1/3/2006 7:09:16 PM
leave it to lil g to rationalize the falcons missing the playoffs after he sucked michael vick's cock all year long and belittling the panthers for making the playoffslil g i thought you were some kind of self-proclaimed expert gambler...you shouldve bet that the falcons STILL wouldnt have back to back winning seasons EVER
1/4/2006 10:43:36 AM
They didn't have that futures bet, dumbass.Someone's still mad about losing money to me last year.By the way, I used your money to wipe my ass.
1/4/2006 12:43:40 PM
yeah i was gonna use the money i won from you in the chiefs game last year to wipe my load off your girls face but she licked it off like scooby doo
1/4/2006 12:45:18 PM
Ahahaha
1/4/2006 12:46:38 PM
I bet that felt good, winning one out of four bets....You and ncWOLFsu should get together and form a team so people can pick the exact opposite of what you two pick.
1/4/2006 12:53:11 PM
yeah we can use your brilliant falcons picks too so people will know to bet that they WONT make the playoffs
1/4/2006 12:56:44 PM
Even if I HAD picked the Falcons to make the playoffs this year with all their injuries, combine that with last year's Falcons pick and I'm 1-1.Whiiiiiiiiich is better than 1-3.
1/4/2006 1:10:17 PM
i won $500 by picking Notre Dame and the spread vs USC...thats only 1 win...but its $500 so who cares about your piddly bets from last year
1/4/2006 1:34:22 PM
Mmhmmmmmm. Too bad you never posted your bet BEFORE the game. Saying you won a bet after the game doesn't count unless you have proof, dumbass.All you said was that Notre Dame was going to beat USC (they didn't) and that USC isn't as good as last year (they are).I bet you want 2-3 real bad, though. Right now I can only view 25% of what you say as correct.
1/4/2006 1:39:51 PM
the proof i have is the $500 that i had when i won the bet and thats good enough for me...but i dont care if you believe me or not...thats not the point i was making...the point is you must not have much to do if you're still bragging about a few $20 bets we made in Sept-Oct 2004
1/4/2006 1:46:22 PM
Actually, it was two $20 bets (which we split), a $40 bet (which I won) and a $50 bet (which I won).And compare this season's schedule to last season for USC, dumbass. Last year, they played two ranked teams up until the National Championship game. They trailed three teams at halftime (VT, Oregon State and down 11 to Stanford). This year, they've played five ranked teams up until the NC and they're still undefeated.They're at least as good as they were last season.
1/4/2006 2:49:37 PM
if Texas beats them tonight will you still say they are as good as last season? Last season, where they didnt lose a game and had a better defense?
1/4/2006 5:02:39 PM
I'll say they're slightly less better if Texas beats them. It doesn't really matter, though, since this year's Texas team is on par with both this year's AND last year's USC team.
1/4/2006 5:41:11 PM
well i agree about texas being that goodbut come on, if you say they are just as good this year...and last year they went undefeated...and this year they dont go undefeated...then they are not as good3 points in the first half to Arizona State3 fucking points in 30 minutes for the best offense the world has ever seen
1/4/2006 5:43:28 PM
The offenses are basically the same, so if you're talking shit about this year's offense, you're basically talking shit about last year's offense.And USC wouldn't have had such a good shot at remaining undefeated last year if they had to play this Texas team. This year's team would have also kicked Oklahoma's ass last year.And let's not forget that they were down 11 at halftime to Stanford last year.Or that they almost lost to VT and Oregon State.Or that they played only two ranked teams before the NC, compared to five played by this year's squad.
1/4/2006 5:47:58 PM
still think they're better than last year's USC team lil g?
1/5/2006 5:51:03 PM