenous people (NATIVE AMERICAN INDIANS) when you keep referring to "white countries"

you may want to go back and touch on that subject since you keep ignoring it

Quote :
"only the white nations need to be invaded and settled by non-indigenous populations.
"


i'm glad us native whites fought off the native american invasion back in the 15th and 16th century

[Edited on March 14, 2007 at 3:14 PM. Reason : .]

3/14/2007 3:13:38 PM

RedGuard
All American
5596 Posts
user info
edit post

I think there's a bit of a nuance here though. The Queen isn't simply addressing the United Kingdom, she's addressing the entire Commonwealth of Nations, ie. 53 of the nations that made up the former British Empire and of which at least 16 still recognize Her Majesty as their head of state. In this care, embracing diversity is beneficial as you're trying to get a whole set of nations to continue cooperating as a single economic bloc, not "Ethnic Britons" and their neighbors on that tiny island floating off the coast of France.

3/14/2007 3:15:03 PM

salisburyboy
Suspended
9434 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"i think you forgot to comment on the indigenous people (NATIVE AMERICAN INDIANS) when you keep referring to "white countries""


Isn't this just an evolutionary-based "survival of the fittest world"??

If so, whites have just as much of a right to look out for their collective interests as any other race. And that would include displacing other peoples and conquering their lands.

3/14/2007 3:16:03 PM

State409c
Suspended
19558 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Why don't non-white countries need "diversity"?? For example, doesn't Japan need to import tens of millions of...say...black Africans to increase it's diversity? And wouldn't it be a good idea for Mexico, for instance, to import tens of millions of Chinese to increase it's diversity??

But no....only the white nations need to be invaded and settled by non-indigenous populations."


So is it importing or invading?

Furthermore, you didn't address the idea of bringing hot Brazilian and Indian wimens to our country. Would you not like to see that happen? Are you gay?

3/14/2007 3:16:19 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148446 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Isn't this just an evolutionary-based "survival of the fittest world"??

If so, whites have just as much of a right to look out for their collective interests as any other race. And that would include displacing other peoples and conquering their lands."


then whats the problem with diversity? i mean if the non whites are just more fit to survive?

why cant non-whites conquer white countries' lands? i mean you pretty much just did a complete 180 on your stance

i guess they didnt tell you how to argue against that point in the blog you read to completely misunderstand this article in the first place?

3/14/2007 3:17:28 PM

salisburyboy
Suspended
9434 Posts
user info
edit post

Under the evolutionary "survival of the fittest" model, there is no God or absolutes...and every race is engaged in a struggle for survival.

Now, by that model, it's perfectly acceptable for whites to conquer others' lands and for non-whites to invade and displace whites now. But it's also OK for whites to fight back against this non-white invasion of their lands.

All bets are off in this struggle for survival.

3/14/2007 3:19:47 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148446 Posts
user info
edit post

so............

3/14/2007 3:23:10 PM

salisburyboy
Suspended
9434 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Why don't non-white countries need "diversity"?? For example, doesn't Japan need to import tens of millions of...say...black Africans to increase it's diversity? And wouldn't it be a good idea for Mexico, for instance, to import tens of millions of Chinese to increase it's diversity??"

3/14/2007 3:23:33 PM

State409c
Suspended
19558 Posts
user info
edit post

This is the most moronic shit I have ever heard.


I HAD NO CLUE THE ONLY REASON A PERSON EXISTED IN ANY PLACE THAT ISN'T HIS NATURAL LOCATION WAS FOR DIVERSITY PURPOSES.


Why in the fuck would a bunch of Chinese that work in one shit house sweat shop with shitty living conditions, move to Mexico where they would work in another shit house sweat shop, with shittier living conditions...and not speak Spanish?


Fucking listen to yourself dude. You sound like a god damned clown.

