I wonder if the lack of any real cliffhangers was done because of the change in showrunner for next season? Obviously Glen Mazzara wanted to take the show in a direction the rest of the staff and studio didn't agree with. Perhaps his ideas for the finale were curbed so that the new writers didn't have to work themselves out of a corner next season. even still, it sucked.
4/1/2013 7:39:37 PM
Finally saw the final episode, liked it. If anything I think this show suffers from being so popular. It seems like they have to stretch the writing to appeal to a much broader demographic, when instead the storytelling would appeal to a much more niche crowd. They're in this game of trying to please everyone, and in the end leaving most everyone dissatisfied. I am glad Andrea is dead, she was a nuisance. I'm also really happy with the way the governor storyline ended. I didn't expect them to bring out zombieland genocide.Also for those that don't like the cliff hanger-less ending. Season 1 ended with them driving off into the sunset in an RV. Season 2's only cliffhanger was the shot of the prison. They haven't carried any conflict over from season to season, and tend to whitewash a lot of the groups problems through elapsed time.I'm interested to see how kirkman will move the story into a settled prison group with (supposedly) no outside conflict.
4/1/2013 10:29:09 PM
4/1/2013 10:40:43 PM
No great artists try to please everyone. They should just be writing a good show and people either love it or hate it. There's plenty of organically derivable conflict in the situation of zombie survival that they don't need to mix in soap opera esque personality conflicts. There's still time for them to bring the show back to the intrigue of season 1. Ditch the imaginary Lori, deal with vindictive governor, focus on things like raising a child in this environment, is Carl's personality the default? Do kids adapt differently? Should they give up on finding a cure? How do you adapt to meeting new people particularly infirm that need help? Why not try and adapt more technologies?I agree with whoever said they need to take cues from the tell tale games.
4/1/2013 11:03:22 PM
That's why I said "the storyline" and not "the character." The storyline of the governor, woodbury versus the prison, ended with mass murder. At this point it's Philip, Martinez and evil T-Dogg loose in the world. I have my doubts we'll see him in the next season, much like Merle. I think the writers have just created a super-villain that they can pull into the script later down the line whenever they need.Season 1 was an understanding of the new world. Season 2 was internal group conflict. Season 3 was all external group conflict. i think season 4 will be a new problem, not just more me vs. you stuff. My guess is it'll focus more on internal personal conflicts, people losing their mind (they are all going to be locked up in the prison) as well as interpersonal issues like Rick and Carl. I don't think there will be a vacuum of external enemies, but I hope it's more of a 1 episode deal - thugs show up, group fights them off, someone dies, thugs are gone, episode ends.Just read a great nit pick of the finale on io9:
4/1/2013 11:03:52 PM
I agree with the more episodic style. I've been a broken record for that...
4/1/2013 11:30:29 PM
4/2/2013 7:58:37 AM
4/2/2013 8:14:31 AM
^^lololol I'm so glad I didn't have coffee in my mouth. Shit would have been everywhere.Oh and glad Anrdrea is dead. Spent way too much time with her staring at Milton. And how many times did we have to hear her say "I just didn't won't anyone to die". lol, how'd that work out for you. Carl needs to be the new sheriff in town.
4/2/2013 8:59:27 AM
Season 4 should focus on how they continue to have enough gas in their vehicles. and finding toilet paper.
4/2/2013 9:17:17 AM
4/2/2013 9:49:37 AM
I read an interview with Dallas Roberts (Milton) last night and he talked about an alternate scene with Milton and Andrea that they scrapped. The governor doesn't beat the shit out of Milton, but takes him to the room with Andrea and shoots him in the stomach so he can bleed out. He can't get Andrea out of the handcuffs, he then tries to strangle her with chains but is too weak and isn't able to. Basically more of an effort to get her free before he turns. Sounded a lot better than the bullshit they aired. I'm looking for the interview now.There we go: http://insidetv.ew.com/2013/04/01/the-walking-dead-dallas-roberts-milton-andrea/[Edited on April 2, 2013 at 10:07 AM. Reason : .]
4/2/2013 10:06:13 AM
I'm glad carl shot that kid. I expected him to raise his shotty and take out either carl or hershel so he did the right thing. Idiot should have just put DOWN the gun. Can't trust no one in this crazy world.[Edited on April 2, 2013 at 10:12 AM. Reason : .]
4/2/2013 10:11:43 AM
4/2/2013 11:36:47 AM
she looks different
4/2/2013 12:17:38 PM
she been in dat taffy-pulling machine
4/2/2013 12:30:54 PM
4/2/2013 9:37:46 PM
4/2/2013 11:42:34 PM
http://thechive.com/2013/04/03/a-few-things-that-make-no-sense-about-the-walking-dead-33-photos/[Edited on April 3, 2013 at 11:09 AM. Reason : link.]
4/3/2013 11:09:24 AM
lol brilliant.
4/3/2013 11:19:32 AM
i honestly kept expecting them to mess up which eye the governor lost.
