I MEAN, WHEN SOMETHING SIMILAR HAPPENED WITH CLINTON, IT WAS OK

BUT WERE GONNA GO CRAZY AND IMAGINE THAT WE CAN GET RID OF BUSH!

WAAH WAAH WAAH! youre ignoring the whole picture as usual

10/29/2005 5:12:10 PM

Quote :

"I MEAN, WHEN SOMETHING SIMILAR HAPPENED WITH CLINTON, IT WAS OK BUT WERE GONNA GO CRAZY AND IMAGINE THAT WE CAN GET RID OF BUSH!"

1. take the inverse of that
2. read it aloud
3. feel silly

10/29/2005 5:16:01 PM

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

If THABIGL believes this he needs to be removed from society.

what a douche. HAHAHAA

[Edited on October 29, 2005 at 5:28 PM. Reason : +]

10/29/2005 5:28:18 PM

clinton administration had like what, 30 indictments.

10/29/2005 5:32:31 PM

^yep

and suddenly bush is the "criminal"

10/29/2005 5:46:50 PM

i hate it when people use mistakes of the past to justify the stupidity of the present

10/29/2005 5:48:47 PM

Its just as stupid now as it was then.

Republicans can't argue that perjury is no big deal now and not look like hypocrites , because they made a HUGE deal out of it when Clinton did it.

So, uh, enjoy the ride. Karma is a bitch.

[Edited on October 29, 2005 at 5:52 PM. Reason : ehe]

10/29/2005 5:52:09 PM

^^^Who's talking about Bush?

[Edited on October 29, 2005 at 5:52 PM. Reason : .]

10/29/2005 5:52:16 PM

Democrats CAN'T say what a disgrace the 90s witchhunt was, and then turn around and do the same thing. both sides are making a pretty huge deal out of everything.

and yes, karma will be just as much a bitch for the democrats.

10/29/2005 5:58:58 PM

There's an appreciable difference between the two cases.

this case involves matters of national security, and does not directly involve the president.

10/29/2005 6:01:08 PM

^ yes.

Apparently getting head is just as bad as misleading the nation into going into war.

10/29/2005 6:03:06 PM

see?

damn the both of you

10/29/2005 6:16:06 PM

But Libby isn't accused of misleading the nation into going into war. He's accused primarily of not hearing about Valerie Plame from Tim Russert.

So a more accurate comparison would be:

"Apparently getting head is just as bad as not talking to Tim Russert."

I'll leave it to the individual readers to decide whether getting head is better or worse than not talking to Tim Russert.

[Edited on October 29, 2005 at 6:40 PM. Reason : foo]

10/29/2005 6:38:21 PM

Quote :

" Something needs to be said that is a clear message that our rule of law is intact and the standards for perjury and obstruction of justice are not gray. And I think it is most important that we make that statement and that it be on the record for history. I very much worry that with the evidence that we have seen that grand juries across America are going to start asking questions about what is obstruction of justice, what is perjury. And I don’t want there to be any lessening of the standard. Because our system of criminal justice depends on people telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. That is the lynch pin of our criminal justice system and I don’t want it to be faded in any way."

10/29/2005 6:46:04 PM

Quote :

"But Libby isn't accused of misleading the nation into going into war. He's accused primarily of not hearing about Valerie Plame from Tim Russert. So a more accurate comparison would be: "Apparently getting head is just as bad as not talking to Tim Russert." I'll leave it to the individual readers to decide whether getting head is better or worse than not talking to Tim Russert."

If you understood what the motivation might be for "outing" Joe Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame, then you would understand the reasons why Libby might perjur himself and obstruct justice.

[Edited on October 29, 2005 at 6:48 PM. Reason : .]

[Edited on October 29, 2005 at 6:50 PM. Reason : .]

10/29/2005 6:47:48 PM

^

To show the nation that Wilson was just engaged in his own version of cronyism and grandstanding. Yes, I understood that much. Frankly, I think the nation deserved to know it.

And to be entirely honest, I think Plame's outing was primarily his fault -- he used her to take a political safari.

The attitude from you and others is that Wilson is some kind of saint who walked across the sea and discovered some magical Uber-intelligence contradicting the entire case for the war.

In point of fact, Wilson is a left-wing shill who found a convienent opportunity to pony up a PR piece.

[Edited on October 29, 2005 at 7:04 PM. Reason : foo]

10/29/2005 7:03:03 PM

Thanks for proving your lack of understanding.

10/29/2005 7:06:40 PM

^

Sorry, I didn't realize posting endless, out-of-context, internet articles was the epitome of "understanding."

10/29/2005 7:08:52 PM

If Wilson was such a shill, why then did Rove, Libby, etc., have to get so bent out of shape about him? Why not just ignore him?

10/29/2005 7:10:23 PM

Quote :

"Sorry, I didn't realize posting endless, out-of-context, internet articles was the epitome of "understanding.""

Educate yourself, I don't have the time to de-program you.

http://thewolfweb.com/message_topic.aspx?topic=361357

10/29/2005 7:18:12 PM

Quote :

"But Libby isn't accused of misleading the nation into going into war. He's accused primarily of not hearing about Valerie Plame from Tim Russert."

Yes.

That's exactly what it is.

It's not like his conversations with Russert prove something else, or anything crazy like that.

10/29/2005 7:26:37 PM