Ok. Quite honestly, being a mod just sucks outright. When I please one person, I displease another person. And when I displease someone, I please another. So I am left with this quandry of what to do.So, this is your chance to affect how I moderate. If you have constructive criticism, then please post it with examples. If you don't have constructive criticism, then please don't post.Examples:1) When I lock a thread, point you to the segment in the site rules to explain why I locked it. Remmber, this is a judgement call.2) I can keep a 'CarZin suspended user list' which indicates the warning the date, the second offense date, the suspension length.3) I won't suspend at all. Everyone can pretty much run around, do what they want, and I'll just remove threads as I see fit. It will pretty much be Chit Chat surrounded by sports talk. I've never wanted that, but apparently some of you do.Like it or not, Sports Talk is different from Chit Chat. There are rarely any rules imposed in Chat Chat, because it is generally a ruleless forum. However, pretty much all the other forums have a specific purpose, and so they all have morphed to have some special rules.So, this is your opportunity.
1/18/2006 4:41:05 PM
quit/thread
1/18/2006 4:46:44 PM
Please dont implement #3, I do get tired of the "Official Game threads" turning into some macho display of who's the most knowitall sports "guru"If they want their own threads for that, that is fine with me. But don't turn real sports talk into a "I know more about sports than you do" arguement.#1 and #2 sound like good ideas if it's not too much trouble. Also is there a way to merge threads? If you see a multiple threads on the same subject can you just merge them into one thread??
1/18/2006 4:47:37 PM
i support CarZin and all of his points. We cant let sports talk turn into Chit Chat
1/18/2006 4:48:30 PM
Make a thread and keep your #2 list there... That way there won't be tons of threads popping up saying 'OMG WHY WAS XYZ SUSPENDED? FUCK CARZIN'
1/18/2006 4:48:51 PM
1/18/2006 4:50:36 PM
in all honesty...i've been on tww for a while nowand i've seen marko make a thread like thisit just doesnt work dude
1/18/2006 4:51:22 PM
did you hear GZ got suspeded?
1/18/2006 4:51:42 PM
this is a fucking stupid idea...refer to second post
1/18/2006 4:51:43 PM
1/18/2006 4:52:00 PM
BTW, I know none of you want this to turn into anything like statefans.com. Neither do I. There is a happy medium, however, between the two.[Edited on January 18, 2006 at 4:53 PM. Reason : .]
1/18/2006 4:53:28 PM
^^ agree with everything he said[Edited on January 18, 2006 at 4:54 PM. Reason : .]
1/18/2006 4:53:41 PM
you gotta admit though. pizza on a bagel is fucking awesome.
1/18/2006 4:53:58 PM
Actually, I think I am going to start moving some of the silly sports threads like "Wow" - "Did you just see that dunk" into Chit Chat. That way you can continue to talk about it, but not clutter up sports talk with something that should be in the game thread.
1/18/2006 4:57:21 PM
1. Suspend users for items other than pissing you off. My beef with you is that you appear to only suspend users when they get under your skin, not when they consistently break "rules."2. Get help. I believe every section of this message board needs more than one active mod. None of you are on all the time. This leads to anarchy when they aren't online and dictatorship when they are. With more mods i believe this would go away. If the right people are chosen to fill the positions then the inconsistencies between moderation styles will be negligible.I'll add more if I think of any.
1/18/2006 4:57:22 PM
1/18/2006 4:59:44 PM
i wish to god they'd make me a mod on twwi mean i'm on probably as much as about anyone
1/18/2006 5:00:56 PM
Well, 'fucking with a mod' is a rule. And its one of those things it is hard for me to look past. If you are damned and determined at pissing me off, then you shouldnt be surprised when it happens. Creating threads about me is breaking at least 2 rules, and possibly more.For example, jayBee posted a thread about wanted to be sports mod. I deleted it. I sent him a warning saying "If you want to waste your time on this, feel free to post it in Feedback, not sports talk". Several hours later, a second thread emerges. I sent him a second warning. I deleted the thread. Then a few hours later, the THIRD thread. And so I finally suspend. And then everyone gets pissy.
1/18/2006 5:01:18 PM
1/18/2006 5:02:29 PM
the "trolling" is all in fun, jackass. "OMG, I am the victim." Whatever.No, the Pizza on a Bagel thread was worthless.keep things as you have them.I have to admit though, the people like john kruk are starting to piss me off, making these threads that support the teams opposite of who local teams are playing. Hell, he doesnt have to be a local fan, but being a Duke fan, then a Bears fan, then a UNC fan is fucking retarded.You should have eliminated him when you had the chance.[Edited on January 18, 2006 at 5:04 PM. Reason : asdf]
1/18/2006 5:03:34 PM
1/18/2006 5:05:29 PM
I'm not upset that you enforce that rule, I'm upset that appears to be the only rule you enforce.
