that 1924 banner is bullshit anywaypathetic that UNC hangs it up with all the others
9/21/2010 12:26:03 PM
To seem rather than to be
9/21/2010 12:27:44 PM
9/21/2010 12:44:18 PM
Where is that quote from? One of the good sources or just speculation? I WANT TO BELIEVE.I don't care if this investigation takes an entire year before the news drops if it means the basketball team gets hit too.Besides, by then this thread will be 500 pages of awesome.
9/21/2010 12:47:33 PM
^ From my boss who goes to the Virginia Tech boards. I have no idea how reliable it is. I get off on rampant speculation though.
9/21/2010 12:49:13 PM
BDS = Boycott Da Schoo!!or Boycott-Divestment-Sanctions?
9/21/2010 1:03:41 PM
haha, this deems may dude, what a phony. He was talking last week about sucking it up, and now he's clearly riding the "the ncaa just has an axe to grind against butch". Also, notice how he keeps admonishing the tarhole faithful to "put of their minds" the guys who aren't cleared, but he starts off every answer with a rehashing of who they thought they'd have and yada yada yada excuses.
9/21/2010 1:06:50 PM
I think PackPride deleted the main UNC thread in the PackPride Sports forum.
9/21/2010 2:36:46 PM
it's still there, it's just that they keep changing the thread title.currently it's titled "UNC Review:Hawkins I’ll speak to (NCAA) when I can if I am avail"
9/21/2010 2:42:53 PM
this is one of the funniest most delusional threads ive seen yet on IC, lots of lulzhttp://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=78&f=1408&t=6408146
9/21/2010 2:43:59 PM
I'M A MANI'M 40
9/21/2010 3:10:26 PM
THAT'S WHY I DON'T READ THE NEWSPAPER, BECAUSE IT'S GARBAGE
9/21/2010 3:13:21 PM
9/21/2010 3:15:02 PM
According to some random shit I found on google, Harvard accepted 7% of applicants, UNC accepted 22% of out-of-state applicants and 35% overall.[Edited on September 21, 2010 at 3:23 PM. Reason : in 2009]
9/21/2010 3:22:51 PM
I don't need Google to know Harvard is more selective than UNC, anybody with half a brain realizes that.
9/21/2010 3:27:24 PM
i dunno manPublic Ivy > Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Brown, Dartmouth, etc
9/21/2010 3:28:25 PM
that is an absolutely absurd statement and it saddens me that someone actually said it and probably meant it.
9/21/2010 3:29:23 PM
9/21/2010 3:30:56 PM
The fact that UNC just lost to GT makes me want to beat GT this weekend even more than I already would. Pumped for Saturday.
9/21/2010 3:36:26 PM
It would be neat if you went on that forum and post that as a reply, here you're just preaching to the choir.
9/21/2010 3:36:46 PM
If you were a proud UNC alum with 30,000 posts on IC and you posted that, they'd permaban your ass
9/21/2010 3:45:26 PM
Not to mention there's like a six month vetting process before you're even approved to post
9/21/2010 4:33:29 PM
Yeah I don't know how I got around that. I think I must have requested access like 2-3 years ago, gotten it, and either forgotten about it, or just figured theres no reason to post there unless they're in a shitstorm like this.
9/21/2010 4:37:56 PM
hey look[Edited on September 21, 2010 at 4:38 PM. Reason : another double post]
^^^I've had access to IC for like ten years. It used to be different though. It hasn't always been PP vs. IC all hard core and shiz, and nobody really cared as much.
9/21/2010 5:00:40 PM
I have access but if I'm gonna get banned I want it to be for an epic post of magnificent magnitude
9/21/2010 5:33:49 PM
I too have an account and am saving my ban for "the big one"The trick is to make a blatantly walmart nation name.
9/21/2010 8:13:19 PM
the football forum over there is painful to read. I don't read PackPride; but is it as bad as IC?
9/21/2010 9:37:16 PM
of course not, it's not full of tarhole faggots.
9/21/2010 9:47:22 PM
yeah really though it is
9/21/2010 10:52:09 PM
Keep in mind IC is the biggest college board on Scout. They have more users than anyone. PP can be pretty one sdied at times, but IC has about 3-5% of it's users that actually went to UNC, the other 95+% are not exactly into the academic portion of the university. That's the difference between PP and IC, I'd like to think we're in the 20-30% range which makes some of the reading tolerable. PP has the usual "we're going al the way this year" blah blah blah, but IC has some of the most delusional stuff about life in general I've never heard/seen/read on any other website. For example, during our 08 beatdown we supplied to them in Kenan, a thread was started to petiton the NCAA to make "stripping the ball" a penalty since UNC was fumbling....Recently, as noted above, countless IC posters have decided that Baddour should pull Giglio's press pass simply because he was asking tough questions to Butch (Keep in mind UNC is a journalism school that the N&O has been catering to for decades). They have also had hundreds of guys irate that the 12 held out aren't playing simply to help recruiting, completely unaware that the NCAA would surely level penalites even greater than USC if UNC were to do this. Not one or two guys, hundreds of them. Like I said, some of the most delusional opinions about football and life and the way things work.
9/22/2010 12:07:06 AM
^Absolutely agree. Some of the posts/threads over on IC are some of the most delusional ones I've ever read. Back when this was just getting underway, maybe a month or so ago, there was a thread that titled something along the lines of "Someone should investigate the NCAA" because the NCAA was dragging their feet (which they still maintain...honestly, do they think the NCAA has been done for some time now and are just waiting for a good time to announce? The USC investigation took years). And they say State fans are delusional. While I can often get a good laugh on IC...it's almost sickening how arrogant and "holier than thou" they act, so I have to remember to only look at IC in moderation. [Edited on September 22, 2010 at 12:15 AM. Reason : ..]