[Edited on March 14, 2007 at 3:26 PM. Reason : a]

3/14/2007 3:24:38 PM

salisburyboy
Suspended
9434 Posts
user info
edit post

you want to know who's really a moron?

anyone who actually believes in the la la land pro-multiculturalist diversity propaganda

3/14/2007 3:25:59 PM

GoldenViper
All American
16056 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Anyone with half a brain can see that the white western nations are being forced to accept massive non-white immigration into their lands. ~95%+ of the indigenous populations don't want it, but their hijacked and controlled governments force it upon them."


That's how it should be. All people should have equal rights, including the ability to live wherever they choose. Borders are artificial.

3/14/2007 3:29:20 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148446 Posts
user info
edit post

you know who else is a moron? anyone who reads a dumb speech by the queen and has their paranoia go into overdrive to try and deduce some type of evil jewish MSM illuminati masonic conspiracy since according to you, nothing in this entire world is staightforward, and everything has some sinister behind-teh-scenes interworkings

3/14/2007 3:29:39 PM

State409c
Suspended
19558 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"you want to know who's really a moron?

anyone who actually believes in the la la land pro-multiculturalist diversity propagandaZionist conspiracy"


This is what you meant to say.

3/14/2007 3:29:47 PM

salisburyboy
Suspended
9434 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"All people should have equal rights, including the ability to live wherever they choose. Borders are artificial."


Great...so now the pro-establishment lemmings and/or shills are openly calling for the end of national sovereignty.

What's next after this? World government?

3/14/2007 3:30:46 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148446 Posts
user info
edit post

I'm certainly not calling for the end to soverignty and I personally think we currently have too much immigration

That said, I have no idea the point you're trying to make since you've been all over the place all thread

Also I STILL fail to see how anything mentioned yet implies ANYTHING mandatory or forcible like you so boldly claimed

Quote :
"What's next after this? World government?"


you claimed a few years ago we would definintely have a world government soon...everybody said you were crazy, and you said "no wait and see!" and obviously we still dont have a world govt

[Edited on March 14, 2007 at 3:42 PM. Reason : .]

3/14/2007 3:34:39 PM

agentlion
All American
13936 Posts
user info
edit post

This is beautiful. TreeTwista10 and State409c uniting together for a common cause.

Brings a tear to my eye (not a sad tear, a "wow, maybe world peace is possible, as long as assholes like salisburyboy aren't allowed to speak" tear)

3/14/2007 3:41:44 PM

salisburyboy
Suspended
9434 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"I'm certainly not calling for the end to soverignty and I personally think we currently have too much immigration"


Good. We seem to agree here. Let's end ALL immigration into the United States. Immigration is a practical issue, and we don't need any more immigration.

Granted, the diveristy/multicult lemmings/followers/shills who believe immigration is some type of quasi-religious issue will scream and holler about how this is "racist", "evil", "bigotted", etc...but tough for them.

3/14/2007 3:42:16 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148446 Posts
user info
edit post

^^lol

^so do you have a problem with all the non-white currently in this country? and i dont just mean mexicans who have come here illegally in the last 10 years...i mean any non-whites

also how come you havent addressed that this is not a non-white country...whites took it from native americans 500 years ago...why shouldnt hispanics take it from us?

nobody knows what you're talking about, including yourself.

[Edited on March 14, 2007 at 3:43 PM. Reason : .]

3/14/2007 3:42:26 PM

salisburyboy
Suspended
9434 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"...why shouldnt hispanics take it from us?"


Quote :
"Under the evolutionary "survival of the fittest" model, there is no God or absolutes...and every race is engaged in a struggle for survival.

Now, by that model, it's perfectly acceptable for whites to conquer others' lands and for non-whites to invade and displace whites now. But it's also OK for whites to fight back against this non-white invasion of their lands.

All bets are off in this struggle for survival."

3/14/2007 3:47:20 PM

GoldenViper
All American
16056 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Great...so now the pro-establishment lemmings and/or shills are openly calling for the end of national sovereignty.

What's next after this? World government?"


That would be ideal, yes. To assure freedom to all, mainly. A United States of Earth. Not the evil, authoritarian world g0v you probably imagine.

Quote :
"Immigration is a practical issue, and we don't need any more immigration."


