J. D. Power and Associates has released its 2005 report of the top ten most dependable vehicles and the ten least dependable. Below are their lists of 2002 model-year car brands, based on how many problems the original owners have reported over the past three years.Most Dependable1. Lexus2. Porsche3. Lincoln4. Buick5. Cadillac6. Infiniti7. Toyota8. Mercury9. Honda10. AcuraLeast Dependable1. Kia2. Land Rover3. Mini4. Volkswagen5. Isuzu6. Daewoo7. Audi8. Suzuki9. Jeep10. Saab[Edited on August 10, 2005 at 9:34 PM. Reason : ]
8/10/2005 9:34:11 PM
looks about right to me
8/10/2005 9:35:21 PM
bmw should be added to the least dependable list according to consumer reports.
8/10/2005 9:39:57 PM
gay[Edited on August 10, 2005 at 9:52 PM. Reason : ]
8/10/2005 9:51:15 PM
im not retyping the reply i put on nceuro
8/11/2005 12:38:12 AM
I like how ford and gm are ahead of nissan, toyota, and honda
8/11/2005 1:03:08 AM
theyre being paid off..
8/11/2005 1:09:18 AM
not trying to defend one company, but i know more about vws than kias.. it pretty much applies across the board and its hard to say from one model year (the 2005 report is from the 2002 model years). it would be better to take, say, a 5-year average or something.anyway.. what i said on nceuro.
8/11/2005 1:12:05 AM
GM cars have been basically the same (as far as major components) for many years leading up to '02. So as this survey goes I'm sure they did actually have far fewer problems. It is interesting, however, the disparity between Lexus and Toyota. This is probably because toyota has a more diverse product line and hence more room for error.
8/11/2005 1:19:40 AM
im curious why lexus and toyota are separated by 6 slots.
8/11/2005 8:12:34 AM
Lexus and Toyota don't share platforms for everything I would think. Like the LS430 is probably made better than the Corolla obviously. I'd like to see a list of which cars from these makes were least reliable though and how much one or two models affected the ranking of an entire car maker.[Edited on August 11, 2005 at 9:22 AM. Reason : .]
8/11/2005 9:21:51 AM
I hate stupid shit like this.What the survey doesn't tell you is what exactly the people complained about.... using their stupid fucking scale, "burned out blinker fluid" ranks the same severity as "catastrophic engine kanooter-valve failure".They need to break it down into categories (cosmetic, powertrain, suspension, chassis, etc...)
8/11/2005 9:29:56 AM
^ right.. or at least weight the failures based on how long the car is inoperable.
8/11/2005 9:42:14 AM
waitkanooter valveis that real?
8/11/2005 9:43:58 AM
The fact that this is for 2002 cars makes it esentially null & void.
8/11/2005 9:55:11 AM
^ & ^^^ Excellent points. Mike
8/11/2005 10:17:10 AM
8/11/2005 10:22:24 AM
8/11/2005 1:27:30 PM
BMW was NO. 11 on the most dependable list
8/11/2005 1:28:14 PM
consumer reports has it in least dependable cause owners of new bmw's will take it back to the dealership for complaints like "the glove box makes a slight clicking sound if i open it at 54mph around a turn on this one street and the radio is on 91.5" [Edited on August 11, 2005 at 2:26 PM. Reason : if you buy a pos car you are generally more forgiving then if you buy the best]
8/11/2005 2:23:59 PM
lexus? number 1? like hell. our gx 470 has been in the shop 3 times with break and wheel issues in the last 6 months, its under warranty and whatnot, but its still a pain in the ass to break down in the middle of nowhere.
8/11/2005 7:54:47 PM
^wheel issues? I'm very curious what problems you can have with a wheel...i mean there are no moving parts.Seriously, tell me.
8/11/2005 8:29:21 PM