Congrats on passing up on great QB's in the first then getting Brooks you fucking idiots. Are you really just THAT god damn bad? Your GM should be fired before this game is even over.
9/12/2006 12:47:57 AM
no qb can do well behind that line
9/12/2006 12:49:32 AM
Defense is unimportant in football.see Texans, Houston.
9/12/2006 12:50:21 AM
brooks is good, actually really good but he cant throw when ur lettin 4 people by every down
9/12/2006 12:50:27 AM
It doesnt matter, they HAD to take one. And they didn't Thats how they fucked up. BIG TIME.They passed on Cutler and Leinhart(sp?). You dont do that when you have NO FUCKING QB WORTH A SHIT!!!! [Edited on September 12, 2006 at 12:51 AM. Reason : .]
9/12/2006 12:50:30 AM
no they didntlearn football free agency/drafting then get back to me
9/12/2006 12:51:44 AM
9/12/2006 12:52:16 AM
you are stupid
9/12/2006 12:53:08 AM
9/12/2006 12:53:15 AM
Favre is good he just doesnt have a lineBrooks is the same wayCarr is BY FAR the same way
9/12/2006 12:55:49 AM
Andrew Walter's their guy. Brooks is keeping the seat warm.They likely can't afford to invest in another QB right now.
9/12/2006 12:56:10 AM
first round QB's bust at like a 50% rate, and the Raiders don't have the supporting cast to groom a QB. I wouldn't go so far as to say Brooks is good, he is too dumb for his position really and is very inconsistent. But he's good enough to win some games, just not with this sorry o-line.
9/12/2006 12:56:57 AM
he's good for their position with his mobility compared to Collins, and hes not a bad QB really
9/12/2006 12:58:48 AM
Yea and how do you know if cutler and leinhart are good...i mean tim couch and ryan leaf supposed to be good too right?
9/12/2006 1:00:08 AM
^exactly
9/12/2006 1:01:09 AM
and Jeff George
9/12/2006 1:05:13 AM
attn: Atlanta Falcons!congratulations on paying $500 trillion for a WR playing QB who will never lead you to a championship
9/12/2006 1:05:37 AM
Aaron Brooks is fucking terrible. They cant be much worse! The fact is, when you have NO QB! You take a QB in the first round!! Hell, their situation is SO god damn bad, they brought in fucking Jeff George![Edited on September 12, 2006 at 1:06 AM. Reason : .]
9/12/2006 1:05:56 AM
9/12/2006 1:07:22 AM
then cut him two weeks later?look at the titans, they had no QB after letting mcnair walk, they drafted vince young and he's a second-stringer to kerry collins.
9/12/2006 1:08:29 AM
Its obvious you guys are only trying to troll me. If you would honestly have Brooks over Cutler or Leinhart you are complete morons. Obviously Brooks is blowing ass. Just look at all of his years in NO for the most part, and look at tonight. Randy Moss isn't even a factor because he has nobody to throw to him. Thats why the score is 27-0.
9/12/2006 1:09:46 AM
what a bullshit garbage pussy move by Oakland if they kick this
9/12/2006 1:09:59 AM
bingo
9/12/2006 1:10:19 AM
this argument is really pointlessany qb they would have drafted would be riding the bench this year anyway
9/12/2006 1:10:47 AM
THATS NOT THE FUCKING POINT. The point is....THEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBTHEY HAD NO QB AND DIDNT DRAFT A QBANd then they sign Aaron Brooks.[Edited on September 12, 2006 at 1:12 AM. Reason : .]
9/12/2006 1:12:12 AM
9/12/2006 1:12:29 AM
this guy really is mentally handicappedi'm done here
9/12/2006 1:13:03 AM
^^ because it would just be to keep from being shutout, trying to make it seem like they didnt get their asses stomped. They did the right thing. Took their ass kicking
9/12/2006 1:14:18 AM
Ok, so lets look at this....A complete shit team...the Raiders...with NO QB to speak of, don't draft a QB in the first round when Cutler and Leinhart are both available. You have one of the best WRs in the league, but you have nobody to throw to him. You then sign Aaron Brooks to a contract. The same rogers who has had at best, an average career in the NFL, and is practically the laughing stock of the NFL as far as QBs go. So please do tell me how I am so out of line here. [Edited on September 12, 2006 at 1:16 AM. Reason : .]