4/3/2013 11:21:06 AM
4/3/2013 12:32:40 PM
http://bobbystompy.tumblr.com/post/46851262391/10-things-i-hated-about-the-walking-dead-season-3#_=_pretty spot on for the most part.
4/3/2013 7:46:32 PM
It's almost like the writers are simply trying to prove that you can get nerds to watch anything as long as it's got zombies.
4/3/2013 8:29:51 PM
4/3/2013 8:40:58 PM
Season 2 ended with Rick starting to lose his shit after Shane tries to kill him, the farm is attacked, a bunch a people are killed, and they wait out on the highway for a while not knowing if his wife and the others are alive. Then he flips out after Lori gets pissed at him for killing Shane, and the "Ricktatorship" began.Season 3 was all about rick getting darker and colder and crazier. He loses his mind for a while and stops giving a fuck. But then he finds Morgan and sees how crazy and cold he is, other things show him the "good" in people, and he starts giving a fuck again and gives his "this is a democrazy again" speech and takes in the Woodbury people. He starts to regain some "humanity". While Carl is now becoming a mini crazy rick/governor.Or at least, that's what I think the writers were going for. I agree with a lot of those flaws, but not the part of #9 about going back on his "philosophy".
4/3/2013 9:08:30 PM
i think they were also trying to show Andrea's i-didn't-want-anyone-to-die approach vs. Carl's kill-em-all-and-let-god-sort-em-out approach. Andrea's dead and Carl lives to fight another day.
4/3/2013 9:14:19 PM
I dunno, it's one thing to lower your guard and declare a democracy, but it's another to accept dozens of strangers into your camp when you've made a huge point to not take anyone in. He went from trusting people too much at the end of last season, to seemingly learning his lesson about taking in outsiders while they were on the road between seasons, to trusting people again without a good reason.This all happened just days after he left the hitchhiker on the side of the road to die, and then take his supplies. Pretty drastic flip flop
4/3/2013 9:15:40 PM
i was glad at the end when Rick looked up on the bridge and didn't see Lorihopefully that bitch will never appear in another episode
4/3/2013 9:15:53 PM
4/3/2013 9:23:20 PM
I think that's a good point, showing that Rick went and got his humanity back.
4/3/2013 9:55:00 PM
Lame the writers have created an environment where you almost have to be a complete invalid to be killed by a zombie.
4/3/2013 10:10:45 PM
4/3/2013 10:19:10 PM
This show is terrible. Finale was terrible. Season 3 was terrible.
4/4/2013 7:23:32 AM
Thanks. You've now totally changed my view on all things Walking Dead.
4/4/2013 7:36:21 AM
I don't think this crosses the line of discussing the comics, so hopefully no one cries.Anyone else extremely surprised they killed off a character that's still alive in the comics? I know the show has taken a lot of liberties with the story but this seems like a MAJOR departure from the original source material.Actually makes the show more exciting for me. I can no longer say "X is still alive, so there's no way he/she will die in this situation".
4/4/2013 9:45:30 AM
4/4/2013 9:45:56 AM
4/4/2013 9:48:15 AM
Why watch it then? It's pretty much the only show i regularly watch. I've always been a fan of Romero and the genre. Sure, this show has plenty of flaws, but i still enjoy it.
4/4/2013 9:50:58 AM
Wife likes it. It's not a complete loss; it is the best zombie show on television.
4/4/2013 9:55:58 AM
Regarding why Rick didn't just take Woodbury: I was asking the same thing while watching, but my impression was this:A) In keeping in line with the restoration of his humanity, he never wanted this war and isn't out to take anything from anyone else, regardless of how horrible their leader is.B) Do we know that they took EVERYONE from Woodbury? Maybe he went in, gave a speech, and offered asylum to anyone who wanted to come. If a few people had not wanted to follow him, than he's taking Woodbury from those people too, not just from the GeneralC) Not that there isn't another fight with the General coming no matter what, since he's clearly a lunatic and out for blood, but taking over Woodbury would only make that scenario more likelySo I'm not saying that he shouldn't have taken Woodbury, I'm just saying I can see a reasonable explanation for why he didn't
4/4/2013 9:57:14 AM
yeah, the General is a son of a bitch.
4/4/2013 10:13:02 AM
yeah the whole thing where he gave rick lame auto insurance was stupid
4/4/2013 10:26:36 AM
god damnit...edited reason: I'm a moron
4/4/2013 10:33:36 AM
4/4/2013 10:36:37 AM
I didn't feel like Rick Suddenly got his "humanity" back. The phone calls, Lori visions, then seeing how his son is becoming a stone cold killer, I think snapped him back to reality. That the group shouldn't go down the path that Shayne would have led them down had he been leading the group.
4/4/2013 11:54:56 AM
I thought he just wanted the phone cord
4/4/2013 11:56:34 AM
4/4/2013 11:58:13 AM
So because there is a logical reason for doing something means there is no symbolism that can be associated with it?
4/4/2013 12:09:58 PM
I think you might be giving the writers more credit than they deserve
4/4/2013 12:14:05 PM