10/18/2006 3:55:11 PM
i don't know why he said it.....steele really has no chance of winning up here. pretty stupid if you ask me, but it is the democrats.
10/18/2006 3:57:49 PM
its not exactly as bad as comments made by some, but yes.. the "libs" should go after him also
10/18/2006 3:59:17 PM
yeah, if you really want to get technical, "slavishly" is a valid word to use to describe the way that dems are trying to paint him.....but it wasnt the most appropriate word to use considering steele is black.
10/18/2006 4:01:13 PM
"wishing someone was president in 1947" isn't racist either. But Lott had to step down.
10/18/2006 4:02:53 PM
"Slavish" is most definately just as racist as "Macaca"
10/18/2006 4:02:55 PM
i don't agree (in the context used), but i see where you're coming from. definately stupid regardless.[Edited on October 18, 2006 at 4:07 PM. Reason : df]
10/18/2006 4:06:26 PM
My post in the pussification thread
10/18/2006 4:09:56 PM
White people are so racist. And old people too.
10/18/2006 4:21:40 PM
10/18/2006 4:26:34 PM
well, libs have given robert byrd a free pass for years, why change that course now?
10/18/2006 4:28:08 PM
10/18/2006 4:29:44 PM
people who are long dead?
10/18/2006 4:30:22 PM
wealthy representatives that are long dead? or maybe poor peasants that are long dead?
10/18/2006 4:31:56 PM
so how many more baiting questions are you going to ask after this?
10/18/2006 4:32:37 PM
i just figure wealthy govt people know what slavery is because they were slaveownersdont know what the fuck you are after though, i was refering to state409c's quote
10/18/2006 4:40:36 PM
i didnt read the article untill now and I have to say its hilariousnot as funny as the guy saying philli was a jungle tho.
10/18/2006 4:41:02 PM
10/18/2006 4:42:27 PM
yeah i'm sure its out of the realm of possibility to think that strom thurmond knows what slavery is
10/18/2006 4:43:24 PM
But you didn't answer my question. This debate can't continue unless you do so, because I'm too lazy to do what you dothat isto offer up a question to a question that is completely unrelated to the original question.
10/18/2006 4:55:12 PM
wait a minute...remember Trent Lott?? how are you guys not outraged by this?? why shouldnt this guy be forced to retire??he is a clearly a racist...do you think its a coincidence that he used that term when his opponent was black??...heck no...i mean...no one else uses that term...kinda ironic that this guy would make it when his oopponent is a black guy[Edited on October 18, 2006 at 6:22 PM. Reason : asdf]
10/18/2006 6:21:50 PM
i love it when republicans/conservatives try to play the race cardit's hilarious...OMG we're the party of lincolnshut the fuck upyou know basic political history, and you know where you stand[Edited on October 18, 2006 at 6:45 PM. Reason : .]
10/18/2006 6:43:43 PM
^I don't think thats the issueI think the issue is glass houses and stone throwersbecause one party makes it a point to court the votes of a particular segment of the voting populace by making promises they fail to deliver on because well, they don't give a shit about black people either... unless they are donating moneyIMMA GO VOTE DEMOCRAT BECAUSE THEY CARE ABOUT ME AND MY PEOPLEwhatever idiots... I see years of voting democrat has paid off for you[Edited on October 18, 2006 at 6:59 PM. Reason : ..]
10/18/2006 6:57:03 PM
dudetake the trent lott thingstrom was a segregationist, a blatent racistby saying that things would of been better if thurmond was president, lott is either a racist or a moronnow the party may be changing, but a lot of the people who use to be big deal guys in the party, thurmond and helms for example, where huge racists, and I don't believe them when they said they had a change of heartso its true that politicians need to watch their asses, but conservative have really no right to use race as an issueit's makes them look disingenuous...it's not about courting, it's about the fact that a lot of conservatives are closet raciststhat's itand black people know it[Edited on October 18, 2006 at 7:06 PM. Reason : .]
