http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/5038682.stmDutch alarmed by paedophile groupBy Geraldine CoughlanBBC News, The HagueA political party with a paedophile agenda has been registered in The Netherlands, prompting outrage among many parts of society.The party plans to push for a cut in the legal age for sexual relations to 12 from 16 and for legalisation of child pornography and sex with animals.The Charity, Freedom and Diversity (NVD) party says it promotes freedom of speech and will stand in May elections.MPs say they will ask the government to do something to stop the new party.The Charity, Freedom and Diversity Party says it intends to "shake The Hague awake".TaboosThe party says its aim is to break taboos and fight intolerance. Its members say they want paedophilia to be freely discussed, arguing that a ban just makes children curious.They claim the subject has been a taboo since the 1996 Marc Dutroux child abuse scandal in Belgium.They also want to break the "negative" stigma surrounding paedophilia by getting into parliament.But the NVD says it is not just a one-issue party. It also wants children from the age of 12 to be able to vote; it promotes the legalisation of hard and soft drugs and free train travel for all.
6/1/2006 4:50:05 PM
ibtl
6/1/2006 4:52:30 PM
http://brentroad.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=412153The fact that they're still advocating age restrictions means they're pussy ass pedophiles.They don't have the whole delusional, "FREE THE CHILDREN! LET CHILDREN OF ALL AGES HAVE SEX WITH WHOEVER THEY WANT!" These people just wanna bang 12-year-olds.I'm grasping at commentary here...this party would never have been able to organize without the internet.[Edited on June 1, 2006 at 5:14 PM. Reason : sss]
6/1/2006 5:03:30 PM
those were actually two pretty good points, gg
6/1/2006 5:30:38 PM
6/1/2006 5:32:33 PM
6/1/2006 7:38:16 PM
they aren't gay pedophiles are they?because that's wrong.
6/1/2006 8:56:08 PM
^I actually can't tell if you're being serious or not.
6/1/2006 8:59:17 PM
midget pedophiles are the worst.It's easier for them to blend in.
6/1/2006 10:05:44 PM
6/2/2006 12:36:24 AM
^ As I understand it, the Libertarians want to do away with the unconstitutional parts of the Federal Government. I have not heard them, the political wing not the ideological wing, proclaim a wish to do away with local government, which is responsible for making and enforcing laws such as these.
6/2/2006 8:28:17 AM
^ right. because Libertarians only run unsuccessfully for federal offices. no Libertarians ever run for state or local offices. [Edited on June 3, 2006 at 12:56 AM. Reason : V rolly]
6/3/2006 12:27:19 AM
it doesn't make them any less of a threat to our children.
6/3/2006 12:42:54 AM
does this mean i can bang that Cheyenne chic on MTV now??? yes plz.
6/3/2006 3:30:06 AM
^^^ My point was that libertarians are not anarchists, they still predominantly believe in a night-watchman state making and enforcing laws to protect life, limb, and property. I suspect most would put laws preventing pedophilia in the "limb" category. Or, perhaps, as children are technically our property until age 18, such laws may be protecting "property" in an odd way.
6/3/2006 7:59:11 AM
unless the Dutch are a buncha pervs (here i thought taht was the germans) the only reason i can see for this party is to attach itself to a candidate for the purposes of destorying that candidate's chances at winning...costly, but it'd be effective
6/3/2006 9:57:40 AM
tim is on to something here. What a brilliant way to destroy a candidate, have the Kid-Fucker Party Endorse their candidacy
6/3/2006 11:03:00 AM
6/3/2006 11:19:37 PM
nobody said it was a new tactic...and Bush Sr. didn't get elected to a second term, now did he...
6/5/2006 9:59:57 AM
6/5/2006 2:44:27 PM