9/12/2006 1:14:55 AM
brooks not rogers
9/12/2006 1:15:26 AM
aaron rodgers, huh?point, set, match, ernie
9/12/2006 1:15:37 AM
^^God damnit, twice tonight. Oh well, the Charges still won man! It doesnt even matter. The Raiders are complete shit and should have drafted a QB to build around. Not sign a bullshit never was. End of story.[Edited on September 12, 2006 at 1:18 AM. Reason : .]
9/12/2006 1:16:42 AM
9/12/2006 1:17:31 AM
why draft leinart or cutler when you don't know what you're gettingmaybe the raiders people talked to their agents beforehand and realize a deal wouldn't get donethere are a million factors at play herewho knows what the raiders were thinkingregardless, a decent qb would not solve their problems
9/12/2006 1:18:19 AM
It doesnt even matter. The Raiders are complete shit and should have drafted a QB to build around. Not sign a bullshit never was. End of story.^why sign Brooks when you know you are getting shit?? Atleast with Leinhart and Cutler you have hope. With Brooks, you know you are gonna lose.[Edited on September 12, 2006 at 1:19 AM. Reason : .]
9/12/2006 1:18:28 AM
you are stubborn arent youeither that or just dumb or a troll[Edited on September 12, 2006 at 1:19 AM. Reason : d]
9/12/2006 1:19:15 AM
lol, its not just me. Pretty much every sports writer in the nation has laughed at them signing Brooks. You can't argue with shit. And thats what Brooks is.You are only trying to troll, and I see that now. So argue with yourselves over this. If you would really like to have Brooks over Leinhart or Cutler, then awesome, you must like losing teams. [Edited on September 12, 2006 at 1:21 AM. Reason : .]
9/12/2006 1:20:02 AM
9/12/2006 1:20:34 AM
they deactivated Jerry Porterlol
9/12/2006 2:03:35 AM
9 sacks........that should be a small indicator on what players need to be doing better.although i still dont like brooks.anybody see art shell say a word the entire game? every time the camera was on him he was just tight lipped and looked pissed.
9/12/2006 2:51:09 AM
9/12/2006 11:04:34 AM
All Raiders fans know that as long as Al Davis is alive, Oakland will never take a QB in the first round. The last one we took in the first was Todd Marinovich, and we all know how he turned out. Davis will forever see first round qb's as a risk for this reason. However, I could see us taking Brady Quinn if (when?) we get the number one pick next year, especially if he wins the Heisman. Davis loves Heisman winners.[Edited on September 12, 2006 at 11:20 AM. Reason : ]
9/12/2006 11:19:42 AM
Aaron Brooks sucksThis really shouldn't be that complicated.Yes, their O-Line is horrible but that doesnt mean that brooks isnt horrible too. They are not mutually exclusive things
9/12/2006 11:23:47 AM
did anybody else catch it in the first quarter when the announcers were talking about brooks? it was something along the lines of "this guy is incredibly tough to sack w/ his awareness, quick feet, and smart decisions."Less than 30 secs later the first sack came.......sack lunchs all night longi couldn't stop laughing......"but he's so hard to sack"....the announcers looked like tools
9/12/2006 11:41:53 AM
Brooks is terrible. Did you see how many times last night he just stood in the pocket and held the ball forever and then got sacked. Throw the shit away or use your speed and scramble for a few yards. Physically Brooks is solid, but mentally he is retarded. The Raiders are such a joke that they might as well give Walters a shot to see if he can handle being a starter. They aren't going to win shit with Brooks.
9/12/2006 11:45:15 AM
lol i bet they're glad they got gallery in 2004, he's done so much for them
9/12/2006 11:46:26 AM
"With the first pick in the draft the Oakland Raiders select Brady Quinn, Quarterback, Notre Dame."
9/12/2006 11:52:08 AM
that, also would be a bad move, unless they are gonna trade him for a decent O-line
9/12/2006 12:10:03 PM
9/12/2006 1:55:02 PM
I feel sorry for the "Black Hole". They are probably the craziest fans. Disappointing fans is definately a No NoHey! That reminds me of a near and dear college team ... lol
9/12/2006 3:09:23 PM