9/22/2010 12:14:33 AM
the best part is that the few sane posters get torn apart by all the insane onesone guy tried to explain to everyone that it wasn't the ncaa dragging their feet, they were waiting on unc to provide their report on the academic investigation before proceedingeveryone immediately jumped all over his case without even attempting a reasonable conversationI love their meltdown
9/22/2010 1:56:53 AM
I would wager that a large number of legit members get labeled as trolls over there bc they have their heads on straight.
9/22/2010 2:50:12 AM
actually the slur du jour over there, against people with thousands of posts is "wolpfie". You get called that if you say anything remotely conciliatory, and obvious state fans are told consistently to leave forums.the funniest one i read yesterday was UNC fans complaining about our schedule. People tried to explain to them that schedules are made 3 years in advance so "State couldn't help that Cincy was so bad."Then a few state posters, who were very nice, no trash-talk tried to say the same thing, and then it was "you state people always start this argument over schedule strength."Its a friggin IC thread started by IC people.
9/22/2010 7:24:02 AM
^^ I've noticed that same thing in my limited reading over there (usually when I know they're in meltdown mode). If someone seems level-headed, rational, or reasonable they are quickly called a "wufpecker" and told to move along. And ^, I read the same thread. I don't necessarily think that the thread about SOS was meant to say that our's was overly weak, but that was the impression it gave. None of those holes could understand that our schedules are actually quite similar, with a UNC have a slightly harder schedule this year. It was hilarious reading one of their posters actually trying to claim that William and Mary was a significantly harder game than Western Carolina. Sure William and Mary is a better FCS team than Western Carolina, but come on...FCS is FCS regardless of how good they are. And when present with facts (our SOS being ranked harder than theirs), they simply ignored it.[Edited on September 22, 2010 at 11:39 AM. Reason : fg]
9/22/2010 11:38:29 AM
9/22/2010 12:21:50 PM
Might as well toss this question out to the wolves My understanding is that the dozen or so players that are under investigation for cheating aren't playing the games but they continue to be a part of the practices. I can understand why they wouldn't play the games. If they play the game and are later deemed ineligible they would have to forfeit any wins.So I guess I was wondering why this didn't extend to practices. Ineligible is ineligible, so it seems like they're getting an unfair advantage by practicing with ineligible players. I.e. their team gets better in practice because the people in practice are more talented and thus harder to score against/defend against. If you follow...I mean what's to stop a team from bringing in a bunch of non-qualifiers (or the Panthers defense) to play their fannies off during one of their practices to help their Dairy Queen team get better./what critics?[Edited on September 22, 2010 at 12:55 PM. Reason : -]
9/22/2010 12:54:04 PM
^^[Edited on September 22, 2010 at 12:58 PM. Reason : p a dot]
9/22/2010 12:57:36 PM
^^That's totally legal. How you practice is up to you, as long as you meet NCAA limitations on total time. How a coach wants to work his team is up to him, but really he's just sitting around with wasted scholarships now while these guys sit out. Sorry for him.[Edited on September 22, 2010 at 12:59 PM. Reason : ^^]
9/22/2010 12:58:45 PM
I was just telling my husband about the SOS thread on IC. I might give UNC the edge on OOC strength simply because they played LSU but on paper our schedule was ranked as 14th hardest while theirs is 24th. We have some tough road games.
9/22/2010 2:51:00 PM
Well I guess they do have a tougher SOS now, since they have to play the Wolfpack and we have to play the Winless Tarholes
9/22/2010 2:54:38 PM
They also like to forget how they opened up the last 2 seasons with Citadel and McNeese State (who almost beat them), while we opened up the last 2 years against an SEC team ourselvesBut what kind of short term memory loss do you expect from a fanbase who expects to blow us out this year, despite the fact that we've beaten them every time Butch and TOB took the field
9/22/2010 3:26:36 PM
UNC and NC State arguing about strength of schedule... what a joke.SOS will truly matter for maybe 2-4 teams a year, this isn't basketball. Neither team is fighting to be in the BCS championship so the only way it would even come up is if we went undefeated(I'm guessing not going to happen). Besides, everyone in the ACC's SOS is garbage simply by just playing in the horrid ACC.
9/22/2010 3:37:51 PM
^ Thanks for your insightful and completely worthless post! State and UNC can argue about SOS as it will impact their chances to make a bowl game. If State played a bunch of schools from the FCS, MAC, and Conference USA, they could potentially be 4-0 and would only need two ACC wins to get a bowl game. Same goes for UNC. [Edited on September 22, 2010 at 3:44 PM. Reason : sd]
9/22/2010 3:42:09 PM
^^ also, it wasn't state and unc-ch fans arguing over SOS. It was unc-ch fans complaining and opining that if they sceduled like "moo-U" then they'd be 3-0 and everyone would be slobbering all over them and they would be top10 by now. People politely tried to inform them otherwise but to no avail.
9/22/2010 3:59:50 PM
FROM IC
9/22/2010 4:05:46 PM
@JimHenryAOL UNC's Kendric Burney and Deunta Williams must miss competition and repay benefits as a condition of becoming eligible to play again.[Edited on September 22, 2010 at 4:06 PM. Reason : lol 6 seconds]
9/22/2010 4:05:52 PM
http://northcarolina.scout.com/2/1004984.html[Edited on September 22, 2010 at 4:09 PM. Reason : ]
9/22/2010 4:09:22 PM
hmm 6 and 4 games for them...I wonder what that is going to mean for others to come and the program as a whole...
9/22/2010 4:09:55 PM