Now i'm having trouble with Vista media center and network shares. It'll freeze for a few minutes before opening a network folder almost every time. I've read i need to set up the network folders through WMP and not VMC.-So vista has big issues with indexing Thumbnails on network shares. Is there a way to turn off thumbnails or fix this issue? I've been searching but haven't found anything yet. [Edited on August 20, 2008 at 12:50 AM. Reason : ..]
8/20/2008 12:36:50 AM
IE appears to be broken on my Vista. I'm using Vista Ultimate 64, and try using IE64, regular IE, and IE w/o addons, and microsoft.com still displays incorrectly along with several other microsoft-owned websites.I don't normally use IE, but it would be nice if it worked.
8/27/2008 2:38:43 PM
So I installed Vista a month or so ago. Figured I'd give it a shot again now that SP1 has been out a while and most of the kinks have been worked out. It is indeed better. It's almost as good as XP (but not quite) Either way, it's now usable as an OS, which is not something that it was before. But it's still the little things that drive me batshit crazy.Small example: Why in the name of Zeus' butthole will the windows settings not stay the way you set them? I want all my files to display in alphabetical order with the folders at the top, and the files at the bottom in detail view. Shouldn't be too hard, right? So just set the view to details and click the Name tab to sort things alphabetically. No problem, right? Yeah. That lasts until you copy or move one file to the folder. Rather than place the file in the correct order it just assumes that you wanted to put the file out of alphabetic order so there goes the setting. From that point on, there is no special order for the files and folders at all. They stay that way until you manually tell windows how you want the files to be sorted. Which means that for popular folders that I want to KEEP the files sorted alphabetically, I have to sort them 3-4 times a day or more. Which isn't hard...but why can't it just remember that I want them to be alphabetic by name and be done with it. No other version of windows ever acted this way. Yeah, lets change things just because we can. Fuck Microsoft.
10/8/2008 12:52:07 AM
You can change that with folder options.
10/8/2008 3:14:22 AM
^^ just a note about that, when you change the folder options, there's a bit of a difference from XP. in vista, when you apply the view to "all folders", it applies those view settings to those folders of the same "type"... i.e. if it's a picture folder, video folder, etc.in XP, when you apply the view to "all folders", it applies that view setting to all folders.
10/8/2008 11:22:50 AM
Disabled Indexing = huge performance boost(also disabled System Restore for HD space, didn't need b/c of Lenovo Rescue + Recovery)Anyone else got that 1GB Intel Turbo Memory? I'm running 3 GB plus the turbo memory. Performance is fantastic, just wondering if it would be the same without the turbo installed. What effect does it really have?[Edited on October 8, 2008 at 11:28 AM. Reason : ]
10/8/2008 11:28:16 AM
^^^Care to go into a little more detail as to how? Don't think I just went off on an "I hate Vista" rant without at least looking through all the options. ^^You're giving me advice on how to run when I can't even stand up. Sure, getting all my folders to look the way I want them would be great, but I can't figure out how to get just one of them to stay that way.
10/8/2008 3:33:02 PM
Organize->Folder and Search Options->View->Apply to Folderscmon man
10/8/2008 3:58:18 PM
I don't use windows explorer at all.
10/8/2008 4:08:29 PM
10/8/2008 5:52:11 PM
^I just never really liked windows explorer. I've used total commander since windows 3.1. Still supports it too! I like the double panel interface, makes it much easier to move things around.
10/8/2008 6:05:59 PM
yeah i've been using directory opus since xp too
10/8/2008 6:37:19 PM
http://www.google.com/search?q=vista+folder+view+settings
10/8/2008 6:48:33 PM
None of that's working. I've added that key to my registry and set it to 20,000, it still won't remember to alphabetize my files after I drag a new one to the folder. I give up. I've just come to expect that if I'm going to be a Vista user there are going to be piles of shit I'm going to have to wade through. I just consider this to be one more.
10/8/2008 7:29:21 PM
10/8/2008 7:34:59 PM
Deleted, rebooted, changed, rebooted and it's still doing the same thing. I'm not sure that we're even attempting to solve the same problem here. Vista will remember my folder settings for individual folders just fine. Probably until the end of time, as long as I don't copy any files to them. Are you telling me that with your copy of Vista you can switch to Details view, sort the folder alphabetically by name, and then open up another folder and drag a file to the first folder and it automatically sorts the file into its correct location?
10/8/2008 7:42:39 PM
have you tried refreshing the view after copying the files?hit F5 after copying and see if it sorts.
10/8/2008 8:05:15 PM
6 gigs of RAM and a 4200+ x2 and I'm unpleased with this thing's tendency to bog down the processor w/ 64-bit Ultimate
10/8/2008 8:46:10 PM
^^Yeah, that's the way you had to do it in XP, but no go in Vista.
