well, i thought i'd address Tayla's comment about my little blank line that i use to end my posts. i just decided to do something to add a bit of individuality, as several other users here have also done. what do yall think about this practice of signing posts? is it overdone or annoying? maybe i should only do it when making a definitive statement, but now when asking a question? i'm curious to know your thoughts, and feel free to discuss your own signatures if you think mine is lame.(and about the line...i dont know why it's blank, you tell me.....and why is it always 6 spaces long? cause my number is 51, but 51 spaces is too long, so 5+1=6.)______
9/25/2001 1:08:02 AM
I have no problem with yours, since it's not a graphic that takes time to download. I wouldn't be too happy with a bunch of elaborate artwork for signatures. That would make some threads just too much.
9/25/2001 1:11:15 AM
uh
9/25/2001 1:12:11 AM
yeah, and i dont like the idea of little graphics for each person on tww eithertoo much time and too unnecessary
9/25/2001 1:12:25 AM
hmmm....maybe i should come up with one....<Fe>Mike
9/25/2001 1:14:00 AM
I don't even really like the non-graphic signatures. Seems kind of redundant considering you've already got your screenname and personalized user status (if you're a premium member) right beside every post.
9/25/2001 1:14:01 AM
9/25/2001 1:14:24 AM
i used to but im way to lazy to do it now
9/25/2001 1:17:45 AM
hmmm mabye ill start again....
9/25/2001 1:18:02 AM
this can be mine.
9/25/2001 1:18:48 AM
Signatures are irritating after the first time. No one has something so clever to share with us we need read it every time they post.
9/25/2001 1:18:50 AM
i think that maybe your line that you have or flutterbys little ((8i8)) are fine...but i think large post signatures could get aggravating and waste a lot of space.
9/25/2001 1:21:53 AM
i always liked Flutterby's symbol...havent seen her much around TWW lately_
9/25/2001 1:24:21 AM
how about if i end mine with this....
9/25/2001 1:26:59 AM
too bad it is so small - it is uspposed to say 'alcohol consumption enforcement'
9/25/2001 1:27:39 AM
9/25/2001 1:33:03 AM
same from car boards.... getting old.. think ill make a new one tomorrow---------------------------------------F-Bod better move before I get traction!
9/25/2001 2:13:53 AM
my signature rules.the_drew
9/25/2001 2:16:20 AM
mine used to be -13
9/25/2001 2:18:40 AM
i do signatures when i feel like it, for a while mine was***resident yuppie***
9/25/2001 3:53:40 AM
-------Her Majestyhehehe
9/25/2001 8:31:31 AM
I am sure you have all seen my signature since I use it in most of my posts.((((JeremY))))
9/25/2001 10:17:36 AM
i need a cool signature...BUT I WOULD PREFER AN ICON UNDER MY NAME!!!!!!!!!!1
9/25/2001 10:20:13 AM
How could you possibly go wrong with something like my signature?-bigginal
9/25/2001 10:58:19 AM
Hi-Bye
9/25/2001 11:20:39 AM
damn it, ASCII art never displays properly on this site[Edited on September 25, 2001 at 7:04 PM. Reason : ]
9/25/2001 7:03:27 PM
There are fixed-width fonts and variable-width fonts. In fixed-width fonts, every character is set to the same width, which allows for nice ASCII art. Variable-width fonts are much more natural, professional typefaces. They're also way easier to read, and that's why the Wolf Web uses them by default.In HTML, you can use the <pre> tag to denote a section of text as being preformatted, which renders it in a fixed-width font.
10/2/2001 8:25:48 PM
Xare: use the [code [/code] crazy tag combo
10/2/2001 8:27:12 PM
click on the "#" button above the posting box to insert the appropriate tags for preformatted text
10/2/2001 8:27:46 PM
Oh yeah, I forgot that not everyone can use HTML here. Oops.
10/2/2001 8:28:32 PM
everybodys signature sucks but mine__________________________________________________________________________
10/2/2001 11:07:04 PM
i think small icons would be best!
10/3/2001 12:34:52 AM
how about this signature?
10/4/2001 2:42:16 AM
no icons.no avatars.no sigs.That is all.
10/4/2001 9:22:32 AM
But seriously fuck Krallum........................................................................................................two
5/23/2013 12:45:16 AM