http://www.wral.com/rucho-health-law-more-harmful-to-us-than-nazis/13220181/
12/16/2013 2:32:07 PM
To be fair, swords weren't/aren't the first weapon of choice for any of those groups.
12/16/2013 2:42:19 PM
The Nazis didn't really do all that much damage. If anything they're responsible for making the United States as powerful as were are today by eliminating European competition.
12/16/2013 2:44:39 PM
veterans of WWII and their families probably don't feel that way.[Edited on December 16, 2013 at 3:13 PM. Reason : ]
12/16/2013 2:49:18 PM
Just wait until a death panel votes to kill you with a sword
12/16/2013 3:07:26 PM
Then the swords of the Nazis, Soviets & terrorists combined...did what?Left us hanging.
12/16/2013 4:15:37 PM
shouldn't it also be "...have done..."?
12/16/2013 4:21:25 PM
LOL the GOP and the Tea Party might want to work on reigning in the crazy. Bob "Frack Me" Rucho is just the latest example. I would like to see him explain this rationale to families of holocaust victims and 9/11 families/surviors. Oh yeah and should be have and not has, and then should be than. [Edited on December 16, 2013 at 7:48 PM. Reason : .]
12/16/2013 7:47:32 PM
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2014/01/14/3161521/north-carolinas-eitc-tax-hike-poor/
1/24/2014 12:55:25 AM
http://www.carolinajournal.com/exclusives/display_exclusive.html?id=10005^ alternate headline - "North Carolina joins the majority of states that do not offer a state-based EITC"
1/24/2014 8:46:40 AM
lol joins the majority?
1/24/2014 10:00:47 AM
Ha, fair point, I stand corrected. I posted while at work and I read that as 15 instead of 25.
1/24/2014 10:30:48 AM
http://www.newsobserver.com/2014/01/24/3561691/nc-lawmakers-try-to-quash-subpoenas.html
1/25/2014 9:06:02 AM
Legislative Immunity and Legislative Privilege may in fact apply here. I find it interesting the N&O failed to include even a single paragraph outlining the basics of immunity and privilege as applied to the General Assembly. Instead, the N&O merely states "They contend..." without confirming or challenging the basis for said contention.I don't see, however, how routine email correspondence will be privileged absent a specific statute that exempts correspondence related to this specific law from the public record. It seems a standard FOIA request would have sufficed to obtain legislator emails.
1/25/2014 10:38:31 AM
USDA issues more warnings to state health agencyhttp://www.wral.com/usda-issues-more-warnings-to-state-health-agency/13326212/
1/25/2014 11:04:24 AM
http://www.wral.com/profanity-laced-recording-of-nc-senator-s-meeting-cited-in-death-of-puppy-mill-bill/13332197/
1/28/2014 9:51:18 AM
I don't have time to do a proper write up right now, and I know that some of you will poo-poo the source, but this is worth a watch. What is happening in our own state is very sad.http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/watch/warnings-ignored-ahead-of-toxic-nc-spill-146553923542
2/11/2014 10:02:18 AM
Unfortunately I think we will see more of this, right a lot are holding off on remediating coal ash until the EPA decides if its a hazardous material or not. One way people dispose of coal ash is by recycling it in concrete, which they won't be able to do if it becomes a hazardous material. No one wants to pay to clean up landfills or a class action lawsuits for houses and roads if its determined to be hazardous, and no one wants to pay to dispose of it as hazardous waste if it can end up just going into regular or Subtitle D landfills. The states that have classified it as hazardous on their own are now going to have much longer and more expensive remediation efforts, its a bit of a Catch-22. I do know that Duke Energy was just hiring engineers/geologists for their in-house remediation branch, so hopefully that means they are ramping-up efforts.
