http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060318/ap_on_hi_te/apple_windows_hack;_ylt=AkH_8W0v81Clib8TxpnzpngjtBAF;_ylu=X3oDMTA5aHJvMDdwBHNlYwN5bmNhdA--
3/18/2006 10:21:14 PM
3/18/2006 10:28:20 PM
atleast i'm not the sorriest excuse for a troll
3/18/2006 10:32:16 PM
i forgot how i trolled you exactly, since i've only responded to you once.
3/18/2006 10:53:06 PM
I agree with Cheeze
3/18/2006 10:55:15 PM
3/18/2006 11:02:57 PM
3/18/2006 11:05:34 PM
3/18/2006 11:18:07 PM
http://www.brentroad.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=394624still on the same page even.
3/18/2006 11:22:16 PM
you got to admit thoughits like the best of both worldsit can be on an apple computer but its windows xp
3/18/2006 11:41:52 PM
so whats good about apple, i thought it was its software.and the computers look cooler too
3/18/2006 11:54:03 PM
yeah thats what i'm sayingyou got the cool design of apple computers and the great xp softwarebest of both worlds
3/18/2006 11:54:53 PM
ahahahawtfdid kbbrown3 let drunknloaded use his account or something[Edited on March 19, 2006 at 12:29 AM. Reason : ]
3/19/2006 12:29:14 AM
Apple is okay, but there's no point in dual-booting it with Windows.Linux + Apple or Windows + Apple seems more practical
3/19/2006 12:54:54 AM
the only acceptable dual-boot is OS/2 + BeOS[Edited on March 19, 2006 at 1:23 AM. Reason : .]
3/19/2006 1:23:15 AM
apple is not an operating system
3/19/2006 2:10:47 AM
it took 15 posts for someone to state thisalso,
3/19/2006 11:19:24 AM
^ i had a wtf moment with that quote too.[Edited on March 19, 2006 at 11:22 AM. Reason : i came up with one explanation, but it was a dumb one.]
3/19/2006 11:21:46 AM
Dual-booting is great, but I'm hoping for some sort of good virtualization. Maybe VirtualPC will suddenly become awesome without the hardware emulation layer slowing it down, but I'd like to see something even more transparent.The reasoning behind wanting to run Windows on Apple hardware:I like OS X. I like all the apps on OS X. I can't run Unigraphics or Catia on OS X. Gotta have Windows to do that. And I don't want to buy a whole new machine just to run two or three specific apps.I'm not sure why I'd want to run Linux at all.
3/19/2006 11:57:48 AM
at this point youd be better off running XP native and OSX through the virtual machine
3/19/2006 12:07:08 PM
you could run unigraphics and catia on unix
3/19/2006 1:27:11 PM
gsx server
3/19/2006 1:37:01 PM
3/20/2006 4:22:39 PM
can someone please figure out how to make osx run on a windows machine
3/20/2006 6:02:08 PM
People already hacked OSX to run on Beige Boxes, but unless you have supported hardware, it is pretty pointless. You are better off just buying a new mac and being done with it. OSX on non apple hardware sucks pretty bad.
3/20/2006 7:24:42 PM
3/22/2006 10:32:34 AM
^pretty much true, except if you were the two guys that got the $13K
3/22/2006 10:39:08 AM
3/22/2006 10:41:20 AM
3/22/2006 10:44:47 AM
Explain how either of those combinations are more practical. OS X is already *nix based. Why would you need two?
3/22/2006 10:47:30 AM
Reports out today that the MacBook Pro runs photoshop in XP faster than other comparable XP-based notebooks.http://www.macworld.co.uk/news/index.cfm?NewsID=14171
3/22/2006 6:29:43 PM
my favorite operating system is microsoft!!
3/22/2006 6:36:21 PM
3/23/2006 1:17:26 PM
haha you wish. try again.
3/23/2006 2:27:00 PM
A *nix based system is more "engineer friendly" than any MS OS.
3/23/2006 2:41:30 PM
I wouldn't mind being able to dual-boot XP on my Mac, although I'm just as happy running it in a virtual PC since I don't do games or anything that needs direct hardware support... If it could be faster on the Intel platforms, I'd even be happier.
3/23/2006 2:52:30 PM
3/23/2006 5:07:25 PM
just a Windows fanboy talking out of his ass, I wouldn't pay him any attention
3/23/2006 7:02:14 PM
how-to: http://www.macworld.com/2006/03/firstlooks/xpmini/index.php?lsrc=mwtoprssvia digg]
3/24/2006 10:12:15 AM
3/24/2006 5:55:34 PM
3/24/2006 9:11:02 PM
Please explain how *nix is more friendly to anyone outside of MAYBE ECE/CSC?
3/25/2006 12:29:25 PM