This is an article by Pat Forde from early August but its good and some of you around here could use the advice/reminders. I've highlighted the best parts.
9/19/2006 10:19:41 PM
it's not august.
9/19/2006 10:20:17 PM
fuck youFIRE CHUCK
9/20/2006 12:10:32 AM
its true...
9/20/2006 12:15:16 AM
9/20/2006 12:16:42 AM
for RallyDurham:
9/20/2006 12:17:23 AM
lsu=national champs. usc lost
9/20/2006 12:27:53 AM
who exactly did USC lose to?because if i recall correctly, the BCS fucked them out of a championship game birth and they ended up winning their BCS game convincingly enough that the media ranked them #1 at the end of the season allowing them to be CO-CHAMPIONSi could be making it all up though [Edited on September 20, 2006 at 2:00 AM. Reason : asdf]
9/20/2006 1:58:15 AM
USC not only didn't win the NC that year, but they didn't even play for it - making LSU split the title penalizes them for doing what they were supposed to doOnly reason USC was voted #1 in that poll is because Pete Carroll said they were the #1 team after beating Michigan, and most voters made their minds up in that momentLSU could've beaten Oklahoma 200-0 and nothing would have changed[Edited on September 20, 2006 at 2:03 AM. Reason : 0][Edited on September 20, 2006 at 2:03 AM. Reason : 0][Edited on September 20, 2006 at 2:03 AM. Reason : 0]
9/20/2006 2:02:50 AM
im pretty sure they lost to kalifornia
9/20/2006 2:04:13 AM
there were no undefeated teams that season you moronusc was #1 in the polls at the time, but they still ended up 3rd in the BCS standingsget the fuck over it already
9/20/2006 2:07:11 AM
^ It wasn't LSU's fault thatUSC ended up at 3. To attempt to deny them that is foolish at best..Clearly it was all on Oklahoma. I think if you ask most folks who don't feel anything for those three teams, they'd say that USC & LSU were easily 1-2 somehow, and that Oklahoma shoulda been the odd man out.OU lost their two biggest games that season, then to prove just how much of a sham they were, they blew it AGAIN the following season. That's all the more reason why USC should be reverent of LSU's '03 title - both teams have a common enemy!
9/20/2006 2:17:20 AM
i wasn't talking to you, but i agree with most of your second postOU had no business playing in the title game, but the main thing to take away from the debacle is that the BCS CLEARLY fucked up as it has in the past. Saying that USC shouldn't have been co champs is just dumb and typical of USC haters.
9/20/2006 2:21:02 AM
The biggest gripe I hold with the co-champs declaration is that when LSU didn't make it back to the championship game the next season, and USC/OU did, somehow both teams were playing in their second straight title game. When USC put that muddy boot up OU's ass, all'a sudden USC became "repeat" champions. The hype continued to swirl into the 2005 season as they continued to loaf early before coming on strong, and it got to the point where I felt for USC fans because there was no way for them to validate ALL of the hype and attention they were getting from entertainment/sports programming (network). Losing the two-peat three-peat didn't help in that department, and folks started calling THEM a sham.The BCS' existence made everything ugly enough on its own, but sports media made it far worse than it should've been.
9/20/2006 2:34:37 AM
9/20/2006 9:19:46 AM