2/11/2014 10:16:22 AM
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/watch/anti-science-nc-leaders-no-laughing-matter-162715715644(this post is not an endorsement for rachel maddow)
2/21/2014 10:35:04 AM
^ In the future can you post additional source material besides video from a single biased source simply to avoid having to parse the partisan rhetoric in order to respond. i.e., I don't want to spend 5 minutes watching a clip from Maddow to determine if there's anything worth responding to (even though I just spent 3.5 minutes responding to this message to say I don't have 5 minutes to watch the video above...).
2/21/2014 11:09:58 AM
nah man, I'm just posting a link that I saw on a MSM site that mentions North Carolina. You knew it was MSNBC and Rachel Maddow, so of course it could have some bias. Watch it if you want to. If you don't, then don't. If you want to post something that isn't biased and that doesn't include partisan rhetoric, feel free to search it out and post it. I'd be interested to see/read it.
2/21/2014 11:36:46 AM
The information in that link just makes a vague reference to NC and anti-science, so it's difficult to determine what the issues are without watching.[Edited on February 21, 2014 at 11:41 AM. Reason : ....]
2/21/2014 11:41:11 AM
If you don't know the issues, you haven't been paying attention.Here's a few other articles from biased sources:http://www.wral.com/denr-gets-defensive-over-duke-deal-coal-ash-spill/13409648/http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/plugged-in/2013/01/08/oil-might-be-a-natural-resource-and-other-things-you-did-not-know/http://www.wral.com/-fracking-foes-turn-to-james-taylor-to-sing-out-against-nc-drilling/13413869/http://www.wral.com/expert-concerns-about-moving-ash-ponds-pure-speculation-/13410831/http://www.wral.com/mccrory-moving-coal-ash-ponds-preferred-option/13409927/[Edited on February 21, 2014 at 11:49 AM. Reason : ]
2/21/2014 11:44:37 AM
Regarding the last 2 links:The reason everyone is hesitant to move coal ash ponds to lined landfills is that the EPA is reviewing coal ash right now and they might decide its a hazardous waste, which will determine what kind of landfill it goes to. If you send it to the less restrictive landfill now, they might have to pay to remediate that landfill later. If they proactively take it to the more restrictive landfill, its a significant cost increase that might not be necessary if EPA decides it can go to the less-restrictive landfill. A hazardous waste determination would also not allow it to be recycled, which some of it currently is. That's the only discussion about moving it to a landfill, anything about it being more dangerous in a landfill is hooey; its a lot easier to move coal ash to a landfill than it is to remove it from a river basin.
2/21/2014 11:59:01 AM
one thing i failed to mention:before anyone starts saying "see, this is the EPA's fault!", the reason this has been delayed is because ALEC has been pushing to make sure that coal ash is not federally regulated and wants to make states responsible, while at the same time making sure states don't add new regulations.
2/21/2014 12:36:14 PM
2/21/2014 12:39:06 PM
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/01/us/coal-ash-spill-reveals-transformation-of-north-carolina-agency.html?_r=3
2/28/2014 4:06:00 PM
I've been out of NC for over 2 years now and have no intention of moving back anytime soon (if at all), but I really hope the state reverses course in the upcoming years. I hate to see such a once-progressive state (for the south ) ridiculed by the rest of the country for their ill-intentioned missteps.
2/28/2014 9:09:08 PM
http://www.macobserver.com/tmo/article/tim-cook-soundly-rejects-politics-of-the-ncppr-suggests-group-sell-apples-sTim Cook smacks down conservative policy think tank a share holder meeting.
3/1/2014 12:53:16 AM
NC?
3/1/2014 10:01:51 AM
So apparently we are going to have another constitutional amendment on the ballot this November.
3/6/2014 4:34:44 PM
no youre right, that's basically the reason
3/6/2014 8:29:19 PM
Never mind. I see it's for criminal trials.[Edited on March 6, 2014 at 8:48 PM. Reason : .]
3/6/2014 8:46:27 PM
I'm sure Newby, et al. are just itching to give a pass to Duke Energy if and when it comes to it. The good thing is that the Feds are involved in untangling this mess before McCrony can sweep it under the rug.