It's also a matter of human rights. Using for to prevent people from wandering across an arbitrary line is immoral.

[Edited on March 14, 2007 at 3:51 PM. Reason : immoral]

3/14/2007 3:48:46 PM

salisburyboy
Suspended
9434 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"That would be ideal, yes. To assure freedom to all, mainly. A United States of Earth. Not the evil, authoritarian world g0v you probably imagine."


Oh yes. It will be so wonderful and magnificent. Peaches, sugar, and all things nice. Just like how "diversity" (ie, non-white immigration into white countries) is the best thing since sliced bread and "gives us strength, unity, prosperity, and security."

World government will secure our rights, give us peace and prosperity, and make the world a virtual paradise!!!




[Edited on March 14, 2007 at 3:51 PM. Reason : 2]

3/14/2007 3:51:08 PM

GoldenViper
All American
16056 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"World government will secure our rights, give us peace and prosperity, and make the world a virtual paradise!!!"


Hell, it'll be an interplanetary if not interstellar government soon enough.

3/14/2007 3:54:05 PM

salisburyboy
Suspended
9434 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"It's also a matter of human rights. Using for to prevent people from wandering across an arbitrary line is immoral. "


No. It's practical and how humans have lived for thousands of years. People of common race and culture band together to form nations of their own...including the right to determine the ethnic/racial make-up of their nation and exclude foreigners.

People have the right to self-determination, and to form nations of their choosing, and to exclude those they choose from their nations. Foreigners do NOT have the right to invade and occupy a nation.

3/14/2007 4:01:26 PM

GoldenViper
All American
16056 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Foreigners do NOT have the right to invade and occupy a nation."


Not at the moment, but they should have this right.

The appeal to tradition doesn't awe me.

3/14/2007 4:05:33 PM

State409c
Suspended
19558 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"People of common race and culture band together to form nations of their own...including the right to determine the ethnic/racial make-up of their nation and exclude foreigners"


HOW DOES A NATION OF IMMIGRANTS EXCLUDE OTHER IMMIGRANTS?

3/14/2007 4:15:50 PM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148446 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"non-white immigration into white countries"


why do you keep saying this and not ever commenting on the largescale white immigration into this country when it was a NON-white country? how come you dont address my statement about native american indians being here first?

3/14/2007 4:18:20 PM

synchrony7
All American
4462 Posts
user info
edit post

While the racist conspiracy theories are stupid, I do think that the PC circle jerk that is "celebrating diversity" is joke (but come on does anyone really take it seriously?). Few people would argue that Nazism must be embraced, or we must celebrate Scientology just as we do religions with much further influence and much richer histories. Just because something is different doesn't make it bad, but it doesn't necessarily make it good either.

3/14/2007 5:37:58 PM

salisburyboy
Suspended
9434 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"While the racist conspiracy theories are stupid"


And what exactly is so-called "racism"? The recognition of the reality of race? Recognition of the fact that all throughout history, nations have consisted of racially homogeneous populations...and that this is how it should be? Standing up for the collective interests of your own kindred and people? Well, if that's the case, then by God, I guess I'm a racist.

3/15/2007 6:27:33 AM

trikk311
All American
2793 Posts
user info
edit post

Salis, arent you a christian??

3/15/2007 6:49:16 AM

salisburyboy
Suspended
9434 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"Salis, arent you a christian??"


Not "mainstream" false/apostate "Christianity"...more along the lines of Christian Identity.

The mainstream so-called "Christian" churches are wrong doctrinally in many areas...eg, using false translations, books/writings that should not be in the canon of scripture, etc.

3/15/2007 7:20:47 AM

Excoriator
Suspended
10214 Posts
user info
edit post

is that so

3/15/2007 7:26:05 AM

trikk311
All American
2793 Posts
user info
edit post

we have been through this man....

so all of those verses that say to love your neighbor....love your brother...take care of them...they are all wrong? they are all lies? the real versions should say "look out for yourself"?

is that right?? yes or no?