10/8/2008 8:55:01 PM
Has anyone noticed a big difference by turning off the page file with 8 gigs of ram? I'm considering it, but i don't know.[Edited on November 15, 2008 at 7:22 PM. Reason : .]
11/15/2008 7:21:38 PM
I've had my FIRST Vista crash, yesterday. It happened after Left 4 Dead, and I did kinda jerk up the AA to 8X. I never have had this happen before to any other application.
11/16/2008 12:30:35 AM
Did it blue screen and tell you it couldn't reset the video display adapter? Mines done that and i think it's more of a video card issue, and the result of over-heating or cranking up the AA too high.
11/16/2008 12:31:40 AM
Neodata686, it gave me a blue screen and a bunch of numbers. I didn't see anything about a video adapter problem.EDIT: It did say something about a physical memory dump[Edited on November 16, 2008 at 12:43 AM. Reason : edit]
11/16/2008 12:41:43 AM
Ah ok. Usually on the blue screen there's a reason why it blue screened toward the top.
11/16/2008 12:43:07 AM
Yeah a friend of mine actually had the same thing happen in L4D, I think it's a common problem more to blame on the game/video adapter than Vista per se.I've never had a bluescreen playing L4D but I have had the screen freeze and the audio gets caught in a 1/4 second loop forever, but I can still bring up task manager and kill it that way.Also I'd recommend playing with '-novid -windowed -noborder' for instant alt-tab response.Right back to Vista issues now......
11/16/2008 10:44:08 AM
I bought one of those black Friday 1.5TB Seagate drives. I'm waiting on a power adapter to come in so I can hook it up. I've got a couple of questions I can't seem to find a good answer to:1) I will have 3 hard drives in my computer. I have two 250GB SATA drives that are in the RAID configuration that combines the drives into one giant 500GB one (and partitioned into 80GB for the OS and the remainder as a data drive). Will adding in another SATA drive mess up the RAID configuration, or is the computer smart enough to know which two of the three hard drives are combined together?2) After I get the new hard drive installed, I've read that it's good to have a dedicated partition for the Vista swap file to cut down on fragmentation. How big should I make the partition (I only have 2GB of memory), and do I need to format the swap partition as a regular drive (so it will show up as D: or E:, etc?)?/clueless,Joe
12/5/2008 10:20:12 AM
1.) i'm guessing on this, because i don't know for sure and it probably depends on your RAID configuration utility, but...i would think that, since the drive won't even be recognized by the OS until it's initialized, and since RAID is pretty smart, it could operate independently...i could be very wrong on this, though2.) i am a huge proponent of this...1.5x physical memory is a generally good rule of thumb, but as your physical goes up, it doesn't need to be as large, since it likely won't be used as often or to its full potential...with 2gb physical, i'd create a 2gb partition...though these days, i'd always suggest 4gb RAM (if you're running x64) since it's dirt cheap (keep the 2gb page file partition, though)
12/5/2008 11:10:05 AM
speaking of hard drives, shouldn't this raptor be getting more than 5.3 on that vista score BS? Granted it is older than dirt and one of those 36GB models. Perhaps it's time to upgrade
12/5/2008 12:34:10 PM
uh, 5.3 is pretty good. especially for an old as dirt, only 36 GB hard drive
12/5/2008 12:54:08 PM
I would think a 10000rpm raptor would score better than that. It just seems weird because my HDD score is 5.6 and it is only a 150GB 7200rpm SATA drive. When was the last time you wipped that drive clean?
12/5/2008 4:46:04 PM
My raptor gets a 5.9 (highest) on vista. The only thing not 5.9 is the CPU (5.7) because it's only a dual core.
12/5/2008 5:47:18 PM
Original Install Date: 11/5/2008, 8:28:04 PMThis is a fresh install of vista x64. I always wipe the drive every couple of months since it usually only holds my OS.5.3 seemed low to me as well. My E6400 is a 5.7 @ 3.03GHz. Everything else is 5.9 and then of course the HDD.[Edited on December 5, 2008 at 7:54 PM. Reason : .]
12/5/2008 7:54:14 PM
Yeah my c2d 6600 @3.2 is still 5.7.
12/5/2008 7:54:54 PM
12/8/2008 9:13:23 PM
They certainly don't make it easy. Turns out you have to download a DOS utility as an ISO, burn it, boot to it, and set the max capacity of the drive
12/8/2008 10:29:27 PM
For better or worse, 64bit Microsoft OS's are very "Advanced User, at your own peril" pieces of kit.
12/9/2008 4:08:04 PM
vista keeps deciding that i don't have permission to save files where i want. every time i want to save something somewhere other than the default location, i have to go to that directory and give read/write permissions to all users (even if i've already done that)what the hell is going on
2/3/2009 8:45:08 AM
1) what account are you logged in as?2) did you turn off UAC?
2/3/2009 2:27:08 PM
logged in on the only accountuac is still on
2/3/2009 6:35:45 PM