10/18/2006 7:04:35 PM
When I find out about a democrat that has a noose hanging next to a rebel flag or leaves severed deer heads in black people's mailboxes, then I'll be pissed.
10/18/2006 7:19:36 PM
i really was having a hard time thinking of real contemporary examplesbut jeez
10/18/2006 7:22:55 PM
^^^ you don't get itthere are racists in both parties, one party wants to pretend theirs doesn't have it while at the same time bashing the other party for the same problems they haveBYRD??????wake up and realize that both parties are pieces of shit
10/18/2006 7:27:45 PM
randy: LIBS LIBS LIBS KILL YOU ALL
10/18/2006 8:20:15 PM
If a Republican used "slavishly" to describe a democrat half the people in the soap box would stroke out trying to make the 1st "OMG Republican racist!11!!!" thread.Give it to the dems, they can take irrevelent molehills into mountains with their constant nagging and bitching and moaning.
10/18/2006 9:09:32 PM
there are double standards in political partieswho knew?
10/18/2006 9:22:38 PM
Saying that someone works "slavishly" is racist now? That's bullshit. Why is Steele acting so niggardly?oops
10/18/2006 10:48:06 PM
many of the people in the arena here, you know, were underprivileged anyway, so this is working very well for them.
10/19/2006 1:03:03 AM
It was racist, but not nearly as racist as the Strom thing.About as racist as the Macaca thing.
10/19/2006 3:07:28 AM
This is not racist. The concept of slavery is not racist. The use of that term is not always racist.Let me give you an example:"I slaved in the kitchen all day for you" <~~Not racist"I ran like a slave with a watermelon" <~~~Racist
10/19/2006 7:28:54 AM
That's about as funny as my boss referring to hispanics as 'wetbacks' and then telling me that he wasn't racist.
10/19/2006 7:33:38 AM
10/19/2006 7:36:25 AM
hahaha David Duke's wife started Stormfrontthat dude is a hack.oh and its funny how we make a mountain out of a little hill when this thread is pretty much just conservative bitching about our apparent bitching.[Edited on October 19, 2006 at 9:00 AM. Reason : !!]
10/19/2006 8:59:40 AM
10/19/2006 1:42:31 PM
not trying to be a dick, but I want to see a quote or series of stuff that made you think thatbecause, if it's true he did it intentionally, then it is a bit inexcusable
10/19/2006 1:44:54 PM
10/19/2006 1:50:06 PM
no, i want more than thatif it was said off the cuff at a campaign rally, i can see it being just a bad choice of words
10/19/2006 1:51:30 PM
if its worth anything, i live in maryland and the comments really havent made much of a splash other then the typical 2 minute local news blurb.people on here are making a bigger deal out of it then the people in maryland are.[Edited on October 19, 2006 at 2:01 PM. Reason : d]
10/19/2006 2:00:45 PM
The problem here is that anyone should be able to get away with saying that because it obviously had no racist application in that context, and I think a lot of us can see a Republican getting crucified for saying something of the sort.
10/19/2006 4:47:26 PM
dictionary.comSlavishSynonyms: abject, adulatory, bootlicking*, bowing, compliant, cowering, crawling, cringing, flattering, humble, ingratiating, kowtowing*, mealy-mouthed*, obsequious, parasitic, prostrate, scraping, servile, slavish, sniveling, spineless, submissive, subservient, sycophant, sycophantic
10/19/2006 6:18:45 PM
Just yesterday I called Frederick Douglass a bitch ass punk. Yeah, I said it.[Edited on October 19, 2006 at 7:21 PM. Reason : TWO ESSES]
10/19/2006 6:56:16 PM
^ He married him a white woman. I thought you'd be all over that.
10/19/2006 7:15:31 PM
10/19/2006 7:19:50 PM
Frederick Douglas made 50% of his shit up.
10/19/2006 7:21:20 PM
This was a dumb thing to say, but it really wasn't racist. I'm pretty sure members of all races have been slaves at some point in history.
10/20/2006 6:23:48 PM
this is stupid shit
10/20/2006 6:27:33 PM