I just found this and I found it to be quite interesting. Are there other pharmacies that have opted to not stock the Plan B Morning After pill? target? grocery store pharmacies? even CVS/Eckerds/Kerr Drug? or is Wal-Mart the only one? It seems as if Wal-Mart would be a good choice for a place to carry that pill, since it holds long hours, and as the quote says, is often a person's only option for a pharmacy (not here, but in other locations).
4/12/2006 10:53:49 AM
i think its obvious.the majority of wal-mart's workforce and customer base was once an unplanned pregnancy.they need the white trash workforce to procreate in the backs of cameros to fuel the wal-mart locomotive.[Edited on April 12, 2006 at 10:58 AM. Reason : ]
4/12/2006 10:58:09 AM
Just shop somewhere else for birth control. Do that, and you've saved yourself a pointless trip to Walmart and $texas in court costs.
4/12/2006 10:59:07 AM
uppity whores, wal-mart can sell what they want
4/12/2006 10:59:55 AM
Here's the thing, though. Does this really surprise anybody? Walmart is a "family friendly" company, of course they can't be expected to sell birth control. This is the same company that sells EDITED R-rated movies and, in most cases, refuses to carry M-rated games.
4/12/2006 11:02:39 AM
Can you really force someone to sell a product they don't wish to sell? And it's not like Plan B is their only option for birth control.
4/12/2006 11:04:59 AM
Yes, Wal-Mart is allowed to sell whatever they please... but are they refusing sale because it's a form of "ooops I fucked up" birth control... or because the company that supplies the meds doesn't comply with one of their demands (i.e. all things that are sold through Wal-Mart have to have a building on their site in Arkansas... it's like flippin' Walmart World out there or something... you should hear the Wal-Mart people try to sell it... it's hilarious)Now that I think about it, their clientelle would be highly prone to abusing the ability to access the drug.In all honesty, I don't give a damn whether they carry it or not...[Edited on April 12, 2006 at 11:10 AM. Reason : ^^ good point. The movies & games had completely slipped my mind.]
4/12/2006 11:07:56 AM
the best for would be to not spread your legs
4/12/2006 11:08:08 AM
wait, they sale edited r movies??
4/12/2006 11:08:35 AM
Yes, and they do not disclose it.It's another example of powerful people collaborating to control you.
4/12/2006 11:10:55 AM
The walmart folks who pitch IT department jobs scare me.... They try to make forcing everyone to live in Wally World Alabama sound like an awesome thing and it doesnt matter that they pay way below industry average because it's "so cheap" to live there...There was more "spin" in that presentation than at the ballet.[Edited on April 12, 2006 at 11:15 AM. Reason : .]
4/12/2006 11:14:25 AM
4/12/2006 11:16:49 AM
^I agreeIt's not Wal-Mart's responsibility to make sure every low-income woman has access to Plan B. Even my small town of ~2000 residents has a CVS, so access to a drug store can not be an argument against Wal-Mart.
4/12/2006 11:33:27 AM
4/12/2006 11:36:34 AM
4/12/2006 11:38:32 AM
i mean just think of the snowball effects of that type of a court decision. - let's sue wal-mart for not carrying the brand of tires that i want to buy- let's sue mcd's for not selling spaghetti! i'd be more bothered if they chose not to sell a life or death type of drug like cancer meds. if someone is raped, they can get it at the hospital. this is a "i fucked up" pill for everyone. it is a little different in my mind at least. why should a retail store have to provide this? you should have gone there beforehand and bought condoms. they do sell those btw.
4/12/2006 11:40:54 AM
4/12/2006 11:45:46 AM
Simple economics dictates that if there is demand for a product and Store A does not carry it, but Store B does, then consumers will purchase said product from Store B, while Store A loses out on potential revenue.
4/12/2006 11:47:51 AM
i went to bilo to by condoms once. they were locked up in a glass case at the pharmacy. wtf. I asked and they told me that no one was there with the key at that time. I went to harris teeter.