3/6/2014 9:43:46 PM
http://www.wral.com/duke-ceo-ratepayers-will-cover-coal-ash-cleanup/13460600/I can hear Republicans now, "See, we told you that ratepayers would pay for this!!!1 This wouldn't happen if we didn't have those damned environmental regulations!!!1" And yes, this goes in this thread because this whole debacle falls into the lap of the McCrony ex-Duke Power endorsed legislatures.
3/8/2014 5:33:59 PM
Aren't gov't created monopolies wonderful?
3/8/2014 10:47:15 PM
I don't wanna pay either, but I'm still skeptical that they'll be able to pull it off with a blatant rate increase. I kinda wonder if its leverage to do less, Duke will argue to just cap the ponds and leave the ash in place rather than remove the ash because it will keep rates cheaper. That's starting to get into multi-dimensional chess though.But politically it's going to be difficult. There is already the perception of cronyism there, and if you think the media is hammering McCrory hard now, just wait till his Utilities Commision approves ANOTHER rate increase. McCrory has shown himself to be pretty tone deaf so far, but he's not that dumb, right?Add on top of that the "latte-sipping" lawyers that are absolutely circling in the water right now. Every miss step is just under the microscope.Here's the thing though. Technically Duke has a pretty good argument, I think. They claim they will take the costs of the spill cleanup, but ratepayers will cover other pond clean ups. Disposing of waste technically is a cost of generation, it's just that Duke has put those costs off for decades. Just another example of us paying for past mistakes by not fully understanding the long-term costs.
3/9/2014 11:47:07 AM
http://www.wral.com/mamas-don-t-let-your-cowboys-endorse-legislative-candidates/13465088/
3/10/2014 11:14:32 PM
An update on the subpoenas issued to legislators regarding emails related to Voter ID:http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2014/03/27/4799487/federal-court-says-nc-legislators.html#.UzVwK1drv4UI'd guess nothing comes from any of the emails that do get turned over but we should know more on April 7.
3/28/2014 8:57:47 AM
Anyone have an idea as to why, with McCrory as governor and the GOP controlling the General Assembly, there hasn't been more of a push for off-shore drilling in North Carolina?
4/9/2014 11:03:47 AM
^McCrory is the chairman of whatever the inter-state commission is that advocates for offshore drilling. Last I heard they were jumping through the final regulatory hurdles so they could exploring and investigating the deposits.
4/9/2014 11:22:32 AM
As we're seeing with the fracking boondoggle, as long as there's even a hint of a sea cucumber's volume in hydrocarbons contained within the continental shelf, McCrony et. al will do everything they can to get at it no matter the risk to our coastline.
4/9/2014 12:47:16 PM
http://www.wral.com/reinstatement-of-jordan-lake-pollution-controls-urged/13571886/
4/17/2014 1:51:18 PM
I know it's just pandering, but why doesn't he ask God to fix it then?
4/17/2014 2:20:30 PM
i'm confused, is Rep. Faircloth endorsing the rules or is that statement supposed to be a reason against them? that reads like an endorsement but he is a Republican.
4/17/2014 6:59:24 PM
What a myopic douchebag. It's a good thing that humans are the only organisms of consequence on this planet....
4/17/2014 8:22:26 PM
He seems to think the only way to deal with waste is to dump it in a river, which I really don't think is accurate. Sounds like a lobbyist has gotten to him.
4/18/2014 11:19:23 AM
that's where wastewater and runoff goes[Edited on April 18, 2014 at 11:30 AM. Reason : .]
4/18/2014 11:29:50 AM
Guilford County schools wins an injunction against the General Assembly's 25% planhttp://www.newsobserver.com/2014/04/23/3805892/judge-halts-new-tenure-procedure.html?sp=/99/100/&ihp=1
4/23/2014 8:08:12 PM
It's good to know that every GOP candidate for the senate is so unapologetically anti-science... "No, God no"....
4/23/2014 9:06:11 PM