1/18/2006 5:05:39 PM
i agree with panthro
1/18/2006 5:05:43 PM
As stated, I can normally take the name calling. But dont create a thread about it. There are multiple examples of me being called much more than a douche, and not suspending. But as soon as you create a thread about it, then it goes to the next level. I could show you a pretty nice sized inbox of shit comments, and I dont suspend for that.
1/18/2006 5:07:18 PM
drunknloaded is a nice guy! [Edited on January 18, 2006 at 5:12 PM. Reason : asdf]
1/18/2006 5:08:03 PM
1/18/2006 5:08:20 PM
1/18/2006 5:10:58 PM
when tww goes serious
1/18/2006 5:11:05 PM
i remember i made a golf thread when i had like 400 postsit got 2 pages and was really good
1/18/2006 5:11:53 PM
1/18/2006 5:12:26 PM
[Edited on January 18, 2006 at 5:14 PM. Reason : misread]
1/18/2006 5:13:49 PM
if i submitted a list of names to that crazyj dude and put reasons why to suspend each person do you think he would take it seriously?
1/18/2006 5:14:21 PM
1/18/2006 5:14:26 PM
Like right now...there are 2 threads on that Doyle guy talking smack about NC State...one should be deleted
1/18/2006 5:14:37 PM
so you are protecting yourself? niceyou should welcome Jaybee's help because he's smart and you obviously need itand it would take some of the pressure off youlike weeees said, more than one mod would help
1/18/2006 5:14:54 PM
Maybe Im wrong but didn't someone else make the thread saying JayBee should be mod?
1/18/2006 5:18:20 PM
Nice work Carzinthere are a few more though...even one I created...of course Socrates is a dumbass
1/18/2006 5:19:04 PM
Well, unfortunately, the best way of making the case for me to ask CrazyJ to appoint a comoderator is not by you being the type of person who asks for a suspension. Its kinda hard to be a moderator, and suspend people, when you couldnt even follow the rules yourself. If I chose a comoderator, it will be someone that hasnt been suspended, or done everything they can to piss me off.
1/18/2006 5:19:31 PM
1/18/2006 5:20:41 PM
maybe it's time to admit you are not the best at this and realize that is why Jaybee caused trouble to begin withand you are the one who suspended him right? mostly because of your ego? and what do you mean by "if i choose a comoderator"....is it really your choice? does tww belong to you?oh and you double posted...SUSPEND!
1/18/2006 5:24:05 PM
I think I'm just fine at this. I am coming to you for suggestions. And although it is not solely my choice to ask for a co-moderator, it would probably happen if I ask. Problem is that no one likes a moderator. I dont think I know of a board that exists where people don't bitch about the moderator. The only problem with tww is how 1 person out of 1000 can create a big stink.
1/18/2006 5:27:32 PM
that's cool, i can see you have no intention to seriously evaluate your own effectiveness and make real changesi'll just continue to pretend sports talk doesn't existsorry for wasting our time
1/18/2006 5:29:54 PM
^^^^i was going to say the same thing, i thought jaybee only made one, meh
1/18/2006 5:31:16 PM
^^suit yourself. This is pretty much a peer review, and I'm not going to tell you what changes will be made until this thread runs it course. No one is getting immediate gratification. Just because I refuse to quit doesnt mean Im not self evaluating.[Edited on January 18, 2006 at 5:34 PM. Reason : .]
1/18/2006 5:31:17 PM
my only problemswaiting until the original "when pizza is on a bagel" thread was an established phenomenon to baleet itandnot suspending people who make wagers with their ability to post in sports talk
1/18/2006 5:33:44 PM
another thing i think you have a problem with is you are sometimes very sporadic in that there will be one day where it is highly, tightly moderated and the next there is no moderation. i understand that everyone has a schedule to work around but this job might be more appropriate for some loser w/ nothing better to do than mod sports talk.btw i think you get points for making this thread.not that you care what i think.
1/18/2006 5:34:34 PM
hehe. I just might have to make that a new rule. You'll be entering yourself to a contact with me implicitly when you say things like "If the panthers beat the bears, I'll never post again".
1/18/2006 5:35:32 PM
Well, I am considering the dual moderation more than I have in the past. I do spend a lot of time away from the computer (normally more away time when I'm not at work . That leaves a lot of time for the users to run wild. We'll see.
1/18/2006 5:37:05 PM
1/18/2006 5:37:14 PM