is back, only online though...

http://www.broadsidemag.com

10/25/2005 1:10:10 PM

I have to disagree with you about the environmental restrictions. If anything, we need more strict standards and enforcement. We need to encourage exploration and development of alternative fuel sources. I'm tired of the smog.

I am about as morally and fiscally conservative as they come, but I don't understand why party-line conservatives have such ridiculous stances on the environment. I've never understood it. We are charged with being good stewards of the land, and we are not upholding that.

10/25/2005 1:27:37 PM

Splat!'s grandaddy's reborn it seems

10/25/2005 3:19:59 PM

There is going to be an information table on Thursday from 8-3 in the Brickyard (as soon as our permit is approved). If you are interested in joining, come by.

10/25/2005 4:35:46 PM

i dont think letting my dog shit on articles i printed out from my computer will work as well

10/25/2005 4:37:35 PM

It would probably work better, computer paper is thicker....

10/25/2005 4:45:15 PM

its not as absorbant
and it didnt cost the broadside anything

10/25/2005 4:52:52 PM

Yeah, we are going to be an online publication for a while... it costs a lot of money to print a few thousand copies...

10/25/2005 7:19:40 PM

Quote :

" There is going to be an information table on Thursday from 8-3 in the Brickyard (as soon as our permit is approved [It was]). If you are interested in joining, come by. "

Just a reminder.

[Edited on October 26, 2005 at 11:13 PM. Reason : ]

10/26/2005 11:12:38 PM

BTTT.

We are going to be having an information meeting 17 November 2005 at 7:00 PM in Harrelson 176 (Thursday). So if you are interested in writing for us, helping us out with our website, or if you have some other talent you think we could use, come to the meeting.

11/16/2005 4:28:40 PM

that is the most god awful logo i have ever seen

EVER

11/16/2005 4:38:27 PM

WTF is it?

Looks like a three year old tried to sketch the belltower and attach sails, then put it beside another sailboat/mountains.

11/17/2005 3:07:41 AM

maybe they were morally opposed to paying liberal artfags to make a decent looking logo.

11/17/2005 3:09:30 AM

^maybe. I'm sorry that no one on here likes the logo.

The December issue is out.

http://www.broadsidemag.com

11/29/2005 7:43:29 PM

go home hippy wingnut

11/29/2005 8:51:03 PM

^^

^ check.

11/30/2005 11:57:32 AM

two more articles finally got put up last night.

12/2/2005 7:00:39 AM

BTW, I'd just like to point at that the design concept of the logo isn't so terrible, but the version shown here and on the website looks like it was drawn by a kindergartener. In a place where your magazine already has trouble gaining credibility, a header that smacks of unprofessionalism doesn't help your cause.

12/2/2005 11:11:38 AM

Quote :

"In a place where your magazine already has trouble gaining credibility, a header that smacks of unprofessionalism doesn't help your cause."

second.

12/3/2005 12:14:02 PM

Rather than discuss the logo... again. Perhaps you folks could, I don't know,read the articles and discuss them? BTW, we know people don’t like the logo, thanks for your input.

12/3/2005 1:16:39 PM

you need to get a new logo. that logo stinks.

12/3/2005 2:45:58 PM

along with the logo, the columns stink too!

[Edited on December 3, 2005 at 3:49 PM. Reason : 45]

12/3/2005 3:47:58 PM

I nominate Carl Harrington for the "Fresh Ideas" award.

12/3/2005 5:05:06 PM