4/12/2006 11:50:50 AM
4/12/2006 12:02:39 PM
^ a lot of businesses lock up condoms in a case... the fact that they couldn't open it, well, that's another issue all by itself I fully understand and agree that it is Walmart's decision whether or not to sell the drug... and as stated above, it is an "i fucked up" drug for everyone. Plus, the drug itself, as stated here:
4/12/2006 12:06:51 PM
The problem with the "basic" economics Store A and Store B argument above, is in lots of little towns Walmart is the *only* option. They ran out all the mom and pop stores, and there isn't another pharmacy for several hours drive. I've been in areas like this on visits, if that walmart chooses to not stock a medicine, the town doesnt have access to it unless they find a special way to have it shipped in, which obviously wont work in this case.I fully agree a store has a right to stock or not stock what they choose, however that's normal retail, pharmacy stores have extra obligations to their community (or so I should think), and have less rights to choose what to stock and what not to. It's not like they're choosing that they dont wanna stock G-strings, we're talking prescription medicine here. I think that's a *big* difference.There are stores in the USA that wont even stock birth control, even though they're the ONLY option in an area, becuase the pharmacists say it's "immoral". Meaning that hundreds of women in that area have no option becuase someone ELSE decided what should and shouldnt be moral for them. If you're allowed to make a moral choice on one drug - ie plan B. then that opens the door to make a moral choice on any drug. And that pisses me the fuck off. Good for the women who sued.I see no reason why any given pharmacy shouldnt be required to start stocking a medicine if the prescriptions for it are coming in. IT's not like they're not going to make money off it if they're being *asked* to sell it. Nor do I see a problem distinguishing pharmacies from other types of retail stores who , because we're not talking people's health etc, certainly dont need to be subjected to those kinds of rules. Nobody's going to have unwanted kids, die, or get sick because they couldnt have a new halter top.[Edited on April 12, 2006 at 12:17 PM. Reason : .]
4/12/2006 12:13:26 PM
I think the pill would be worth a several hour long drive. What about hospitals, i'm sure they would stock them.
4/12/2006 12:22:05 PM
4/12/2006 12:37:53 PM
4/12/2006 12:50:30 PM
Town governments need to stand up and not allow wal-mart to build. Lots of places have done this already.
4/12/2006 12:53:33 PM
Wal-mart strikes me as hypocritical. They won't sell you vulgar music, but they'll sell you rated R movies. They won't sell you a morning after pill, but they'll hire your pathetic white trash ass after your family kicks you out for being pregnant.
4/12/2006 12:53:55 PM
4/12/2006 1:38:39 PM
i think its obvious.the majority of wal-mart's workforce and customer base was once an unplanned pregnancy.they need the white trash workforce to procreate in the backs of cameros to fuel the wal-mart locomotive.
4/12/2006 2:56:39 PM
^ding ding dingAnd I've never bought a movie there, so I was making an ASSumption on that one.
4/12/2006 3:07:48 PM
well neither have i, I just read the thread
4/12/2006 3:37:02 PM
I agree that normal stores shouldn't be compelled to stock any item they don't want to, but I feel that pharmacies (especially in cases where there little or no choice about which pharmacy to use) have a responisibilty to the public to carry any medication that could reasonably be prescribed.While I feel this is common sense, maybe we need legislation to prevent fucktard fundamentalists from forcing their bullshit morality on the public.
4/12/2006 4:37:38 PM
it's stupid for Wally World not to carry it, and it's stupid to try to force them to.
4/12/2006 4:39:31 PM
Wal-Mart doesn't sell porn. They're violating my 1st amendment rights!
4/12/2006 4:46:43 PM
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
4/12/2006 4:49:55 PM
^ exactly.
4/12/2006 4:57:45 PM
Wal-Mart is not a religion.
4/12/2006 7:02:03 PM
I think this one is much more needed here:
4/12/2006 10:32:32 PM
let me tell you what the immigration probem is really caused by.....http://mediamatters.org/items/200604120014
4/12/2006 10:40:21 PM
4/12/2006 11:09:43 PM
It's because the largest percentage of their shoppers are Mexican...everyone knows Mexicans are devout Catholics and have like 10 babies each......j/k, but yeah, I think it should be Walmart's perogative...they should be able to sell whatever they want to sell.That's just like my husband (at the time boyfriend), who is allergic to latex, went to buy condoms from a drug store near campus and they didn't have latex-free ones. So, if I got pregnant, should I sue the drug store?
4/12/2006 11:25:23 PM
^prerogative
4/12/2006 11:47:17 PM
i know
4/13/2006 12:02:54 AM
4/13/2006 8:11:09 AM
What if it wasn't the morning after pill in question here? What if they quit carrying heart medications for old people or adderall for ADD kids?
4/13/2006 10:00:24 AM
I guess people on those medications would have to go someplace else. It isn't rocket political science.[Edited on April 13, 2006 at 10:06 AM. Reason : -]
4/13/2006 10:05:48 AM
4/13/2006 10:22:24 AM
^So, everyone will be driving to Canada to buy affordable meds in the near future anyway.
4/13/2006 10:27:45 AM
SIMPSONS DID IT!
4/13/2006 10:28:43 AM
4/13/2006 10:37:08 AM