For MA 225, we are suppose to Grade these examples in the book. If the claim is false, the proof is an F. The claim for this one says "Every real function is continuous at x=0". Looking at the following proof they provided is long and looks bad. But can I clearly state that the claim is false by the fact that an integer over X is not continuous at x=0. Mainly, is 8/x or a/x a real function?
2/13/2007 7:07:06 PM
Yeah, your counterexample is right. Just say the proof they give is unnecessary and can be disproved with the following counterexample., 1/x at x=0.
2/13/2007 7:22:19 PM
go ahead and give that counter example. But, you're going to need to show (by using the definition or appropriate thm.) that your example is indeed not continuous at x=0. Being MA225 probably use the epsilon-delta definition or sequence based definition of cont' fc'n.you could probably find an easier example, e.g. f(x)=0 if x<=0 and f(x)=1 if x>0.[Edited on February 13, 2007 at 7:33 PM. Reason : or whatever]
2/13/2007 7:32:46 PM