3/15/2007 7:26:05 AM

salisburyboy
Suspended
9434 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"so all of those verses that say to love your neighbor....love your brother"


Those of other races are in no way my "brother." The separate races are NOT related and descended from a common ancestor (as the false churches...and evolutionary theory...teach).

I've been through all this (and related topics) as well...

All "humans" did NOT descend from Adam (or Noah)
http://www.thewolfweb.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=429124

*GOD* is a "racist" and "anti-Semite"
http://www.thewolfweb.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=392028

Paul of Tarsus: False Apostle and Deceiver?
http://www.thewolfweb.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=362707

3/15/2007 7:32:55 AM

trikk311
All American
2793 Posts
user info
edit post

ok

ATTN: EVERYONE READING THIS!!...YOU ALL SAW WHAT JUST HAPPENED....

thats all

3/15/2007 7:33:57 AM

Mr. Joshua
Swimfanfan
43948 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"The separate races are NOT related and descended from a common ancestor (as the false churches...and evolutionary theory...teach)."


Your source is the bible. You have yet to either prove that the events in the bible all happened and are accurately represented or to disprove the theory of evolution.

Quote :
"Not "mainstream" false/apostate "Christianity"...more along the lines of Christian Identity."


You have also yet to show that there is anything to support christian identity aside from 19th century pseudoscience.

Quote :
"Ethnic Britons are about fed up with massive non-white immigration to the U.K."


How can you be so sure? The article doesn't say this and you have never left the United States.

Hopefully you're aware that "ethnic Britons" are the bastard children of the Celts, the Angles, the Saxons, the Normans, the Romans, the Norse, the Danes, and various others. Obviously they must hate diversity.

Do you want to get rid of all black people since you want America to be a "white country"?

Quote :
"But it's also OK for whites to fight back against this non-white invasion of their lands."


Their lands? Maybe you should brush up on your early American history.

Quote :
"It's practical and how humans have lived for thousands of years. People of common race and culture band together to form nations of their own."


World history is full of exceptions to the rule that you just made up. Please go read a book.

Quote :
"And what exactly is so-called "racism"? The recognition of the reality of race?"


Its cute how you try to make it sounds so harmless.

In this case, racism is your notion that whites are superior and should stand on the backs of all other cultures.

I agree with everyone else. You're all over the place in this thread.

3/15/2007 9:43:24 AM

salisburyboy
Suspended
9434 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"How can you be so sure? The article doesn't say this and you have never left the United States."


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=384167&in_page_id=1770

Quote :
"Most Britons actually support BNP policies

25th April 2006

A majority of people back the British National Party's policies, according to a poll released today.

[...]

It found that 59 per cent of people supported a halt to all further immigration to the UK..."

3/15/2007 11:06:24 AM

30thAnnZ
Suspended
31803 Posts
user info
edit post

59% of all statistics are made up

3/15/2007 11:22:16 AM

TreeTwista10
minisoldr
148446 Posts
user info
edit post

WHY DO YOU CALL THE UNITED STATES A "WHITE COUNTRY" WHEN WHITES STOLE IT FROM NATIVE AMERICAN INDIANS



i'll be glad to annoy you with huge fonts as long as you ignore points i make that completely shoot down your horrible argument

3/15/2007 11:24:12 AM

salisburyboy
Suspended
9434 Posts
user info
edit post

Quote :
"WHY DO YOU CALL THE UNITED STATES A "WHITE COUNTRY" WHEN WHITES STOLE IT FROM NATIVE AMERICAN INDIANS"


Not all of the land was stolen. White settlers actually PURCHASED much of the land that is now the U.S. from the Indians, including Long Island, which was purchased from the Manhanset Indians.

3/15/2007 11:35:14 AM

 Message Boards » The Soap Box » RIDICULOUS pro-diversity claptrap from Queen Eliz. Page [1] 2, Next  
go to top | |
Admin Options : move topic | lock topic

© 2024 by The Wolf Web - All Rights Reserved.
The material located at this site is not endorsed, sponsored or provided by or on behalf of North Carolina State University.
Powered by CrazyWeb v2.39 - our disclaimer.